Mobile health assisted self-monitoring is acceptable for supporting weight loss in rural men: a pragmatic randomized controlled feasibility trial.
Health disparities
Men
Mobile health technologies
Rural population
Self-monitoring
Weight loss
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 08 2021
18 08 2021
Historique:
received:
19
03
2021
accepted:
07
08
2021
entrez:
19
8
2021
pubmed:
20
8
2021
medline:
15
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Addressing overweight and obesity among men at-risk for obesity-related diseases and disability in rural communities is a public health issue. Commercial smartphone applications (apps) that promote self-monitoring for weight loss are widely available. Evidence is lacking regarding what support is required to enhance user engagement with and effectiveness of those technologies. Pragmatically comparing these apps effectiveness, including rural men's desired forms of support when using them, can lead to greater weight loss intervention impact and reach. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a mobile technology application applied differently across two groups for weight loss. In a two-armed, pragmatic pilot feasibility study, 80 overweight and obese men aged 40-69 were randomized using a 1:1 ratio to either an enhanced Mobile Technology Plus (MT+) intervention or a basic Mobile Technology (MT) intervention. The MT+ group had an enhanced smartphone app for self-monitoring (text messaging, discussion group, Wi-Fi scale) whereas the MT group received a basic app that allowed self-monitoring logging only. Assessments were collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months. App logs were analyzed to track engagement and adherence to self-monitoring. Acceptability was assessed via focus groups. Analysis included descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. Of 80 men recruited, forty were allocated to each arm. All were included in the primary analysis. Recruitment ended after 10 months with a 97.5 and 92.5% (3 month, 6 month) retention rate. Over 90% of men reported via survey and focus groups that Lose-It app and smart scale (MT+) was an acceptable way to self-monitor weight, dietary intake and physical activity. Adherence to daily app self-monitoring of at least 800 dietary calories or more (reported respectively as MT+, MT) was positive with 73.4, 51.6% tracking at least 5 days a week. Adherence to tracking activity via recorded steps four or more days weekly was positive, 87.8, 64.6%. Men also adhered to self-weighing at least once weekly, 64, 46.3%. At 6 months, an observed mean weight loss was 7.03 kg (95% CI: 3.67, 10.39) for MT+ group and 4.14 kg (95% CI: 2.22, 6.06) for MT group, with 42.9 and 34.2% meeting ≥5% weight loss, respectively. No adverse events were reported. This National Institutes of Health-funded pilot study using mobile technologies to support behavior change for weight loss was found to be feasible and acceptable among midlife and older rural men. The interventions demonstrated successful reductions in weight, noting differing adherence to lifestyle behaviors of eating, monitoring and activity between groups, with men in the MT+ having more favorable results. These findings will be used to inform the design of a larger scale, clinical trial. The trial was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials NCT03329079 . 11/1/2017.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Addressing overweight and obesity among men at-risk for obesity-related diseases and disability in rural communities is a public health issue. Commercial smartphone applications (apps) that promote self-monitoring for weight loss are widely available. Evidence is lacking regarding what support is required to enhance user engagement with and effectiveness of those technologies. Pragmatically comparing these apps effectiveness, including rural men's desired forms of support when using them, can lead to greater weight loss intervention impact and reach. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a mobile technology application applied differently across two groups for weight loss.
METHODS
In a two-armed, pragmatic pilot feasibility study, 80 overweight and obese men aged 40-69 were randomized using a 1:1 ratio to either an enhanced Mobile Technology Plus (MT+) intervention or a basic Mobile Technology (MT) intervention. The MT+ group had an enhanced smartphone app for self-monitoring (text messaging, discussion group, Wi-Fi scale) whereas the MT group received a basic app that allowed self-monitoring logging only. Assessments were collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months. App logs were analyzed to track engagement and adherence to self-monitoring. Acceptability was assessed via focus groups. Analysis included descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS
Of 80 men recruited, forty were allocated to each arm. All were included in the primary analysis. Recruitment ended after 10 months with a 97.5 and 92.5% (3 month, 6 month) retention rate. Over 90% of men reported via survey and focus groups that Lose-It app and smart scale (MT+) was an acceptable way to self-monitor weight, dietary intake and physical activity. Adherence to daily app self-monitoring of at least 800 dietary calories or more (reported respectively as MT+, MT) was positive with 73.4, 51.6% tracking at least 5 days a week. Adherence to tracking activity via recorded steps four or more days weekly was positive, 87.8, 64.6%. Men also adhered to self-weighing at least once weekly, 64, 46.3%. At 6 months, an observed mean weight loss was 7.03 kg (95% CI: 3.67, 10.39) for MT+ group and 4.14 kg (95% CI: 2.22, 6.06) for MT group, with 42.9 and 34.2% meeting ≥5% weight loss, respectively. No adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS
This National Institutes of Health-funded pilot study using mobile technologies to support behavior change for weight loss was found to be feasible and acceptable among midlife and older rural men. The interventions demonstrated successful reductions in weight, noting differing adherence to lifestyle behaviors of eating, monitoring and activity between groups, with men in the MT+ having more favorable results. These findings will be used to inform the design of a larger scale, clinical trial.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The trial was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials NCT03329079 . 11/1/2017.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34407782
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11618-7
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-11618-7
pmc: PMC8375071
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03329079']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1568Subventions
Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : R15 NR017522
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Nature. 2019 May;569(7755):260-264
pubmed: 31068725
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):277-285
pubmed: 28616846
West J Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;40(4):462-480
pubmed: 28322640
Qual Health Res. 2010 May;20(5):718-22
pubmed: 20406996
J Obes. 2017;2017:1602627
pubmed: 28480078
Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S102-38
pubmed: 24222017
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):576-82
pubmed: 24139770
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 16;14(8):
pubmed: 28813030
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Jul;11(4):1096-1123
pubmed: 26130729
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12
pubmed: 15189396
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006 Jul-Aug;38(4):249-53
pubmed: 16785095
Health Psychol. 2019 Dec;38(12):1128-1136
pubmed: 31556659
Healthc Inform Res. 2018 Jul;24(3):207-226
pubmed: 30109154
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jun 18;6(6):e128
pubmed: 29914860
Nutrients. 2020 Nov 26;12(12):
pubmed: 33255982
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 14;10(4):e035089
pubmed: 32295776
Addict Behav. 1994 Mar-Apr;19(2):147-58
pubmed: 8036962
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Jun;112(6):840-9
pubmed: 22709811
Obes Sci Pract. 2019 Dec 12;6(2):126-133
pubmed: 32313670
Obes Rev. 2009 Mar;10(2):154-67
pubmed: 19021872
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 13;8(1):e12651
pubmed: 31929104
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 03;7(4):e11244
pubmed: 30942695
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S14-32
pubmed: 21800940
J Rural Health. 2015 Winter;31(1):19-26
pubmed: 25040534
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Sep;21(9):1789-97
pubmed: 23512320
JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-14
pubmed: 24570244
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8
pubmed: 18091006
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 08;21(1):e298
pubmed: 30622090
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Apr;31(2):180-91
pubmed: 18183564
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027744
pubmed: 33337491
Urol Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;39(1):63-75
pubmed: 22118346
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Mar;26(3):365-368
pubmed: 30994410
Body Image. 2009 Mar;6(2):90-6
pubmed: 19188102
Health Psychol. 2018 Jun;37(6):501-515
pubmed: 29733617
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 May;38(1):130-3
pubmed: 24735841
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S81-S89
pubmed: 30559234
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 17;7(5):e9232
pubmed: 31102369
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Aug;110(8):1227-32
pubmed: 20656099
Prev Med. 2015 Jan;70:59-63
pubmed: 25448840
Diabet Med. 1998 Feb;15(2):125-8
pubmed: 9507912
N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):1959-68
pubmed: 22085317
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Apr;45(2):139-52
pubmed: 23129021
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;12(4):215-7
pubmed: 23851406
Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):690-701
pubmed: 19916637
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 17;22(3):e15790
pubmed: 32181749
Public Health Nurs. 2017 Mar;34(2):138-146
pubmed: 27757986
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Nov;32(11):1913-8
pubmed: 11079522
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 05;6(1):e4
pubmed: 29305343
NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Oct;(288):1-8
pubmed: 29155689
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):863-876
pubmed: 27170674
Hypertension. 2005 Jan;45(1):142-61
pubmed: 15611362
J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Sep;20(6):339-49
pubmed: 24875928