Optical coherence tomography tissue coverage and characterization at six months after implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds versus conventional everolimus eluting stents in the ISAR-Absorb MI trial.
Acute myocardial infarction
Bioresorbable scaffold
Grey-scale signal intensity
Malapposition
Optical coherence tomography
Uncovered struts
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
01
12
2020
accepted:
16
04
2021
pubmed:
23
8
2021
medline:
16
10
2021
entrez:
22
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Data regarding vessel healing by optical coherence tomography (OCT) after everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) or everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES) implantation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is scarce. We compared OCT findings after BRS or EES implantation in patients with AMI enrolled in a randomized trial. In ISAR-Absorb MI, AMI patients were randomized to BRS or EES implantation, with 6-8 month angiographic follow-up. This analysis includes patients who underwent OCT during surveillance angiography. Tissue characterization was done using grey-scale signal intensity analysis. The association between OCT findings and target lesion failure (TLF) at 2 years was investigated. OCT was analyzed in 103 patients (2237 frames, 19,827 struts) at a median of 216 days post-implantation. Of these, 70 were treated with BRS versus 32 with EES. Pre-(92.8 vs. 68.7%, p = 0.002) and post-dilation (51.4 vs. 12.5%, p < 0.001) were more common in BRS as compared to EES. Strut coverage was higher in BRS vs. EES (97.5% vs. 90.9%, p < 0.001). Mean neointimal thickness was comparable in both groups [85.5 (61.9, 124.1) vs. 69.5 (32.7, 127.5) µm, respectively, p = 0.20]. Mature neointimal regions were numerically more common in BRS (43.0% vs. 24.6%; p = 0.35); this difference was statistically significant in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients (40.9% vs. 21.1%, p = 0.03). At two-years, 8 (7.8%) patients experienced TLF. Mean neointimal area [0.61 (0.21, 1.33) vs. 0.41 (0.11, 0.75) mm In selected patients who underwent OCT surveillance 6-8 months after coronary intervention for AMI with differing implantation characteristics depending on the device type used, vessel healing was more advanced in BRS compared with EES, particularly in the STEMI subgroup.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34420177
doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02251-x
pii: 10.1007/s10554-021-02251-x
pmc: PMC8494721
doi:
Substances chimiques
Everolimus
9HW64Q8G6G
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2815-2826Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1905-15
pubmed: 26457558
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 27;9(12):1231-1242
pubmed: 27262861
Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3332-42
pubmed: 26330419
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Mar 20;59(12):1058-72
pubmed: 22421299
EuroIntervention. 2020 Mar 20;15(16):1451-1457
pubmed: 30719976
Eur Heart J. 1998 Aug;19(8):1214-23
pubmed: 9740343
Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):781-792
pubmed: 28831994
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):167-176
pubmed: 30520980
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1530-1540
pubmed: 30266412
Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 1;258:42-49
pubmed: 29544956
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2319-2328
pubmed: 28402237
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 7;70(19):2330-2344
pubmed: 29096803
EuroIntervention. 2018 Aug 20;14(6):678-685
pubmed: 29488886
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 3;65(8):791-801
pubmed: 25720622
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;125(11):1624-1630
pubmed: 32279841
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):229-40
pubmed: 26405232
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Dec 1;4(12):1261-1269
pubmed: 31561250
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2479-2491
pubmed: 27806897
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;66(21):2298-2309
pubmed: 26471805
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013 Jun;33(6):1376-83
pubmed: 23539216
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;30(3):495-504
pubmed: 24452729
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jun;33(11):1325-33
pubmed: 22507972