Efficacy of Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab and Casirivimab/Imdevimab in Preventing Progression to Severe COVID-19 and Role of Variants of Concern.
Bamlanivimab/etesevimab
COVID-19
Casirivimab/imdevimab
Monoclonal antibodies
SARS-CoV-2
Variants of concern
Journal
Infectious diseases and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8229
Titre abrégé: Infect Dis Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101634499
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
06
07
2021
accepted:
10
08
2021
pubmed:
27
8
2021
medline:
27
8
2021
entrez:
26
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of hospitalization or death in patients infected by SARS-CoV2 variants of concern (VOCs) receiving combinations of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), bamlanivimab/etesevimab or casirivimab/imdevimab. Observational prospective study conducted in two Italian hospitals (University Hospital of Pisa and San Donato Hospital, Arezzo) including consecutive outpatients with COVID-19 who received bamlanivimab/etesevimab or casirivimab/imdevimab from March 20th to May 10th 2021. All patients were at high risk of COVID-19 progression according to FDA/AIFA recommendations. Patients were divided into two study groups according to the infecting viral strain (VOCs): Alpha and Gamma group. The primary endpoint was a composite of hospitalization or death within 30 days from mAbs infusion. A Cox regression multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the primary outcome in the overall population. The study included 165 patients: 105 were infected by the VOC Alpha and 43 by the VOC Gamma. In the Alpha group, no differences in the primary endpoint were observed between patients treated with bamlanivimab/etesevimab or casirivimab/imdevimab. Conversely, in the Gamma group, a higher proportion of patients treated with bamlanivimab/etesevimab met the primary endpoint compared to those receiving casirivimab/imdevimab (55% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.013). On multivariate Cox-regression analysis, the Gamma variant and days from symptoms onset to mAbs infusion were factors independently associated with higher risk of hospitalization or death, while casirivimab/imdevimab was protective (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.83, p = 0.019). In patients infected by the SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant, bamlanivimab/etesevimab should be used with caution because of the high risk of disease progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34435337
doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00525-4
pii: 10.1007/s40121-021-00525-4
pmc: PMC8386337
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2479-2488Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Diabetes Care. 2020 Oct;43(10):2345-2348
pubmed: 32788285
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):665-676
pubmed: 35151397
Cell. 2021 Apr 29;184(9):2384-2393.e12
pubmed: 33794143
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;7(12):ofaa563
pubmed: 33365358
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Mar 12;76(4):1078-1084
pubmed: 33374002
JAMA. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):632-644
pubmed: 33475701
bioRxiv. 2020 Oct 09;:
pubmed: 33024963
Cell Host Microbe. 2021 May 12;29(5):747-751.e4
pubmed: 33887205
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):389-395
pubmed: 33359375
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7871):276-280
pubmed: 34237773
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 21;384(3):238-251
pubmed: 33332778
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1):
pubmed: 33187978
Euro Surveill. 2021 Apr;26(16):
pubmed: 33890566
Cell. 2021 Jul 22;184(15):3949-3961.e11
pubmed: 34161776
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 May 19;6:121
pubmed: 34095513