Re-evaluating the nasal cycle by long-term rhinoflowmetry: most individuals demonstrate a 'mixed' nasal cycle.
Journal
Rhinology
ISSN: 0300-0729
Titre abrégé: Rhinology
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0347242
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2021
01 Dec 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
26
8
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
25
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The nasal cycle seems to be more complex than a strictly alternating swelling of the nasal mucosa. Long-term rhinoflowmetry (LRFM) allows continuous investigation of changes in nasal airflow over 24 hours (24h). We evaluated the various types of nasal cycle with LRFM over 24 hours and investigated the influence of age and gender. LRFM was continuously performed over 24h in 55 rhinologically healthy subjects (36 female, 19 male). The LRFM flow curves were examined for phases of the 'classical' 'in-concert' 'one-side' and'no-cycle' cycle types. Subjects were divided into 4 age subgroups (19-29; 30-49; 50-69; >70 years). Correlations of age and gender with the individual cycle forms were analyzed. 85.5% of the subjects presented a 'mixed' nasal cycle within 24h. 'classical' nasal cycle was seen most often (92.7% vs. 'in-concert' 56.4% vs. 'one-sided' 18.2% vs. 'no-cycle' 5.5%). Older age groups significantly more often presented the 'no-cycle' type. A tendency was seen towards a mixed nasal cycle with increasing age. The mixed nasal cycle was significantly more often seen in the female subjects. LRFM is an easy-to-use measurement tool. The 'mixed' nasal cycle predominates. However, all 4 different cycle types can be detected, alternating over 24h in each subject. Moreover, the cycle type varies with age.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The nasal cycle seems to be more complex than a strictly alternating swelling of the nasal mucosa. Long-term rhinoflowmetry (LRFM) allows continuous investigation of changes in nasal airflow over 24 hours (24h). We evaluated the various types of nasal cycle with LRFM over 24 hours and investigated the influence of age and gender.
METHODS
METHODS
LRFM was continuously performed over 24h in 55 rhinologically healthy subjects (36 female, 19 male). The LRFM flow curves were examined for phases of the 'classical' 'in-concert' 'one-side' and'no-cycle' cycle types. Subjects were divided into 4 age subgroups (19-29; 30-49; 50-69; >70 years). Correlations of age and gender with the individual cycle forms were analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
85.5% of the subjects presented a 'mixed' nasal cycle within 24h. 'classical' nasal cycle was seen most often (92.7% vs. 'in-concert' 56.4% vs. 'one-sided' 18.2% vs. 'no-cycle' 5.5%). Older age groups significantly more often presented the 'no-cycle' type. A tendency was seen towards a mixed nasal cycle with increasing age. The mixed nasal cycle was significantly more often seen in the female subjects.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
LRFM is an easy-to-use measurement tool. The 'mixed' nasal cycle predominates. However, all 4 different cycle types can be detected, alternating over 24h in each subject. Moreover, the cycle type varies with age.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34432862
pii: 2921
doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.101
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM