The place of the dead, the time of dictatorship: Nostalgia, sovereignty, and the corpse of Ferdinand Marcos.
Authoritarian nostalgia
Ferdinand Marcos
Philippines
Rodrigo Duterte
democracy
sovereignty
Journal
Environment and planning. D, Society & space
ISSN: 0263-7758
Titre abrégé: Environ Plan D
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101094318
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
entrez:
23
8
2021
pubmed:
24
8
2021
medline:
24
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In 1993, the body of former Philippine dictator, Ferdinand E Marcos, was moved from Honolulu, Hawaii, where he died in exile, to a private mausoleum attached to his ancestral home in Batac, Ilocos Norte. Preserved and placed in a refrigerated coffin while his wife, Imelda, lobbied for his burial at the Heroes' Cemetery, Marcos's body remained on display until 2016, when permission for his interment was granted by the newly elected president, Rodrigo Duterte. Drawing on fieldwork conducted at the Marcos Mausoleum prior to the controversial burial and at the protests that came in its wake, this essay examines the sense of loss and longing that has animated the rise of authoritarian nostalgia. Banished yet unburied, the dictator's embalmed corpse, I suggest, speaks to what remains unmourned under democracy and which thus always threatens to return-namely, a figure of unfettered freedom and authority, whose power might be said to extend over life, death, and time itself. I argue that it is this figure-the figure of a sovereign gone missing-that authoritarian nostalgia takes as its object and which grows more seductive in light of the hollowing out of popular sovereignty that has come to define the post-revolutionary experience.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34421166
doi: 10.1177/02637758211013038
pii: 10.1177_02637758211013038
pmc: PMC8369899
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
722-739Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.