Hardness of Resin Cements Polymerized through Glass-Ceramic Veneers.
glass ceramic
hardness
resin cement
veneers
Journal
Dentistry journal
ISSN: 2304-6767
Titre abrégé: Dent J (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101716125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Aug 2021
09 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
22
06
2021
revised:
26
07
2021
accepted:
02
08
2021
entrez:
26
8
2021
pubmed:
27
8
2021
medline:
27
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the hardness of resin cements polymerized through ceramic disks under different process factors (ceramic type and thickness, light-polymerization units and polymerization time); (2) Method: Three types of ceramic blocks were used (IPS e.max CAD; Celtra Duo; VITABLOCS). Ceramic disks measuring 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm were cut from commercial blocks. Two resin cements (Rely X Veneer and Variolink Esthetic) were polymerized through the ceramic specimens using distinct light-polymerization units (Deep-cure; Blue-phase) and time intervals (10 and 20 s). Hardness of cement specimens was measured using microhardness tester with a Knoop indenter. Data were statistically analyzed using factorial ANOVA (α = 5%); (3) Results: Mean microhardness of Rely X Veneer cement was significantly higher than that of Variolink Esthetic. Deep-cure resulted in higher mean microhardness values compared to Blue-phase at 0.5- and 1-mm specimen thicknesses. Moreover, a direct correlation was found between polymerization time and hardness of resin cement; (4) Conclusions: Surface hardness was affected by resin cement type and ceramic thickness, and not affected by ceramic types, within evaluated conditions. Increasing light-polymerization time significantly increased the hardness of the cement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34436004
pii: dj9080092
doi: 10.3390/dj9080092
pmc: PMC8394743
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
ID : 23571
Références
Dent Mater. 2016 May;32(5):676-86
pubmed: 27017156
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Oct;13(4):195-203
pubmed: 21217946
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4894653
pubmed: 28044129
J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Apr;65(4):512-8
pubmed: 2066888
J Orthod. 2016 Sep;43(3):193-201
pubmed: 27487476
Int J Dent. 2012;2012:317509
pubmed: 22548062
Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):389-96
pubmed: 17695870
Oper Dent. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2):203-10
pubmed: 20420064
Lasers Med Sci. 2015 May;30(4):1219-23
pubmed: 24740520
J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Nov;28(11):1022-8
pubmed: 11722718
Dent Mater. 2013 Dec;29(12):1251-5
pubmed: 24119919
Dent Mater. 2007 Nov;23(11):1363-8
pubmed: 17207526
Braz Dent J. 2018 Jan-Feb;29(1):76-81
pubmed: 29267529
J Prosthodont Res. 2014 Oct;58(4):208-16
pubmed: 25172234
Int J Oral Sci. 2018 Mar 2;10(1):5
pubmed: 29497061
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1183-1190
pubmed: 27352903
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 May;91(5):441-6
pubmed: 15153851
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Dec;32(6):625-35
pubmed: 23057051
Dent Mater. 1992 Sep;8(5):299-304
pubmed: 1303371
J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Apr;142 Suppl 2:20S-4S
pubmed: 21454837
Dent Mater. 2008 Aug;24(8):1141-7
pubmed: 18433858
Oper Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):153-62
pubmed: 25136906
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Nov;124(22):3762-7
pubmed: 22340238
Dent Mater. 2008 May;24(5):594-9
pubmed: 17669482
Braz Dent J. 2015 Oct;26(5):484-9
pubmed: 26647933
Braz Oral Res. 2013 Sep-Oct;27(5):403-9
pubmed: 24036978
Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):434-42
pubmed: 20859559
Acta Odontol Scand. 2008 Oct;66(5):257-61
pubmed: 18618339
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998 Jun;18(3):216-25
pubmed: 9728104
J Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;23(6):462-6
pubmed: 24597786
J Adhes Dent. 2014 Apr;16(2):129-35
pubmed: 24179989
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Apr;16(2):505-12
pubmed: 21350865
Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Jan-Feb;25(1):79-85
pubmed: 22259802