Modern contraceptive use among women in need of family planning in India: an analysis of the inequalities related to the mix of methods used.


Journal

Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 14 01 2021
accepted: 05 08 2021
entrez: 22 8 2021
pubmed: 23 8 2021
medline: 25 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To evaluate the type of contraceptives used by women in need of family planning in India and the inequalities associated with that use according to women's age, education, wealth, subnational region of residence and empowerment level. Using data from the Indian National Family and Health Survey-4 (2015-2016), we evaluated the proportion of partnered women aged 15-49 years with demand for family planning satisfied (DFPS) with modern contraceptive methods. We also explored the share of each type of contraception [short- (e.g., condom, pill) and long-acting (i.e., IUD) reversible contraceptives and permanent methods] and related inequalities. The majority (71.8%; 95% CI 71.4-72.2) of women in need of contraception were using a modern method, most (76.1%) in the form of female sterilization. Condom and contraceptive pill were the second and third most frequently used methods (11.8% and 8.5%, respectively); only 3.2% reported IUD. There was a nearly linear exchange from short-acting to permanent contraceptive methods as women aged. Women in the poorest wealth quintile had DFPS with modern methods at least 10 percentage points lower than other women. We observed wide geographic variation in DFPS with modern contraceptives, ranging from 23.6% (95% CI 22.1-25.2) in Manipur to 93.6% (95% CI 92.8-94.3) in Andhra Pradesh. Women with more accepting attitudes towards domestic violence and lower levels of social independence had higher DFPS with modern methods but also had higher reliance on permanent methods. Among sterilized women, 43.2% (95% CI 42.7-43.7) were sterilized before age 25, 61.5% (95% CI 61.0-62.1) received monetary compensation for sterilization, and 20.8% (95% CI 20.3-21.3) were not informed that sterilization prevented future pregnancies. Indian family planning policy should prioritize women-centered care, making reversible contraceptive methods widely available and promoted. Ensuring universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights for all women is one of the Sustainable Development Goals, promoted by the United Nations and adopted by 193 countries, including India. To address women’s need for contraception, the provision of a wide range of safe, effective and affordable contraceptive methods is essential. In this study, we evaluated the type of contraceptives used by women in need of contraception in India and the inequalities in contraceptive use among different subgroups of women. The majority (71.8%) of women in need of contraception were using a modern method, most (76.1%) in the form of female sterilization. Condom and contraceptive pill were the second and third most frequently used methods (11.8% and 8.5%, respectively); only 3.2% reported IUD. We observed an exchange from short-acting to permanent contraceptive methods as women aged. The poorest women presented demand for family planning satisfied (DFPS) with modern methods at least 10 percentage points lower than other women. There was wide geographic variation in DFPS with modern contraceptives, ranging from 23.6% in Manipur to 93.6% in Andhra Pradesh. Women with more accepting attitudes towards domestic violence and lower levels of social independence had higher DFPS with modern methods but also had higher reliance on permanent methods. Among sterilized women, 43.2% were sterilized before age 25, 61.5% received monetary compensation for sterilization, and 20.8% were not informed that sterilization prevented future pregnancies. Indian family planning policy should prioritize women-centered care, making reversible contraceptive methods widely available and promoted.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Ensuring universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights for all women is one of the Sustainable Development Goals, promoted by the United Nations and adopted by 193 countries, including India. To address women’s need for contraception, the provision of a wide range of safe, effective and affordable contraceptive methods is essential. In this study, we evaluated the type of contraceptives used by women in need of contraception in India and the inequalities in contraceptive use among different subgroups of women. The majority (71.8%) of women in need of contraception were using a modern method, most (76.1%) in the form of female sterilization. Condom and contraceptive pill were the second and third most frequently used methods (11.8% and 8.5%, respectively); only 3.2% reported IUD. We observed an exchange from short-acting to permanent contraceptive methods as women aged. The poorest women presented demand for family planning satisfied (DFPS) with modern methods at least 10 percentage points lower than other women. There was wide geographic variation in DFPS with modern contraceptives, ranging from 23.6% in Manipur to 93.6% in Andhra Pradesh. Women with more accepting attitudes towards domestic violence and lower levels of social independence had higher DFPS with modern methods but also had higher reliance on permanent methods. Among sterilized women, 43.2% were sterilized before age 25, 61.5% received monetary compensation for sterilization, and 20.8% were not informed that sterilization prevented future pregnancies. Indian family planning policy should prioritize women-centered care, making reversible contraceptive methods widely available and promoted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34419083
doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01220-w
pii: 10.1186/s12978-021-01220-w
pmc: PMC8379729
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contraceptive Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

173

Subventions

Organisme : Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : OPP1199234
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 101815/Z/13/Z
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Jun;45(2):183-201
pubmed: 24931075
PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0153190
pubmed: 27167981
Reprod Health. 2018 Mar 6;15(1):42
pubmed: 29510682
Reprod Health Matters. 2001 May;9(17):53-62
pubmed: 11468846
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Feb;32(1):68-78
pubmed: 27497139
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020343
pubmed: 33274055
Signs (Chic). 2001;26(3):811-45
pubmed: 17607873
Reprod Health. 2019 Oct 11;16(1):148
pubmed: 31601246
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Feb;7(2):e227-e235
pubmed: 30683240
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;38(4):187-95
pubmed: 23318168
Stud Fam Plann. 1986 May-Jun;17(3):136-45
pubmed: 3726902
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86654
pubmed: 24489759
Asian J Res Soc Sci Humanit. 2015;5(6):18-33
pubmed: 29430437
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Sep 4;18(1):147
pubmed: 30180845
Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 25;16(1):88
pubmed: 31238954
Reprod Health. 2018 Apr 13;15(1):63
pubmed: 29653571
Contraception. 2015 Nov;92(5):420-1
pubmed: 26276245
Lancet. 2014 Dec 20;384(9961):e68-9
pubmed: 25529581
J Health Popul Nutr. 2008 Jun;26(2):241-50
pubmed: 18686557
Stud Fam Plann. 1999 Dec;30(4):288-301
pubmed: 10674325
Cult Health Sex. 2018 Jul;20(7):799-814
pubmed: 29043910
Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 1;17(1):82
pubmed: 32487182
Lancet. 2009 May 30;373(9678):1883-9
pubmed: 19278721

Auteurs

Fernanda Ewerling (F)

International Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. fewerling@equidade.org.
, Marechal Deodoro 1160, 3rd floor, Pelotas, RS, Brazil. fewerling@equidade.org.

Lotus McDougal (L)

Center on Gender Equity and Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.

Anita Raj (A)

Center on Gender Equity and Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.

Leonardo Z Ferreira (LZ)

International Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

Cauane Blumenberg (C)

International Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

Divya Parmar (D)

King's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Aluisio J D Barros (AJD)

International Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH