Quantification reveals early dynamics in Drosophila maternal gradients.
Animals
Body Patterning
/ genetics
Cell Nucleus
/ genetics
Cytoplasm
/ genetics
Drosophila
/ genetics
Drosophila Proteins
/ genetics
Embryo, Nonmammalian
/ physiology
Embryonic Development
/ genetics
Homeodomain Proteins
/ genetics
Morphogenesis
/ genetics
RNA, Messenger
/ genetics
RNA-Binding Proteins
/ genetics
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
12
12
2020
accepted:
16
07
2021
entrez:
19
8
2021
pubmed:
20
8
2021
medline:
24
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Bicoid (Bcd) protein is a primary determinant of early anterior-posterior (AP) axis specification in Drosophila embryogenesis. This morphogen is spatially distributed in an anterior-high gradient, and affects particular AP cell fates in a concentration-dependent manner. The early distribution and dynamics of the bicoid (bcd) mRNA, the source for the Bcd protein gradient, is not well understood, leaving a number of open questions for how Bcd positional information develops and is regulated. Confocal microscope images of whole early embryos, stained for bcd mRNA or the Staufen (Stau) protein involved in its transport, were processed to extract quantitative AP intensity profiles at two depths (apical-under the embryo surface but above the nuclear layer; and basal-below the nuclei). Each profile was quantified by a two- (or three-) exponential equation. The parameters of these equations were used to analyze the early developmental dynamics of bcd. Analysis of 1D profiles was compared with 2D intensity surfaces from the same images. This approach reveals strong early changes in bcd and Stau, which appear to be coordinated. We can unambiguously discriminate three stages in early development using the exponential parameters: pre-blastoderm (1-9 cleavage cycle, cc), syncytial blastoderm (10-13 cc) and cellularization (from 14A cc). Key features which differ in this period are how fast the first exponential (anterior component) of the apical profile drops with distance and whether it is higher or lower than the basal first exponential. We can further discriminate early and late embryos within the pre-blastoderm stage, depending on how quickly the anterior exponential drops. This relates to the posterior-wards spread of bcd in the first hour of development. Both bcd and Stau show several redistributions in the head cytoplasm, quite probably related to nuclear activity: first shifting inwards towards the core plasm, forming either protrusions (early pre-blastoderm) or round aggregations (early nuclear cleavage cycles, cc, 13 and 14), then moving to the embryo surface and spreading posteriorly. These movements are seen both with the 2D surface study and the 1D profile analysis. The continued spreading of bcd can be tracked from the time of nuclear layer formation (later pre-blastoderm) to the later syncytial blastoderm stages by the progressive loss of steepness of the apical anterior exponential (for both bcd and Stau). Finally, at the beginning of cc14 (cellularization stage) we see a distinctive flip from the basal anterior gradient being higher to the apical gradient being higher (for both bcd and Stau). Quantitative analysis reveals substantial (and correlated) bcd and Stau redistributions during early development, supporting that the distribution and dynamics of bcd mRNA are key factors in the formation and maintenance of the Bcd protein morphogenetic gradient. This analysis reveals the complex and dynamic nature of bcd redistribution, particularly in the head cytoplasm. These resemble observations in oogenesis; their role and significance have yet to be clarified. The observed co-localization during redistribution of bcd and Stau may indicate the involvement of active transport.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34411119
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244701
pii: PONE-D-20-39109
pmc: PMC8376041
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drosophila Proteins
0
Homeodomain Proteins
0
RNA, Messenger
0
RNA-Binding Proteins
0
stau protein, Drosophila
139568-71-1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0244701Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Development. 2015 Dec 1;142(23):3996-4009
pubmed: 26628090
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112053
pubmed: 25390693
Procedia Comput Sci. 2012 Jan 1;9:373-382
pubmed: 22723811
J Comput Biol. 2018 Nov;25(11):1220-1230
pubmed: 30117746
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24896
pubmed: 21949782
Nature. 2001 Dec 6;414(6864):611-6
pubmed: 11740552
Cell. 2007 Jul 13;130(1):141-52
pubmed: 17632061
Kybernetik. 1972 Dec;12(1):30-9
pubmed: 4663624
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185443
pubmed: 28973031
PLoS Biol. 2004 Sep;2(9):E271
pubmed: 15340490
Genetics. 2004 Aug;167(4):1721-37
pubmed: 15342511
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 10;106(10):3823-8
pubmed: 19237583
Dev Biol. 2010 Sep 1;345(1):12-7
pubmed: 20580703
Cell. 1988 Jul 1;54(1):95-104
pubmed: 3383245
Biosystems. 2018 Nov;173:207-213
pubmed: 30315821
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Mar;5(3):e1000303
pubmed: 19282965
Res Lett Signal Process. 2008 Jan 1;2008:
pubmed: 21152265
EMBO J. 2000 Mar 1;19(5):997-1009
pubmed: 10698941
J Theor Biol. 2012 Feb 7;294:130-8
pubmed: 22094361
J Cell Biol. 2006 Apr 24;173(2):219-30
pubmed: 16636144
Development. 2014 Jan;141(1):124-35
pubmed: 24284208
J Theor Biol. 1969 Oct;25(1):1-47
pubmed: 4390734
EMBO J. 1997 Apr 1;16(7):1751-8
pubmed: 9130719
Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Feb;25(4):1501-10
pubmed: 15684399
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 20;102(51):18403-7
pubmed: 16352710
J Theor Biol. 2010 Jun 7;264(3):847-53
pubmed: 20230838
Bioinformatics. 2012 Feb 1;28(3):366-72
pubmed: 22130592
Curr Biol. 2008 Jul 22;18(14):1055-61
pubmed: 18639459
Development. 2009 Feb;136(4):605-14
pubmed: 19168676
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 5;102(14):4960-5
pubmed: 15793007
Development. 2010 Jan;137(1):169-76
pubmed: 20023172
PLoS Biol. 2009 Mar;7(3):e1000049
pubmed: 19750121
EMBO J. 2000 Mar 15;19(6):1366-77
pubmed: 10716936
Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Apr;2(4):185-90
pubmed: 10783235
Cell. 1988 Jul 1;54(1):83-93
pubmed: 3383244
Development. 1989;107 Suppl:13-9
pubmed: 2483989
J Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;127(6 Pt 1):1637-53
pubmed: 7798318
Cell. 1986 Dec 5;47(5):735-46
pubmed: 2877746
C R Biol. 2014 Dec;337(12):679-82
pubmed: 25433559
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2012 Sep-Oct;1(5):715-30
pubmed: 23799569
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:689745
pubmed: 25945341
Nature. 1970 Jan 31;225(5231):420-2
pubmed: 5411117
Fly (Austin). 2011 Jul-Sep;5(3):242-6
pubmed: 21525787
Cell. 2004 Jan 23;116(2):143-52
pubmed: 14744427
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993 Aug;3(4):595-605
pubmed: 8241771
J Digit Imaging. 2004 Sep;17(3):205-16
pubmed: 15534753
Development. 2010 Jul;137(14):2253-64
pubmed: 20570935
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 21;5(4):e10275
pubmed: 20422054
Development. 2011 Nov;138(21):4661-71
pubmed: 21989913
Cell. 1994 Dec 30;79(7):1221-32
pubmed: 8001156
Curr Biol. 2002 Dec 10;12(23):1971-81
pubmed: 12477385
Cell Rep. 2016 Mar 15;14(10):2451-62
pubmed: 26947065
Nat Cell Biol. 2012 Dec;14(12):1305-13
pubmed: 23178881
PLoS One. 2010 May 27;5(5):e10743
pubmed: 20523731
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2012 Dec;22(6):542-6
pubmed: 22981910
Hereditas. 2019 Sep 10;156:30
pubmed: 31528161
Elife. 2016 Feb 17;5:
pubmed: 26883601
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 1;91(5):1878-82
pubmed: 8127899
J Cell Biol. 2000 Feb 7;148(3):427-40
pubmed: 10662770
PLoS Biol. 2011 Mar;9(3):e1000596
pubmed: 21390295
Dev Cell. 2003 Jan;4(1):41-51
pubmed: 12530962
Development. 2011 Jul;138(13):2741-9
pubmed: 21613328
Nature. 2002 Feb 14;415(6873):798-802
pubmed: 11845210
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Aug;10(8):509-12
pubmed: 19626044
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Feb 03;7(2):e1001069
pubmed: 21304932