Relationship between chromatin configuration and in vitro maturation ability in guinea pig oocytes.
chromatin configuration
competence of maturation
germinal vesicle
guinea pig oocyte
Journal
Veterinary medicine and science
ISSN: 2053-1095
Titre abrégé: Vet Med Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101678837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
20
8
2021
medline:
1
3
2022
entrez:
19
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Germinal vesicle (GV) chromatin configurations of oocytes are proposed to be related to oocyte competence and may reflect the quality of oocyte. Currently, a limited number of published studies investigated the GV chromatin configurations of guinea pig oocytes. In this study on the in vitro maturation (IVM) of guinea pig oocytes, we examined the changes in their GV chromatin configurations during meiotic progression. Based on the degree of chromatin compaction, the GV chromatin configurations of guinea pig oocytes could be divided into three categories depending on whether the nucleolus-like body (NLB) was surrounded or partly surrounded by compacted chromatin, namely the uncondensed (NSN), the intermediate type (SN-1) and the compacted type (SN-2). The percentage of cells displaying the SN-2 configuration increased with the growth of guinea pig oocytes, suggesting that this configuration presents the potential for maturation in oocytes. Oocytes derived from larger follicle exhibited increased meiotic potential. Serum starvation affected the GV chromatin configurations of guinea pig oocytes. Collectively, these results suggest that the SN-2 type might be a more mature form of configuration in guinea pig oocyte, whose proportion was associated with the follicle size and susceptible to the environment (e.g. serum concentration).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Germinal vesicle (GV) chromatin configurations of oocytes are proposed to be related to oocyte competence and may reflect the quality of oocyte. Currently, a limited number of published studies investigated the GV chromatin configurations of guinea pig oocytes.
OBJECTIVE
In this study on the in vitro maturation (IVM) of guinea pig oocytes, we examined the changes in their GV chromatin configurations during meiotic progression.
METHODS
Based on the degree of chromatin compaction, the GV chromatin configurations of guinea pig oocytes could be divided into three categories depending on whether the nucleolus-like body (NLB) was surrounded or partly surrounded by compacted chromatin, namely the uncondensed (NSN), the intermediate type (SN-1) and the compacted type (SN-2).
RESULTS
The percentage of cells displaying the SN-2 configuration increased with the growth of guinea pig oocytes, suggesting that this configuration presents the potential for maturation in oocytes. Oocytes derived from larger follicle exhibited increased meiotic potential. Serum starvation affected the GV chromatin configurations of guinea pig oocytes.
CONCLUSIONS
Collectively, these results suggest that the SN-2 type might be a more mature form of configuration in guinea pig oocyte, whose proportion was associated with the follicle size and susceptible to the environment (e.g. serum concentration).
Identifiants
pubmed: 34409767
doi: 10.1002/vms3.596
pmc: PMC8604138
doi:
Substances chimiques
Chromatin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2410-2417Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Biol Reprod. 2015 Jan;92(1):13
pubmed: 25411393
Mol Reprod Dev. 2005 Jun;71(2):227-36
pubmed: 15791590
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1818:23-30
pubmed: 29961251
Mol Hum Reprod. 2009 Jan;15(1):1-9
pubmed: 19019837
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 17;15(3):e0229043
pubmed: 32182244
Reproduction. 2015 Sep;150(3):183-92
pubmed: 26116002
Mol Reprod Dev. 1995 Aug;41(4):479-85
pubmed: 7576615
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:879489
pubmed: 23509795
Biol Reprod. 1993 Feb;48(2):363-70
pubmed: 8439626
Biol Reprod. 1998 Mar;58(3):700-4
pubmed: 9510956
Mol Reprod Dev. 2003 Apr;64(4):458-70
pubmed: 12589658
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019 Jul;32(7):956-965
pubmed: 30744366
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013 Sep;30(9):1219-26
pubmed: 23881161
Hum Reprod Update. 1998 Mar-Apr;4(2):103-20
pubmed: 9683349
Theriogenology. 2002 Apr 15;57(7):1819-28
pubmed: 12041686
Zygote. 2011 Aug;19(3):191-7
pubmed: 21303586
Mol Reprod Dev. 2004 Oct;69(2):228-34
pubmed: 15293225
Fertil Steril. 2009 Apr;91(4 Suppl):1589-94
pubmed: 19100534
Biochem Pharmacol. 2017 Aug 1;137:81-92
pubmed: 28438565
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019 Dec 2;17(1):105
pubmed: 31791345
Hum Reprod. 2008 Jun;23(6):1377-84
pubmed: 18367455
Theriogenology. 2007 Nov;68(8):1138-49
pubmed: 17868798
Theriogenology. 2002 Mar 15;57(5):1523-32
pubmed: 12054210
Vet Med Sci. 2021 Nov;7(6):2410-2417
pubmed: 34409767
Reprod Domest Anim. 2012 Dec;47 Suppl 6:70-3
pubmed: 23279469
Microsc Res Tech. 2006 Oct;69(10):799-807
pubmed: 16886230
Life Sci. 2020 Jan 15;241:117100
pubmed: 31783052
Reprod Domest Anim. 2009 Apr;44(2):320-5
pubmed: 18992097
Mol Reprod Dev. 2001 Oct;60(2):260-9
pubmed: 11553927
Theriogenology. 2020 Jan 1;141:146-152
pubmed: 31541784
Equine Vet J Suppl. 1997 Dec;(25):43-6
pubmed: 9593526
Biol Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;99(6):1149-1158
pubmed: 29912286
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 24;6:23555
pubmed: 27009903
Anim Reprod Sci. 2008 Jan 30;103(3-4):336-47
pubmed: 17212978
Reproduction. 2016 Nov;152(5):R143-57
pubmed: 27422885
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2013;25(8):1204-15
pubmed: 23336581
Theriogenology. 2019 Oct 15;138:154-163
pubmed: 31357118