Ureteral stents cannot decrease the incidence of ureteroileal anastomotic stricture and leakage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

International journal of surgery (London, England)
ISSN: 1743-9159
Titre abrégé: Int J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101228232

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 26 03 2021
revised: 08 06 2021
accepted: 10 08 2021
pubmed: 21 8 2021
medline: 16 10 2021
entrez: 20 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The ileal conduit and ileal orthotopic neobladder were the most popular methods for urinary diversion following radical cystectomy. Stenting the anastomosis of ileo-ureter or ureter-neobladder was a common practice. However, it is still controversial if ureteral stents could prevent complications such as ureteroileal anastomosis stricture (UIAS) and ureteroileal anastomosis leakage (UIAL) after ureteral anastomosis. This study aims to investigate the role of the ureteral stent in preventing UIAS and UIAL. We systematically searched the related studies in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to June 2020. Cohort studies that identified the use of stent and the incidence of UIAS or UIAL were recorded. Comparative meta-analysis was conducted on four cohort studies for comparison of UIAS and UIAL between the stented and nonstented groups. Besides, eleven studies which reported the events of UIAS and UIAL were used for meta-analysis of single proportion. A total of 11 studies were qualified for analysis. Comparative meta-analysis identified that the incidence of UIAS was higher in the stented group than that in the nonstented group, but this did not reach a significant difference (odds ratio [OR]: 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-3.05; P = 0.12). Besides, there was no difference in the incidences of UIAL between the stented and the nonstented groups. On meta-analysis of single proportion, the incidence of UIAS was 7% (95% CI: 3%-10%) in the stented group and 3% (95% CI: 1%-6%) in the nonstented group. The UIAL rate was 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) in stented patients and 2% (95% CI, 1%-4%) in nonstented patients. Stenting the ureteroileal anastomosis resulted in a higher incidence of UIAS. There is no evidence to support ureteral stents could prevent the occurrence of UIAL after urinary diversion.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The ileal conduit and ileal orthotopic neobladder were the most popular methods for urinary diversion following radical cystectomy. Stenting the anastomosis of ileo-ureter or ureter-neobladder was a common practice. However, it is still controversial if ureteral stents could prevent complications such as ureteroileal anastomosis stricture (UIAS) and ureteroileal anastomosis leakage (UIAL) after ureteral anastomosis.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
This study aims to investigate the role of the ureteral stent in preventing UIAS and UIAL.
DATA SOURCES METHODS
We systematically searched the related studies in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to June 2020.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA METHODS
Cohort studies that identified the use of stent and the incidence of UIAS or UIAL were recorded.
DATA SYNTHESIS RESULTS
Comparative meta-analysis was conducted on four cohort studies for comparison of UIAS and UIAL between the stented and nonstented groups. Besides, eleven studies which reported the events of UIAS and UIAL were used for meta-analysis of single proportion.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 11 studies were qualified for analysis. Comparative meta-analysis identified that the incidence of UIAS was higher in the stented group than that in the nonstented group, but this did not reach a significant difference (odds ratio [OR]: 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-3.05; P = 0.12). Besides, there was no difference in the incidences of UIAL between the stented and the nonstented groups. On meta-analysis of single proportion, the incidence of UIAS was 7% (95% CI: 3%-10%) in the stented group and 3% (95% CI: 1%-6%) in the nonstented group. The UIAL rate was 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) in stented patients and 2% (95% CI, 1%-4%) in nonstented patients.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Stenting the ureteroileal anastomosis resulted in a higher incidence of UIAS. There is no evidence to support ureteral stents could prevent the occurrence of UIAL after urinary diversion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34416355
pii: S1743-9191(21)00192-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106058
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106058

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Yu-Lu Peng (YL)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.

Kang Ning (K)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.

Ze-Shen Wu (ZS)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.

Zhi-Yong Li (ZY)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.

Min-Hua Deng (MH)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.

Long-Bin Xiong (LB)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.

Chun-Ping Yu (CP)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.

Zhi-Ling Zhang (ZL)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.

Zhuo-Wei Liu (ZW)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.

Hui-Ming Lu (HM)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China. Electronic address: luhm@sysucc.org.cn.

Fang-Jian Zhou (FJ)

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China. Electronic address: zhoufj@sysucc.org.cn.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH