Internal mammary lymph node siliconoma in absence of prosthesis rupture: a case series that raises concern for potential risk of overdiagnosis.

Siliconoma breast cancer breast implant case series internal mammary lymph node (IMLN)

Journal

Gland surgery
ISSN: 2227-684X
Titre abrégé: Gland Surg
Pays: China (Republic : 1949- )
ID NLM: 101606638

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 29 11 2020
accepted: 11 05 2021
entrez: 23 8 2021
pubmed: 24 8 2021
medline: 24 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Silicon migration after rupture is an adverse event of breast implant, whose risk increases with the aging of prosthesis. The exact prevalence of this complication remains unclear and reported data are inconsistent. In addition, microscopic diffusion of silicone gel through intact implant, known as gel bleeding, might verify thus complicating diagnosis. Although high cohesive gel has reduced the occurrence of gel bleeding, this phenomenon is still possible and its occurrence rate remains underestimated. If silicon droplets migrate in locoregional lymph node, a swelling that mimics recurrence can arise. Therefore, a risk of overdiagnosis is possible when clinicians rely only on imaging techniques. The aim of this study is to evaluate the actual prevalence of metastasis in internal mammary lymph node (IMLN) in presence of PET positive uptake and no prosthesis rupture. We retrospectively evaluated our patient's records and selected those with intact breast implants and suspected relapse in IMLN that underwent biopsy, either surgical or imaging guided. All patients performed PET/CT scan showing pathological uptake in IMLNs. A breast magnetic resonance (MRI) or ultrasound (US) imaging confirmed a suspicious adenopathy and excluded prosthesis rupture. From 2015 to 2019 a total of nine patients underwent biopsy of the IMLN and only six of them met inclusion criteria. Four biopsies were CT-guided, two were surgical. Three patients (50%) were diagnosed with breast cancer relapse while two (33.3%) were found with siliconoma and one (16.7%) was inflammatory. Siliconoma can occur even without evidence of capsule rupture, challenging the clinicians and leading to a risk of relapse over diagnosis. Echographic, MRI and nuclear medicine imaging criteria may be not sufficient in differential diagnosis. To overcome the issue, we suggest introducing into the clinical practice the biopsy of suspicious enlarged IMLN with minimally invasive technique.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Silicon migration after rupture is an adverse event of breast implant, whose risk increases with the aging of prosthesis. The exact prevalence of this complication remains unclear and reported data are inconsistent. In addition, microscopic diffusion of silicone gel through intact implant, known as gel bleeding, might verify thus complicating diagnosis. Although high cohesive gel has reduced the occurrence of gel bleeding, this phenomenon is still possible and its occurrence rate remains underestimated. If silicon droplets migrate in locoregional lymph node, a swelling that mimics recurrence can arise. Therefore, a risk of overdiagnosis is possible when clinicians rely only on imaging techniques. The aim of this study is to evaluate the actual prevalence of metastasis in internal mammary lymph node (IMLN) in presence of PET positive uptake and no prosthesis rupture.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively evaluated our patient's records and selected those with intact breast implants and suspected relapse in IMLN that underwent biopsy, either surgical or imaging guided. All patients performed PET/CT scan showing pathological uptake in IMLNs. A breast magnetic resonance (MRI) or ultrasound (US) imaging confirmed a suspicious adenopathy and excluded prosthesis rupture. From 2015 to 2019 a total of nine patients underwent biopsy of the IMLN and only six of them met inclusion criteria.
RESULTS RESULTS
Four biopsies were CT-guided, two were surgical. Three patients (50%) were diagnosed with breast cancer relapse while two (33.3%) were found with siliconoma and one (16.7%) was inflammatory.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Siliconoma can occur even without evidence of capsule rupture, challenging the clinicians and leading to a risk of relapse over diagnosis. Echographic, MRI and nuclear medicine imaging criteria may be not sufficient in differential diagnosis. To overcome the issue, we suggest introducing into the clinical practice the biopsy of suspicious enlarged IMLN with minimally invasive technique.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34422583
doi: 10.21037/gs-20-860
pii: gs-10-07-2123
pmc: PMC8340343
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2123-2129

Informations de copyright

2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-860). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Breast J. 2008 Nov-Dec;14(6):532-7
pubmed: 19054000
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(52):e9466
pubmed: 29384935
J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Dec;193(6):709-13
pubmed: 11768690
Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 7:vii11-9
pubmed: 22997442
Clin Nucl Med. 2003 Sep;28(9):755-6
pubmed: 12972998
Breast. 2011 Apr;20(2):129-33
pubmed: 21036614
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Sep;116(3):768-79; discussion 780-1
pubmed: 16141814
Eur J Cancer. 1999 Sep;35(9):1320-5
pubmed: 10658521
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;35(5):891-900
pubmed: 21487917
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Apr;37(4):969-975
pubmed: 28960388
Insights Imaging. 2011 Dec;2(6):653-670
pubmed: 22347984
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2013 Nov;5(6):334-50
pubmed: 24179488
Future Oncol. 2016 Dec;12(23s):13-18
pubmed: 27686131
Cancer. 1976 Jan;37(1):206-14
pubmed: 1247957
Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Apr;29(4):506-11
pubmed: 15767806
Arch Surg. 2003 Jul;138(7):801-6
pubmed: 12860765
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Jul 30;6:703-9
pubmed: 25114595
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2006 Aug;38(4):224-32
pubmed: 16991042
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9
pubmed: 18313558
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Oct;17(4):703-10
pubmed: 2550398
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Apr;196(4):W451-60
pubmed: 21427311
Eur Radiol. 2003 Jul;13(7):1635-44
pubmed: 12835979
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):452-478
pubmed: 32259783

Auteurs

Valentina Errico (V)

Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Gianluca Perroni (G)

Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.

Flavio Milana (F)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa (AVE)

Plastic Surgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Emilia Marrazzo (E)

Breast Unit Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Marco Klinger (M)

Plastic Surgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine Biometra, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Corrado Tinterri (C)

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Breast Unit Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Alberto Testori (A)

Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH