Comparison of Tru-Cut Biopsy and Incisional Biopsy in Achieving Prompt Diagnosis of Maxillofacial Pathology.
Biopsy
Core needle
Maxillofacial pathology
Tru-cut needle
Journal
Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery
ISSN: 0972-8279
Titre abrégé: J Maxillofac Oral Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101538309
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
07
01
2020
accepted:
27
03
2021
entrez:
19
8
2021
pubmed:
20
8
2021
medline:
20
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tru-cut (core needle) biopsy has many advantages over open biopsy. It is quick and easy to perform, may be carried out in the outpatient department, avoids incision through previously irradiated skin and has few complications. The purpose of this study is to compare the two available biopsy techniques that are Tru-cut biopsy and incisional biopsy in achieving prompt diagnosis of maxillofacial pathology. A prospective study was conducted in 25 patients reported to our department. The Tru-cut biopsy was performed by using 14 gauge disposable Tru-cut biopsy needles (Baxter, made in the USA) by means of two successive insertions with different angulations of the needle into the core of the lesion followed by incisional biopsy. The diagnostic criteria which were evaluated include: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy. Tru-cut biopsy had sensitivity of 68.42%; specificity of 83.33%; PPV of 92.86%; NPV of 45.45% with accuracy rate of 72%. The Tru-cut biopsy method was evaluated as a very helpful method for prompt diagnosis of maxillofacial pathology since it is practical to perform, causes minimum trauma to the tissue, decreases the metastatic risk of malignant lesions during the procedure and relatively free from complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34408377
doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01557-6
pii: 1557
pmc: PMC8313593
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
479-485Informations de copyright
© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestOn behalf of all co-authors, the corresponding author declares that they have no conflict of interest. The copy of the signed form is attached separately.
Références
Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Jan;5(1):28-30
pubmed: 12592954
Acta Cytol. 1998 May-Jun;42(3):697-702
pubmed: 9622690
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002 May;93(5):528-33
pubmed: 12075200
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;48(1):46-7
pubmed: 19121879
J Assoc Physicians India. 2008 Jun;56:425-8
pubmed: 18822621
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Oct;40(5):384-8
pubmed: 12379183
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Oct;25(9):1608-12
pubmed: 15502149
Postgrad Med J. 1991 Feb;67(784):170-3
pubmed: 2041848
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jan;47(1):78-9
pubmed: 18539371
Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):471-8
pubmed: 21364082
Br J Surg. 1986 Sep;73(9):742-4
pubmed: 3756440
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Jul;74(4):277-80
pubmed: 1416683
Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Oct;136(4):516-26
pubmed: 21917673
Acta Cytol. 2006 Mar-Apr;50(2):141-6
pubmed: 16610680
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;36(6):767-72
pubmed: 20737454
Radiology. 1995 Dec;197(3):739-42
pubmed: 7480748
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004 Jul;128(7):759-64
pubmed: 15214827
Indian J Orthop. 2013 Mar;47(2):195-9
pubmed: 23682183
Cancer. 2007 Jun 1;109(11):2268-72
pubmed: 17427170
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Sep;171(3):759-62
pubmed: 9725312