Out-of-Pocket Costs for Facility-Based Obstetrical Care in Rural Guatemala.
Journal
Annals of global health
ISSN: 2214-9996
Titre abrégé: Ann Glob Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620864
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
entrez:
25
8
2021
pubmed:
26
8
2021
medline:
30
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rural Indigenous Maya communities in Guatemala have some of the worst obstetrical health outcomes in Latin America, due to widespread discrimination in healthcare and an underfunded public sector. Multiple systems-level efforts to improve facility birth outcomes have been implemented, primarily focusing on early community-based detection of obstetrical complications and on reducing discrimination and improving the quality of facility-level care. However, another important feature of public facility-level care are the out-of-pocket payments that patients are often required to make for care. To estimate the burden of out-of-pocket costs for public obstetrical care in Indigenous Maya communities in Guatemala. We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical record data on obstetrical referrals collected as part of an obstetrical care navigation intervention, which included documentation of out-of-pocket costs by care navigators accompanying patients within public facilities. We compared the median costs for both emergency and routine obstetrical facility care. Cost data on 709 obstetric referrals from 479 patients were analyzed (65% emergency and 35% routine referrals). The median OOP costs were Q100 (IQR 75-150) [$13 USD] and Q50 (IQR 16-120) [$6.50 USD] for emergency and routine referrals. Costs for transport were most common (95% and 55%, respectively). Costs for medication, supply, laboratory, and imaging costs occurred less frequently. Food and lodging costs were minimal. Out-of-pocket payments for theoretically free public care are a common and important barrier to care for this rural Guatemalan setting. These data add to the literature in Latin American on the barriers to obstetrical care faced by Indigenous and rural women.
Sections du résumé
Background
Rural Indigenous Maya communities in Guatemala have some of the worst obstetrical health outcomes in Latin America, due to widespread discrimination in healthcare and an underfunded public sector. Multiple systems-level efforts to improve facility birth outcomes have been implemented, primarily focusing on early community-based detection of obstetrical complications and on reducing discrimination and improving the quality of facility-level care. However, another important feature of public facility-level care are the out-of-pocket payments that patients are often required to make for care.
Objective
To estimate the burden of out-of-pocket costs for public obstetrical care in Indigenous Maya communities in Guatemala.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical record data on obstetrical referrals collected as part of an obstetrical care navigation intervention, which included documentation of out-of-pocket costs by care navigators accompanying patients within public facilities. We compared the median costs for both emergency and routine obstetrical facility care.
Findings
Cost data on 709 obstetric referrals from 479 patients were analyzed (65% emergency and 35% routine referrals). The median OOP costs were Q100 (IQR 75-150) [$13 USD] and Q50 (IQR 16-120) [$6.50 USD] for emergency and routine referrals. Costs for transport were most common (95% and 55%, respectively). Costs for medication, supply, laboratory, and imaging costs occurred less frequently. Food and lodging costs were minimal.
Conclusion
Out-of-pocket payments for theoretically free public care are a common and important barrier to care for this rural Guatemalan setting. These data add to the literature in Latin American on the barriers to obstetrical care faced by Indigenous and rural women.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34430225
doi: 10.5334/aogh.3223
pmc: PMC8344954
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
75Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Références
Reprod Health. 2018 Jan 11;15(1):9
pubmed: 29325572
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Apr;62(8):1958-69
pubmed: 16225975
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Feb;29(2):169-178
pubmed: 31678958
Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Dec;13(12):1442-51
pubmed: 18983268
Med Anthropol. 2008 Apr-Jun;27(2):164-89
pubmed: 18464128
Health Econ Rev. 2019 Mar 27;9(1):11
pubmed: 30919219
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):948
pubmed: 31307419
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Jul;24(4):289-300
pubmed: 19346273
Reprod Health. 2016 Aug 24;13(1):99
pubmed: 27557904
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Apr 28;45:e63
pubmed: 33936186
Int J Equity Health. 2016 May 13;15:77
pubmed: 27177690
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Mar 25;4(1):114-31
pubmed: 27016548
Health Policy. 2011 May;100(2-3):159-66
pubmed: 21168931
J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Jul;21(5):283-91
pubmed: 25766857
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Jan 20;10:2
pubmed: 20085662
J Family Med Prim Care. 2017 Jul-Sep;6(3):477-481
pubmed: 29416992
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e022380
pubmed: 30478109