Co-designing a dashboard of predictive analytics and decision support to drive care quality and client outcomes in aged care: a mixed-method study protocol.
geriatric medicine
health & safety
health informatics
information technology
quality in health care
risk management
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 08 2021
25 08 2021
Historique:
entrez:
26
8
2021
pubmed:
27
8
2021
medline:
15
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a clear need for improved care quality and quality monitoring in aged care. Aged care providers collect an abundance of data, yet rarely are these data integrated and transformed in real-time into actionable information to support evidence-based care, nor are they shared with older people and informal caregivers. This protocol describes the co-design and testing of a dashboard in residential aged care facilities (nursing or care homes) and community-based aged care settings (formal care provided at home or in the community). The dashboard will comprise integrated data to provide an 'at-a-glance' overview of aged care clients, indicators to identify clients at risk of fall-related hospitalisations and poor quality of life, and evidence-based decision support to minimise these risks. Longer term plans for dashboard implementation and evaluation are also outlined. This mixed-method study will involve (1) co-designing dashboard features with aged care staff, clients, informal caregivers and general practitioners (GPs), (2) integrating aged care data silos and developing risk models, and (3) testing dashboard prototypes with users. The dashboard features will be informed by direct observations of routine work, interviews, focus groups and co-design groups with users, and a community forum. Multivariable discrete time survival models will be used to develop risk indicators, using predictors from linked historical aged care and hospital data. Dashboard prototype testing will comprise interviews, focus groups and walk-through scenarios using a think-aloud approach with staff members, clients and informal caregivers, and a GP workshop. This study has received ethical approval from the New South Wales (NSW) Population & Health Services Research Ethics Committee and Macquarie University's Human Research Ethics Committee. The research findings will be presented to the aged care provider who will share results with staff members, clients, residents and informal caregivers. Findings will be disseminated as peer-reviewed journal articles, policy briefs and conference presentations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34433599
pii: bmjopen-2021-048657
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048657
pmc: PMC8388274
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e048657Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15
pubmed: 18352969
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e028754
pubmed: 31753868
Qual Life Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):555-565
pubmed: 32989683
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Dec 1;30(10):810-816
pubmed: 29889231
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):114-9
pubmed: 17947626
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):198-208
pubmed: 27189013
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Dec;17(6):781-801
pubmed: 31512086
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Jul;71:211-221
pubmed: 28579532
N S W Public Health Bull. 2011 Jun;22(3-4):55-9
pubmed: 21632000
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Feb;122:63-69
pubmed: 30623785
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 May 31;5(2):e22
pubmed: 29853440
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Sep;72:59-66
pubmed: 28599139
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Aug;28(8):1245-62
pubmed: 27001706
Age Ageing. 2014 Sep;43(5):596-603
pubmed: 25092719
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 May 17;11:32
pubmed: 21586166
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Nov 1;30(9):684-691
pubmed: 29733364
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 18;20(1):883
pubmed: 32948168
JAMA. 2016 Feb 16;315(7):651-2
pubmed: 26881365
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Jun;15(3):399-412
pubmed: 27882528
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jul 1;187(7):1530-1538
pubmed: 29584812
Gerontologist. 2021 Apr 3;61(3):e61-e74
pubmed: 31773131
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Nov;73(11-12):781-95
pubmed: 15491929
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1805-1812
pubmed: 30395491
Aging Ment Health. 2015 Jan;19(1):13-31
pubmed: 24881888
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Feb;84(2):87-100
pubmed: 25453274
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 May 15;31(3):385-406
pubmed: 28686130
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2019 Oct-Dec;33(4):331-338
pubmed: 31343414
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 May;27(3):665-675
pubmed: 30421836
Popul Health Metr. 2020 Oct 8;18(1):25
pubmed: 33032628
BMJ. 2020 Apr 8;369:m958
pubmed: 32269037
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Nov;84(11):892-900
pubmed: 26250987
BMC Cancer. 2007 Feb 20;7:31
pubmed: 17311683
BMJ. 2020 Sep 17;370:m3216
pubmed: 32943437
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Nov;28(11):1480-1488
pubmed: 31389118
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 13;5(12):e15621
pubmed: 21179448
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Apr;78 Suppl 1:S25-33
pubmed: 18951838
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1775-1782
pubmed: 29706364