Human-Relevant Sensitivity of iPSC-Derived Human Motor Neurons to BoNT/A1 and B1.
Animal Testing Alternatives
Animals
Biological Assay
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
/ toxicity
Cell Differentiation
/ drug effects
Cells, Cultured
/ drug effects
Disease Models, Animal
Humans
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
/ drug effects
Mice
Motor Neurons
/ drug effects
Neuroblastoma
Tumor Cells, Cultured
/ drug effects
alternative methods
botulinum neurotoxins
in vitro potency determination
motor neurons
Journal
Toxins
ISSN: 2072-6651
Titre abrégé: Toxins (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101530765
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 08 2021
22 08 2021
Historique:
received:
31
07
2021
revised:
10
08
2021
accepted:
19
08
2021
entrez:
26
8
2021
pubmed:
27
8
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The application of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) for medical treatments necessitates a potency quantification of these lethal bacterial toxins, resulting in the use of a large number of test animals. Available alternative methods are limited in their relevance, as they are based on rodent cells or neuroblastoma cell lines or applicable for single toxin serotypes only. Here, human motor neurons (MNs), which are the physiological target of BoNTs, were generated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and compared to the neuroblastoma cell line SiMa, which is often used in cell-based assays for BoNT potency determination. In comparison with the mouse bioassay, human MNs exhibit a superior sensitivity to the BoNT serotypes A1 and B1 at levels that are reflective of human sensitivity. SiMa cells were able to detect BoNT/A1, but with much lower sensitivity than human MNs and appear unsuitable to detect any BoNT/B1 activity. The MNs used for these experiments were generated according to three differentiation protocols, which resulted in distinct sensitivity levels. Molecular parameters such as receptor protein concentration and electrical activity of the MNs were analyzed, but are not predictive for BoNT sensitivity. These results show that human MNs from several sources should be considered in BoNT testing and that human MNs are a physiologically relevant model, which could be used to optimize current BoNT potency testing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34437455
pii: toxins13080585
doi: 10.3390/toxins13080585
pmc: PMC8402508
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
EC 3.4.24.69
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 3;116(36):18098-18108
pubmed: 31431523
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Feb 23;8:73
pubmed: 28280466
J Cell Biol. 2003 Sep 29;162(7):1293-303
pubmed: 14504267
Adv Biol (Weinh). 2021 Mar;5(3):e2000223
pubmed: 33729694
Toxins (Basel). 2018 Sep 05;10(9):
pubmed: 30189643
Pharmacogenomics J. 2002;2(6):377-82
pubmed: 12629503
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2014 Mar;14(2):153-68
pubmed: 24450833
Toxicol Lett. 2016 Jan 22;241:193-9
pubmed: 26602169
Science. 2006 Apr 28;312(5773):592-6
pubmed: 16543415
Pharmacol Rev. 2017 Apr;69(2):200-235
pubmed: 28356439
Toxins (Basel). 2019 Dec 07;11(12):
pubmed: 31817843
J Cell Sci. 2012 Jul 1;125(Pt 13):3233-42
pubmed: 22454523
Toxins (Basel). 2016 May 17;8(5):
pubmed: 27196927
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2017;406:1-37
pubmed: 27921176
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 14;22(14):
pubmed: 34299143
FEBS Lett. 2012 Feb 17;586(4):310-3
pubmed: 22265973
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2013 Feb;39(1):43-56
pubmed: 22676403
Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:591-617
pubmed: 20233039
Toxins (Basel). 2019 Nov 22;11(12):
pubmed: 31771110
Toxicon. 2018 Jun 1;147:58-67
pubmed: 29031941
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1999 Jul 15;112(2):161-4
pubmed: 10686945
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Apr 25;12(5):
pubmed: 32344847
EMBO Rep. 2006 Oct;7(10):995-9
pubmed: 17016457
Nat Commun. 2015 Mar 25;6:6626
pubmed: 25806427
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 10;8(1):10416
pubmed: 29991696
J Neurosci. 2006 Dec 27;26(52):13493-504
pubmed: 17192432
Toxicol In Vitro. 2018 Dec;53:80-88
pubmed: 30016653
Neurotox Res. 2006 Apr;9(2-3):127-31
pubmed: 16785109
Toxicon. 2020 Apr 30;178:20-32
pubmed: 32094099
Toxins (Basel). 2018 May 10;10(5):
pubmed: 29748471
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Nov 09;8:796
pubmed: 29170639
Toxins (Basel). 2015 Nov 25;7(12):4895-905
pubmed: 26610569
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Jan;33(1):89-96
pubmed: 25383599
J Mol Biol. 2003 Feb 21;326(3):835-47
pubmed: 12581644
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):847e-855e
pubmed: 30489516
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Apr;82(4):838-845
pubmed: 31791824
Toxicol Sci. 2016 Feb;149(2):503-15
pubmed: 26615023
FEBS Lett. 2019 Sep;593(18):2675-2685
pubmed: 31240706
ALTEX. 2018 Oct 10;36(1):81-90
pubmed: 30303513
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 2;104(1):359-64
pubmed: 17185412
Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2020 Jul 1;28(4):302-310
pubmed: 32126735
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 14;11:617867
pubmed: 33519485
Toxicon. 2015 Dec 1;107(Pt A):77-84
pubmed: 26260691
Dermatol Surg. 2019 Nov;45(11):1381-1393
pubmed: 30893162
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Mar;6(3):231-42
pubmed: 12577062
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2007 Apr-Jun;33(2):109-25
pubmed: 17558660
Front Cell Neurosci. 2017 Sep 14;11:284
pubmed: 28959189
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Jun;130(6):1066-1073
pubmed: 30871800
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Dec 15;407:116516
pubmed: 31655410
ALTEX. 2015;32(4):297-306
pubmed: 26389683
Brain Res. 2011 Apr 18;1385:26-37
pubmed: 21354112
Science. 2007 Dec 21;318(5858):1917-20
pubmed: 18029452
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49516
pubmed: 23185348