Association of Tube Voltage With Plaque Composition on Coronary CT Angiography: Results From PARADIGM Registry.


Journal

JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1876-7591
Titre abrégé: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101467978

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 22 04 2021
revised: 06 07 2021
accepted: 08 07 2021
pubmed: 23 8 2021
medline: 22 2 2022
entrez: 22 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study sought to investigate the impact of low tube voltage scanning heterogeneity of coronary luminal attenuation on plaque quantification and characterization with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). The impact of low tube voltage and coronary luminal attenuation on quantitative coronary plaque remains uncertain. A total of 1,236 consecutive patients (age: 60 ± 9 years; 41% female) who underwent serial CCTA at an interval of ≥2 years were included from an international registry. Patients with prior revascularization or nonanalyzable coronary CTAs were excluded. Total coronary plaque volume was assessed and subclassified based on specific Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold: necrotic core, fibrofatty plaque, and fibrous plaque and dense calcium. Luminal attenuation was measured in the aorta. With increasing luminal HU (<350, 350-500, and >500 HU), percent calcified plaque was increased (16%, 27%, and 40% in the median; P < 0.001), and fibrofatty plaque (26%, 13%, and 4%; P < 0.001) and necrotic core (1.6%, 0.3%, and 0.0%; P < 0.001) were decreased. Higher tube voltage scanning (80, 100, and 120 kV) resulted in decreasing luminal attenuation (689 ± 135, 497 ± 89, and 391 ± 73 HU; P < 0.001) and calcified plaque volume (59%, 34%, and 23%; P < 0.001) and increased fibrofatty plaque (3%, 9%, and 18%; P < 0.001) and necrotic core (0.2%, 0.1%, and 0.6%; P < 0.001). Mediation analysis showed that the impact of 100 kV on plaque composition, compared with 120 kV, was primarily caused by an indirect effect through blood pool attenuation. Tube voltage scanning of 80 kV maintained a direct effect on fibrofatty plaque and necrotic core in addition to an indirect effect through the luminal attenuation. Low tube voltage usage affected plaque morphology, mainly through an increase in luminal HU with a resultant increase in calcified plaque and a reduction in fibrofatty and necrotic core. These findings should be considered as CCTA-based plaque measures are being used to guide medical management and, in particular, when being used as a measure of treatment response. (Progression of Atherosclerotic Plaque Determined by Computed Tomographic Angiography Imaging [PARADIGM]; NCT02803411).

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVES
This study sought to investigate the impact of low tube voltage scanning heterogeneity of coronary luminal attenuation on plaque quantification and characterization with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
BACKGROUND
The impact of low tube voltage and coronary luminal attenuation on quantitative coronary plaque remains uncertain.
METHODS
A total of 1,236 consecutive patients (age: 60 ± 9 years; 41% female) who underwent serial CCTA at an interval of ≥2 years were included from an international registry. Patients with prior revascularization or nonanalyzable coronary CTAs were excluded. Total coronary plaque volume was assessed and subclassified based on specific Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold: necrotic core, fibrofatty plaque, and fibrous plaque and dense calcium. Luminal attenuation was measured in the aorta.
RESULTS
With increasing luminal HU (<350, 350-500, and >500 HU), percent calcified plaque was increased (16%, 27%, and 40% in the median; P < 0.001), and fibrofatty plaque (26%, 13%, and 4%; P < 0.001) and necrotic core (1.6%, 0.3%, and 0.0%; P < 0.001) were decreased. Higher tube voltage scanning (80, 100, and 120 kV) resulted in decreasing luminal attenuation (689 ± 135, 497 ± 89, and 391 ± 73 HU; P < 0.001) and calcified plaque volume (59%, 34%, and 23%; P < 0.001) and increased fibrofatty plaque (3%, 9%, and 18%; P < 0.001) and necrotic core (0.2%, 0.1%, and 0.6%; P < 0.001). Mediation analysis showed that the impact of 100 kV on plaque composition, compared with 120 kV, was primarily caused by an indirect effect through blood pool attenuation. Tube voltage scanning of 80 kV maintained a direct effect on fibrofatty plaque and necrotic core in addition to an indirect effect through the luminal attenuation.
CONCLUSIONS
Low tube voltage usage affected plaque morphology, mainly through an increase in luminal HU with a resultant increase in calcified plaque and a reduction in fibrofatty and necrotic core. These findings should be considered as CCTA-based plaque measures are being used to guide medical management and, in particular, when being used as a measure of treatment response. (Progression of Atherosclerotic Plaque Determined by Computed Tomographic Angiography Imaging [PARADIGM]; NCT02803411).

Identifiants

pubmed: 34419398
pii: S1936-878X(21)00564-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.07.011
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02803411']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2429-2440

Subventions

Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/TF/21/33008
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by the Leading Foreign Research Institute Recruitment Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (grant number 2012027176). The study was also funded in part by a grant from the Dalio Foundation (New York, New York). Dr Leipsic receives institutional grants to provide core lab services to Edwards Life Sciences, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic and is a consultant to and has stock options in Circle CVI and HeartFlow. Dr Andreini is on the Speakers Bureau for GE Healthcare and receives grant support from GE Healthcare and Bracco. Dr Budoff has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health and GE Healthcare. Dr Chun has received funding from a National Research Foundation grant funded by the South Korea government (MEST) (NRF- 2015R1D1A1A01059717). Dr Pontone has received institutional research grants from GE Healthcare, HeartFlow, Medtronic, Bracco, and Bayer. Dr Virmani has received institutional research support from 480 Biomedical, Abbott Vascular, ART, BioSensors International, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CeloNova, Claret Medical, Cook Medical, Cordis, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, MicroVention, OrbusNeich, ReCord, SINO Medical Technology, Spectranetics, Surmodics, Terumo Corporation, W.L. Gore, and Xeltis; has received honoraria from 480 Biomedical, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Lutonix, Medtronic, Terumo Corporation, and W.L. Gore; and is a consultant for 480 Biomedical, Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and W.L. Gore. Dr Samady has received grant support from Phillips/Volcano and St. Jude Abbott/Medtronic/Gilead. Dr Berman has received software royalties from Cedars-Sinai. Dr Bax has received unrestricted research grants from Biotronik, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Chang has received funding from the Leading Foreign Research Institute Recruitment Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (grant 2012027176). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Auteurs

Hidenobu Takagi (H)

Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, Miyagi, Japan.

Jonathon A Leipsic (JA)

Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: jleipsic@providencehealth.bc.ca.

Praveen Indraratna (P)

Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Gaurav Gulsin (G)

Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Elina Khasanova (E)

Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Georgios Tzimas (G)

Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Fay Y Lin (FY)

Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Leslee J Shaw (LJ)

Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Sang-Eun Lee (SE)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei-Cedars-Sinai Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, South Korea.

Daniele Andreini (D)

Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere (IRCCS) Milan, Italy.

Mouaz H Al-Mallah (MH)

Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.

Matthew J Budoff (MJ)

Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California, USA.

Filippo Cademartiri (F)

Cardiovascular Imaging Center, IRCCS, Naples, Italy.

Kavitha Chinnaiyan (K)

Department of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mississippi, USA.

Jung Hyun Choi (JH)

Pusan University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.

Edoardo Conte (E)

Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere (IRCCS) Milan, Italy.

Hugo Marques (H)

Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal.

Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves (P)

Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal; Nova Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal.

Ilan Gottlieb (I)

Department of Radiology, Casa de Saude São Jose, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Martin Hadamitzky (M)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center Munich, Munich, Germany.

Erica Maffei (E)

Department of Radiology, Area Vasta 1/Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale Marche, Urbino, Italy.

Gianluca Pontone (G)

Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere (IRCCS) Milan, Italy.

Sanghoon Shin (S)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Yong-Jin Kim (YJ)

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Byoung Kwon Lee (BK)

Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Eun Ju Chun (EJ)

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, South Korea.

Ji Min Sung (JM)

Yonsei-Cedars-Sinai Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, South Korea; Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.

Renu Virmani (R)

Department of Pathology, CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.

Habib Samady (H)

Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Peter H Stone (PH)

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Daniel S Berman (DS)

Department of Imaging and Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Jagat Narula (J)

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Heart, Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, and Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health, New York, New York, USA.

Jeroen J Bax (JJ)

Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Hyuk-Jae Chang (HJ)

Yonsei-Cedars-Sinai Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, South Korea; Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH