Method for correction of experimental action spectrum using actual overlapping spectra of radiation sources.

Action spectra Basic wavelength Irradiation Photoresponse Spectra

Journal

MethodsX
ISSN: 2215-0161
Titre abrégé: MethodsX
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101639829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 21 08 2020
accepted: 04 01 2021
entrez: 26 8 2021
pubmed: 27 8 2021
medline: 27 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Experimental dependency of the photosystem's response on the wavelength of exciting radiation, also known as action spectrum, may be substantially affected by the spectrum shape of this radiation. This is especially important in the case, when different radiation sources are used for the investigation of action spectrum. For instance, too wide emission peaks of radiation sources can blur the scopes of actual action spectrum and distort information about the properties of photosystem at certain wavelength regions. Here, we propose a method for the correction of experimental action spectrum by the recalculation of experimental data of photoresponse according to actual spectra of exciting radiation. In the case of overlapping radiation spectra from different radiation sources, this method results in much better correlation of experimental action spectrum to actual action spectrum or absorption spectrum of photosystem. The data on photoactivity of several photocatalysts are presented to illustrate and validate the proposed method.•Activity of photosystem depends on the actual spectrum of the radiation source•Single-peak optical radiation sources with the same basic wavelength may cause a different photoactivity•Effect of actual spectrum of the light source on the photoactivity is to be considered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34434744
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101221
pii: S2215-0161(21)00013-3
pmc: PMC8374188
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101221

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The Authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

Références

Chem Soc Rev. 2017 Aug 14;46(16):4877-4894
pubmed: 28665437
Data Brief. 2018 Jul 05;19:2053-2060
pubmed: 30229081

Auteurs

Mikhail Lyulyukin (M)

Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk 630073, Russia.
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.

Nikita Kovalevskiy (N)

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.

Sofya Timofeeva (S)

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.

Egor Gusachenko (E)

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.

Maria Solovyeva (M)

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.

Dmitry Selishchev (D)

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.

Denis Kozlov (D)

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.

Classifications MeSH