Learning new word meanings from story reading: the benefit of immediate testing.
Homonyms
Incidental learning
Intentional learning
Story reading
Testing effect
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
11
03
2021
accepted:
08
06
2021
entrez:
26
8
2021
pubmed:
27
8
2021
medline:
27
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study investigated how word meanings can be learned from natural story reading. Three experiments with adult participants compared naturalistic incidental learning with intentional learning of new meanings for familiar words, and examined the role of immediate tests in maintaining memory of new word meanings. In Experiment 1, participants learned new meanings for familiar words through incidental (story reading) and intentional (definition training task) conditions. Memory was tested with cued recall of meanings and multiple-choice meaning-to-word matching immediately and 24 h later. Results for both measures showed higher accuracy for intentional learning, which was also more time efficient than incidental learning. However, there was reasonably good learning from both methods, and items learned incidentally through stories appeared less susceptible to forgetting over 24 h. It was possible that retrieval practice at the immediate test may have aided learning and improved memory of new word meanings 24 h later, especially for the incidental story reading condition. Two preregistered experiments then examined the role of immediate testing in long-term retention of new meanings for familiar words. There was a strong testing effect for word meanings learned through intentional and incidental conditions (Experiment 2), which was non-significantly larger for items learned incidentally through stories. Both cued recall and multiple-choice tests were each individually sufficient to enhance retention compared to having no immediate test (Experiment 3), with a larger learning boost from multiple-choice. This research emphasises (i) the resilience of word meanings learned incidentally through stories and (ii) the key role that testing can play in boosting vocabulary learning from story reading.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34434641
doi: 10.7717/peerj.11693
pii: 11693
pmc: PMC8362668
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e11693Informations de copyright
© 2021 Hulme and Rodd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(4):252-7
pubmed: 19439397
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1432-63
pubmed: 25150680
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Mar;15(2):411-427
pubmed: 31961780
NPJ Sci Learn. 2017 Jan 27;2:3
pubmed: 30631450
Neuroimage. 2013 Sep;78:94-102
pubmed: 23578576
Med Educ. 2008 Oct;42(10):959-66
pubmed: 18823514
Science. 2008 Feb 15;319(5865):966-8
pubmed: 18276894
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):233-9
pubmed: 20053059
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1563-9
pubmed: 19857026
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;1(3):181-210
pubmed: 26151629
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Sep;46(9):1682-1700
pubmed: 32271064
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43426
pubmed: 22916259
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Sep;36(5):1118-33
pubmed: 20804289
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;15(1):20-7
pubmed: 20951630
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;61(10):1104-1115
pubmed: 32367542
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Apr;14(2):194-9
pubmed: 17694900
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249-55
pubmed: 16507066
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Sep;52(5):561-572
pubmed: 28032409
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jan;31(1):3-8
pubmed: 15641900
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):135-40
pubmed: 24838305
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:109-126
pubmed: 30227332
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jul;33(4):704-19
pubmed: 17576148
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Aug;21(8):573-576
pubmed: 28583416
Dev Sci. 2012 Sep;15(5):674-87
pubmed: 22925515
Brain Lang. 2017 Apr;167:13-27
pubmed: 27562102
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Apr;14(2):200-6
pubmed: 17694901
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 May;136(2):169-83
pubmed: 17500644
Dev Psychol. 2015 Mar;51(3):406-17
pubmed: 25642602
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(7):1130-1150
pubmed: 29283607
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011 Dec;17(4):382-95
pubmed: 22082095
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3181-96
pubmed: 21452941
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Oct;44(10):1533-1561
pubmed: 29389181
Mem Cognit. 2012 Oct;40(7):1095-108
pubmed: 22614728
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Jun;79:1-39
pubmed: 25898155
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):1001-25
pubmed: 23035665
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2017;32(5):637-649
pubmed: 29399593
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 27;364(1536):3773-800
pubmed: 19933145
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1155-9
pubmed: 16248758
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243512
pubmed: 33370334