Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Revisional Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Perioperative Outcomes.
Bariatric surgery
Laparoscopic surgery
Morbid obesity
Revisional surgery
Robotic surgery
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
06
06
2021
accepted:
11
08
2021
revised:
11
08
2021
pubmed:
20
8
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
entrez:
19
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the role of robotic-assisted surgery in patients undergoing revisional bariatric surgery (RBS). According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed: (("sleeve"AND "gastr*")OR "bariatric"OR "gastric bypass")AND("robot*"OR "DaVinci"OR "Da Vinci")AND("revision*"OR "conversion*"). In this review, six studies with 29,890 patients were included (2459 in the robotic group). No difference in postoperative complications (RR 1.070, 95%CI 0.930-1.231, p = 0.950), conversions to open surgery (RR 1.339, 95%CI 0.736-2.438, p = 0.339), length of stay (SMD - 0.041, 95%CI - 0.420-0.337, p = 0.831) or operative time (RR 0.219, 95%CI - 0.539-0.977, p = 0.571) was found. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed no significant advantage of robotic-assisted RBS; on the other hand, it showed a non-inferior efficacy compared to standard laparoscopy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34410582
doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05668-4
pii: 10.1007/s11695-021-05668-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5022-5033Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Nanni G, et al. Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus conventional medical treatment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 5 year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9997):964–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00075-6 .
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00075-6
pubmed: 26369473
English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Hutter MM, Kothari SN, Mattar SG, Brethauer SA, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(4):457–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.022 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.022
pubmed: 32029370
Altieri MS, Yang J, Nie L, Blackstone R, Spaniolas K, Pryor A. Rate of revisions or conversion after bariatric surgery over 10 years in the state of New York. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(4):500–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.019 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.019
pubmed: 29496440
Zhang L, Tan WH, Chang R, Eagon JC. Perioperative risk and complications of revisional bariatric surgery compared to primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1316–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3848-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3848-4
pubmed: 25294534
Inabnet WB 3rd, Belle SH, Bessler M, Courcoulas A, Dellinger P, Garcia L, et al. Comparison of 30-day outcomes after non-LapBand primary and revisional bariatric surgical procedures from the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.10.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.10.007
pubmed: 20129303
Shimizu H, Annaberdyev S, Motamarry I, Kroh M, Schauer PR, Brethauer SA. Revisional bariatric surgery for unsuccessful weight loss and complications. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1766–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1012-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1012-1
pubmed: 23828032
Cheung D, Switzer NJ, Gill RS, Shi X, Karmali S. Revisional bariatric surgery following failed primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1757–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1332-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1332-9
pubmed: 24927693
Zhang Z, Miao L, Ren Z, Li Y. Robotic bariatric surgery for the obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(6):2440–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08283-z .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08283-z
pubmed: 33881624
Alibhai MH, Shah SK, Walker PA, Wilson EB. A review of the role of robotics in bariatric surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(3):279–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23913 .
doi: 10.1002/jso.23913
pubmed: 25953149
Pini R, Mongelli F, Proietti F, Cianfarani A, Garofalo F, Di Giuseppe M, et al. Suture and fixation of the transversalis fascia during robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair to prevent seroma formation after direct inguinal hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2021;28(3):284–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350620960976 .
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Reprint–preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther. 2009;89(9):873–80.
doi: 10.1093/ptj/89.9.873
pubmed: 19723669
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343: d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928
pubmed: 22008217
pmcid: 3196245
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):401–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
pubmed: 21208779
Walter SD, Yao X. Effect sizes can be calculated for studies reporting ranges for outcome variables in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(8):849–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.003
pubmed: 17606182
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135 .
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
pubmed: 25524443
pmcid: 4383202
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45(Pt A):139–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002
pubmed: 26343745
pmcid: 4639420
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186 .
doi: 10.1002/sim.1186
pubmed: 12111919
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
pubmed: 12958120
pmcid: 192859
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
pubmed: 9310563
pmcid: 2127453
Buchs NC, Pugin F, Azagury DE, Huber O, Chassot G, Morel P. Robotic revisional bariatric surgery: a comparative study with laparoscopic and open surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2014;10(2):213–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1549 .
doi: 10.1002/rcs.1549
pubmed: 24167029
Gray KD, Moore MD, Elmously A, Bellorin O, Zarnegar R, Dakin G, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic revisional bariatric surgery in a complex patient population. Obes Surg. 2018;28(7):1852–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3119-x .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3119-x
pubmed: 29417487
Nasser H, Munie S, Kindel TL, Gould JC, Higgins RM. Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(3):397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.11.018 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.11.018
pubmed: 31932204
King K, Galvez A, Stoltzfus J, Claros L, El Chaar M. Robotic-assisted surgery results in a shorter hospital stay following revisional bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2021;31(2):634–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05022-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05022-0
pubmed: 33078338
Moon RC, Segura AR, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA. Feasibility and safety of robot-assisted bariatric conversions and revisions. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(8):1080–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.03.030 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.03.030
pubmed: 32423831
Beckmann JH, Mehdorn AS, Kersebaum JN, von Schönfels W, Taivankhuu T, Laudes M, et al. Pros and cons of robotic revisional bariatric surgery. Visc Med. 2020;36(3):238–45. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507742 .
doi: 10.1159/000507742
pubmed: 32775356
pmcid: 7383264
Fulton C, Sheppard C, Birch D, Karmali S, de Gara C. A comparison of revisional and primary bariatric surgery. Can J Surg. 2017;60(3):205–11. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.006116 .
doi: 10.1503/cjs.006116
pubmed: 28570215
pmcid: 5453764
Moszkowicz D, Rau C, Guenzi M, Zinzindohoué F, Berger A, Chevallier JM. Laparoscopic omega-loop gastric bypass for the conversion of failed sleeve gastrectomy: early experience. J Visc Surg. 2013;150(6):373–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.08.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.08.010
pubmed: 24139677
Musella M, Bruni V, Greco F, Raffaelli M, Lucchese M, Susa A, et al. Conversion from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): preliminary data from a multicenter retrospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(8):1332–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.026 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.026
pubmed: 31272866
Piazza L, Di Stefano C, Ferrara F, Bellia A, Vacante M, Biondi A. Revision of failed primary adjustable gastric banding to mini-gastric bypass: results in 48 consecutive patients. Updates Surg. 2015;67(4):433–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0335-y .
doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0335-y
pubmed: 26590850
Lauti M, Kularatna M, Hill AG, MacCormick AD. Weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy-a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(6):1326–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2152-x .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2152-x
pubmed: 27048439
Brethauer SA, Kothari S, Sudan R, Williams B, English WJ, Brengman M, et al. Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery: American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(5):952–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.014
pubmed: 24776071
Mor A, Keenan E, Portenier D, Torquati A. Case-matched analysis comparing outcomes of revisional versus primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(2):548–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2477-z .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2477-z
pubmed: 22806534
Di Giuseppe M, Mongelli F, Marcantonio M, La Regina D, Pini R. Robotic assisted treatment of flank hernias: case series. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00843-3 .
doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00843-3
pubmed: 32787817
pmcid: 7430830
Pini R, Di Giuseppe M, Toti JMA, Mongelli F, Marcantonio M, Spampatti S, et al. Robot-assisted treatment of epigastric hernias with a suprapubic approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000000941 .
doi: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000941
pubmed: 33900226
Rebecchi F, Ugliono E, Allaix ME, Toppino M, Borello A, Morino M. Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revisional bariatric procedure: a single-center prospective cohort study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(1):11–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04117-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04117-7
pubmed: 31372875
Acevedo E, Mazzei M, Zhao H, Lu X, Edwards MA. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(4):1573–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06917-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06917-5
pubmed: 31209611
El Chaar M, King K, Pastrana M, Galvez A, Stoltzfus J. Outcomes of robotic surgery in revisional bariatric cases: a propensity score-matched analysis of the MBSAQIP registry. J Robot Surg. 2021;15(2):235–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01098-z .
doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01098-z
pubmed: 32474795
Dreifuss NH, Mangano A, Hassan C, Masrur MA. Robotic revisional bariatric surgery: a high-volume center experience. Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1656–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05174-z .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05174-z
pubmed: 33392998