Establishing conservation units to promote recovery of two threatened freshwater mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionida:
DPHS
conservation genetics
endangered species
population genomics
recovery
Journal
Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
19
10
2020
revised:
11
05
2021
accepted:
28
06
2021
entrez:
25
8
2021
pubmed:
26
8
2021
medline:
26
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Population genomics has significantly increased our ability to make inferences about microevolutionary processes and demographic histories, which have the potential to improve protection and recovery of imperiled species. Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida) represent one of the most imperiled groups of organisms globally. Despite systemic decline of mussel abundance and diversity, studies evaluating spatiotemporal changes in distribution, demographic histories, and ecological factors that threaten long-term persistence of imperiled species remain lacking. In this study, we use genotype-by-sequencing (GBS) and mitochondrial sequence data (mtDNA) to define conservation units (CUs) for two highly imperiled freshwater mussel species,
Identifiants
pubmed: 34429906
doi: 10.1002/ece3.7897
pii: ECE37897
pmc: PMC8366875
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
11102-11122Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.
Références
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Jan;22(1):11-6
pubmed: 16982114
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Jul;28(1):1-11
pubmed: 12801467
Mol Ecol. 2008 May;17(9):2149-63
pubmed: 18410287
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 Mar;16(2):540-8
pubmed: 26417651
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Oct;11(10):697-709
pubmed: 20847747
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Jan;14(1):209-14
pubmed: 23992227
Nature. 2014 Nov 13;515(7526):261-3
pubmed: 25141177
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Aug;29(8):1917-32
pubmed: 22422763
Genetics. 2014 Jun;197(2):573-89
pubmed: 24700103
Evol Appl. 2008 Aug;1(3):462-74
pubmed: 25567728
Nat Rev Genet. 2003 Dec;4(12):981-94
pubmed: 14631358
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3299-3302
pubmed: 29029172
Ecol Evol. 2017 Oct 16;7(22):9613-9623
pubmed: 29187994
Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Jan;16(1):37-48
pubmed: 10331250
Mol Ecol. 2018 Dec;27(24):5195-5213
pubmed: 30403418
Syst Biol. 2018 Sep 1;67(5):901-904
pubmed: 29718447
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 15;28(24):3326-8
pubmed: 23060615
PLoS One. 2011 May 04;6(5):e19379
pubmed: 21573248
BMC Evol Biol. 2017 Feb 6;17(1):42
pubmed: 28166715
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Sep;27(9):489-96
pubmed: 22727017
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Feb;119:50-62
pubmed: 29074460
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 10;10(4):e1003537
pubmed: 24722319
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Jul;17(7):422-33
pubmed: 27265362
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 18;9(1):10409
pubmed: 31320723
Ecol Evol. 2016 Mar 11;6(8):2439-52
pubmed: 27066233
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):3070-1
pubmed: 21926124
Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):564-7
pubmed: 21565059
Environ Pollut. 2013 Feb;173:157-67
pubmed: 23202646
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Oct;9(10):373-5
pubmed: 21236896
Ambio. 2005 Mar;34(2):111-9
pubmed: 15865307
BMC Genet. 2010 Oct 15;11:94
pubmed: 20950446
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 1;24(11):1403-5
pubmed: 18397895
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 29;101(26):9915-20
pubmed: 15192146
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 26;8(1):15892
pubmed: 30367102
Syst Biol. 2014 Jul;63(4):534-42
pubmed: 24627183
Mol Ecol. 2015 Apr;24(8):1910-26
pubmed: 25782031
Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
pubmed: 10835412
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;888:67-89
pubmed: 22665276
Mol Ecol. 2015 Jun;24(12):2993-3008
pubmed: 25943487
Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Sep;13(5):946-52
pubmed: 23738873
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Jan;29(1):51-63
pubmed: 24139972
Mol Ecol. 2017 Jul;26(14):3594-3602
pubmed: 28544181
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Feb;86(1):225-47
pubmed: 20608928
Mol Ecol Resour. 2018 May;18(3):691-699
pubmed: 29266847