Real-world implementation of sequential targeted therapies for EGFR-mutated lung cancer.
EGFR T790M mutation
EGFR+ NSCLC
overall survival
rebiopsy
second line
tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Journal
Therapeutic advances in medical oncology
ISSN: 1758-8340
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Med Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101510808
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
19
10
2020
accepted:
27
01
2021
entrez:
19
8
2021
pubmed:
20
8
2021
medline:
20
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFR EGFR A total of 207 patients received erlotinib (37%), gefitinib (16%) or afatinib (47%). The median age was 66 years, with a predominance of female (70%), never/light-smokers (69%). T790M testing was performed in 174/202 progressive cases (86%), positive in 93/174 (53%), and followed by osimertinib in 87/93 (94%). Among the 135 deceased patients, 94 (70%) received subsequent systemic treatment (43% chemotherapy, 39% osimertinib), while 30% died without, either before (4%) or after progression, due to rapid clinical deterioration (22%), patient refusal of further therapy (2%), or severe competing illness (2%). Lack of subsequent treatment was significantly (4.5x, Osimertinib after 1G/2G TKI failure prolongs survival, but approximately 15% and 30% of patients forego molecular retesting and subsequent treatment, respectively, mainly due to rapid clinical deterioration. This is an important remediable obstacle to sequential TKI treatment for EGFR
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFR
METHODS
METHODS
EGFR
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 207 patients received erlotinib (37%), gefitinib (16%) or afatinib (47%). The median age was 66 years, with a predominance of female (70%), never/light-smokers (69%). T790M testing was performed in 174/202 progressive cases (86%), positive in 93/174 (53%), and followed by osimertinib in 87/93 (94%). Among the 135 deceased patients, 94 (70%) received subsequent systemic treatment (43% chemotherapy, 39% osimertinib), while 30% died without, either before (4%) or after progression, due to rapid clinical deterioration (22%), patient refusal of further therapy (2%), or severe competing illness (2%). Lack of subsequent treatment was significantly (4.5x,
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Osimertinib after 1G/2G TKI failure prolongs survival, but approximately 15% and 30% of patients forego molecular retesting and subsequent treatment, respectively, mainly due to rapid clinical deterioration. This is an important remediable obstacle to sequential TKI treatment for EGFR
Identifiants
pubmed: 34408792
doi: 10.1177/1758835921996509
pii: 10.1177_1758835921996509
pmc: PMC8366107
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1758835921996509Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement: FB reports personal fees from Novartis, MSD, Chugai Pharma, Roche, and AstraZeneca and research grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, and Roche. ALV reports personal fees from AstraZeneca. DK reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH, personal fees from Pfizer Pharma GmbH, outside the submitted work. FJH reports advisory board fees and honoraria from Lilly, Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer, Chiesi, Teva, Pulmonx BTG, and Olympus as well as research funding from Lilly, Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer, Chiesi, and Teva. CPH reports consultation, lecture and other fees from Novartis, Basilea, Bayer, Grifols, Boehringer, Pierre Fabre, Covidien, Siemens, Chiesi, Intermune, MEDA Pharma, Bracco, Pfizer, MSD, Roche, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Schering-Plough, Essex, Gilead, MeVis, Fresenius, and Astellas as well as ownership of GSK stocks TM reports research funding from Roche and patents with Roche. JRF reports advisory board honoraria from Boehringer, Roche, Celgene, and AstraZeneca. PS reports advisory board honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, and AstraZeneca as well as speaker’s honoraria and research funding from Roche, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. AS reports advisory board honoraria and/or speaker fees: Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Roche, BMS, Illumina, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, and Thermo Fisher, and research grants from BMS, Bayer, and Chugai. MT reports advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Lilly, BMS, MSD, Roche, Celgene, Takeda, AbbVie, Boehringer, speaker’s honoraria from Lilly, MSD, Takeda, research funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Novartis, Roche and travel grants from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Boehringer. PC reports lecture/advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Takeda, as well as research funding from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda.
Références
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jul;12(7):1061-1070
pubmed: 28428148
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2019 Mar 8;4:5
pubmed: 30854234
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2019 Dec 17;4:61
pubmed: 31871778
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015 Feb;4(1):67-81
pubmed: 25806347
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018 Jan 22;10:1758834017753338
pubmed: 29383041
Oncol Ther. 2018 Dec;6(2):203-215
pubmed: 32700028
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018 Feb 05;10:1758834018755072
pubmed: 29434678
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):629-640
pubmed: 27959700
Ann Oncol. 2020 Nov;31(11):1536-1544
pubmed: 32861806
Eur Respir J. 2014 Oct;44(4):1011-22
pubmed: 25102961
Future Oncol. 2018 Nov;14(27):2861-2874
pubmed: 30336693
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Sep;10(9):1243-1260
pubmed: 26291008
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;36(22):2244-2250
pubmed: 29864379
Transl Oncol. 2019 Jun;12(6):852-858
pubmed: 31030101
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 20;36(9):911-919
pubmed: 29401004
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Jun 1;111(6):575-583
pubmed: 30496436
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Jun 06;11:3335-3343
pubmed: 29922072
Int J Cancer. 2019 Aug 1;145(3):649-661
pubmed: 30653256
J Thorac Dis. 2011 Mar;3(1):10-8
pubmed: 22263058
Lung Cancer. 2020 Sep;147:123-129
pubmed: 32693293
Adv Ther. 2020 Feb;37(2):946-954
pubmed: 31955357
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 Apr 15;11:1758835919836374
pubmed: 31019567
Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;121(15):2562-9
pubmed: 25891153
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Aug;17(4):343-6
pubmed: 8889347
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Oct;9(Suppl 13):S1323-S1331
pubmed: 29184671
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 6;8(1):13379
pubmed: 30190486
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 28;:JCO2018783118
pubmed: 30153097
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jan;125:49-57
pubmed: 31838405
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2010 Sep;2(5):301-7
pubmed: 21789142
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):113-125
pubmed: 29151359
Target Oncol. 2019 Feb;14(1):75-83
pubmed: 30539501
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 10;27(20):3268-70
pubmed: 19470913
Ann Oncol. 2020 Nov;31(11):1491-1505
pubmed: 32853681
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 2;382(1):41-50
pubmed: 31751012
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;15(11):694-708
pubmed: 30108370
Lung Cancer. 2011 Jul;73(1):70-7
pubmed: 21095039
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 Nov 25;11:1758835919890286
pubmed: 31803256
JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-198
pubmed: 28586821
Lung Cancer. 2010 May;68(2):273-7
pubmed: 19632737
Virchows Arch. 2017 Oct;471(4):509-520
pubmed: 28884371
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 5;8(59):100801-100818
pubmed: 29246024
Br J Cancer. 2019 Oct;121(9):725-737
pubmed: 31564718
Lung Cancer. 2020 Oct;148:105-112
pubmed: 32871455
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018 Mar;123:149-161
pubmed: 29482776