The Bateman-Type Soft Tissue Reconstruction around Proximal or Total Humeral Megaprostheses in Patients with Primary Malignant Bone Tumors-Functional Outcome and Endoprosthetic Complications.
endoprosthetic complications
functional outcome
limb-salvage
megaprosthesis
primary malignant bone tumors
soft tissue
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Aug 2021
05 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
16
06
2021
revised:
23
07
2021
accepted:
03
08
2021
entrez:
27
8
2021
pubmed:
28
8
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to evaluate the functional outcome and endoprosthetic complications following the Bateman-type soft tissue reconstruction around proximal or total humeral replacements in patients undergoing resection of a primary malignant bone tumor. Between September 2001 and December 2018, a total of 102 patients underwent resection of a primary malignant bone tumor and subsequent reconstruction with a modular humeral megaprosthesis in our department. Fifteen (15%) of these patients underwent a Bateman-type soft tissue reconstruction and were included in this retrospective study. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 21, the median Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) was 70, and the median American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 72. Fifty-three percent (8/15) of all patients required a revision surgery after a median time of 6 months. There were 2 soft tissue failures, 3 infections and 3 tumor recurrences. The revision-free implant survivorship amounted to 53% (95% confidence interval (CI) 28-81) after 1 year and 47% (95% CI 22-73) at last follow-up. The Bateman-type reconstruction is a feasible option for soft tissue reconstruction but functional outcome is overall limited and the risk for revision surgery within the first postoperative year is high.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34439124
pii: cancers13163971
doi: 10.3390/cancers13163971
pmc: PMC8392651
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Jul;72(4):701-4
pubmed: 2380231
Int Orthop. 2003;27(3):160-3
pubmed: 12799759
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Mar 15;:
pubmed: 33721053
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2011 Feb;28(1):86-101
pubmed: 21675380
Int Orthop. 2013 Mar;37(3):451-6
pubmed: 23318938
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Jul;24(3):174-85
pubmed: 22752327
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Aug 1;479(8):1754-1764
pubmed: 33595237
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Jul;85(5):717-22
pubmed: 12892196
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 2;93(5):418-29
pubmed: 21368074
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Dec;(393):264-71
pubmed: 11764358
Springerplus. 2016 Jul 19;5(1):1118
pubmed: 27478735
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jul 2;4(7):445-459
pubmed: 31423328
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Jul;24(3):227-34
pubmed: 22743632
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Apr;46(4):736-744
pubmed: 21496546
Arch Surg. 1999 Mar;134(3):252-7
pubmed: 10088563
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jun;98-B(6):857-64
pubmed: 27235533
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 Jun 1;26(11):403-409
pubmed: 29762195
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1990;109(2):63-7
pubmed: 2317129
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Feb;(275):152-60
pubmed: 1735206
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jan;(286):241-6
pubmed: 8425352
Qual Life Res. 1996 Oct;5(5):508-16
pubmed: 8973131
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Dec;477(12):2705-2714
pubmed: 31764339
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 8;8(1):16148
pubmed: 30410099
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2009;179:75-84
pubmed: 19230536
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52
pubmed: 22958838
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Feb;105(1S):S153-S164
pubmed: 29958931
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Feb;125(1):62-5
pubmed: 15723248