Clinical prognostic factors in surgically treated oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Oligometastatic (OM) lung cancer prognosis surgery systematic review

Journal

Translational lung cancer research
ISSN: 2218-6751
Titre abrégé: Transl Lung Cancer Res
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101646875

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 16 10 2020
accepted: 19 04 2021
entrez: 25 8 2021
pubmed: 26 8 2021
medline: 26 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Since the concept of oligometastatic (OM) disease was introduced in the oncological scenario of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), these patients progressively became a new category of stage IV NSCLC in whom the multimodality approach, including surgery, may improve prognosis. This systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical prognostic factors in OM-NSCLC surgically treated with radical intent. This systematic review is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Cochrane's Collaboration Tool was used to determine the risk of bias for the included studies' primary outcome. A search strategy using a combination of free-text words, relevant MeSH headings and appropriate restrictions (time limit: from January 1997 to March 2020, language: English) was designed. Potentially qualified papers were subjected to an in-depth full-text examination after preliminary title/abstract screening to identify studies for inclusion in the systematic review. Data extracted included: study characteristics, baseline patient characteristics, primary and secondary outcomes. The Cochrane's Collaboration Tool was used to determine the risk of bias for included studies' primary outcome. The risk of bias due to incomplete outcome data was evaluated at an outcome level. However, at the study stage, the possibility of bias due to sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, selective reporting, or funding was assessed. Two independent observers calculated the probability of bias, and differences were resolved through dialogue and consensus. Nine studies were selected. Overall survival (OS) was 51.8 months and varied from 21.1 to 60 months, but results were not statistically significant. Positive prognostic factors for survival were cessation of smoking, age <60, a histologic grade of G1/G2, pN0. The presence of extra-brain OM and multiple metastases negatively affected survival. For otherwise stable patients with a single organ site with synchronous (or metachronous) extrathoracic M1 disease and no intrathoracic lymph node involvement, aggressive treatment should be used in the absence of randomized evidence to help determine the effective management of OM-NSCLC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Since the concept of oligometastatic (OM) disease was introduced in the oncological scenario of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), these patients progressively became a new category of stage IV NSCLC in whom the multimodality approach, including surgery, may improve prognosis. This systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical prognostic factors in OM-NSCLC surgically treated with radical intent.
METHODS METHODS
This systematic review is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Cochrane's Collaboration Tool was used to determine the risk of bias for the included studies' primary outcome. A search strategy using a combination of free-text words, relevant MeSH headings and appropriate restrictions (time limit: from January 1997 to March 2020, language: English) was designed. Potentially qualified papers were subjected to an in-depth full-text examination after preliminary title/abstract screening to identify studies for inclusion in the systematic review. Data extracted included: study characteristics, baseline patient characteristics, primary and secondary outcomes. The Cochrane's Collaboration Tool was used to determine the risk of bias for included studies' primary outcome. The risk of bias due to incomplete outcome data was evaluated at an outcome level. However, at the study stage, the possibility of bias due to sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, selective reporting, or funding was assessed. Two independent observers calculated the probability of bias, and differences were resolved through dialogue and consensus.
RESULTS RESULTS
Nine studies were selected. Overall survival (OS) was 51.8 months and varied from 21.1 to 60 months, but results were not statistically significant. Positive prognostic factors for survival were cessation of smoking, age <60, a histologic grade of G1/G2, pN0. The presence of extra-brain OM and multiple metastases negatively affected survival.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
For otherwise stable patients with a single organ site with synchronous (or metachronous) extrathoracic M1 disease and no intrathoracic lymph node involvement, aggressive treatment should be used in the absence of randomized evidence to help determine the effective management of OM-NSCLC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34430375
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1123
pii: tlcr-10-07-3401
pmc: PMC8350109
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

3401-3408

Informations de copyright

2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-1123). The series “Oligometastatic NSCLC: definition and treatment opportunities” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Ann Surg Oncol. 2001 Sep;8(8):663-6
pubmed: 11569782
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:356-387
pubmed: 30100160
Lung Cancer. 2013 Nov;82(2):197-203
pubmed: 24051084
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 1;57(6):1166-1172
pubmed: 32011665
Oncologist. 2010;15(10):1102-12
pubmed: 20930102
Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2016 Nov 04;7:129-140
pubmed: 28210169
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;98(1):249-56
pubmed: 24820385
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
pubmed: 19621070
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Feb 01;12:9
pubmed: 22297116
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 10;31(23):2895-902
pubmed: 23835707
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan;13(1):8-10
pubmed: 7799047
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Nov;75(11):963-6
pubmed: 16336388
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(7):1814-1817
pubmed: 28839972
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Aug;144(2):444-52
pubmed: 22713303
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec;11(12):5463-5473
pubmed: 32030265
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 1;57(6):1173-1180
pubmed: 32091083
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Sep;11(Suppl 15):S2023-S2025
pubmed: 31632815
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Apr;107(4):1053-1059
pubmed: 30476480
Appl Clin Inform. 2010;1(1):32-37
pubmed: 21991298
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Dec;10(12):6540-6546
pubmed: 30746198
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1672-1682
pubmed: 27789196
Lung Cancer. 2013 Oct;82(1):95-102
pubmed: 23973202
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Oct;12(11):1004-12
pubmed: 21933749
Acta Oncol. 2009;48(2):233-7
pubmed: 18752085
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;62(7):612-5
pubmed: 25136943
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):141-51
pubmed: 25589191

Auteurs

Luca Bertolaccini (L)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Monica Casiraghi (M)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Giulia Sedda (G)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Filippo de Marinis (F)

Department of Thoracic Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Lorenzo Spaggiari (L)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH