Short-Term Bone Healing Response to Mechanical Stimulation-A Case Series Conducted on Sheep.
active fixation
bone mechanobiology
fracture healing
interfragmentary motions
tissue stiffness
Journal
Biomedicines
ISSN: 2227-9059
Titre abrégé: Biomedicines
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101691304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Aug 2021
10 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
06
07
2021
revised:
29
07
2021
accepted:
05
08
2021
entrez:
27
8
2021
pubmed:
28
8
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is well known that mechanical stimulation promotes indirect fracture healing by triggering callus formation. We investigated the short-term response of healing tissue to mechanical stimulation to compare the changes in tissue stiffness during stimulation and resting phases in a preclinical case-series. Four sheep underwent a tibial osteotomy and were instrumented with a custom-made active fixator which applied a mechanical stimulation protocol of 1000 cycles/day, equally distributed over 12 h, followed by 12 h of rest. During each cycle, a surrogate metric for tissue stiffness was measured, enabling a continuous real-time monitoring of the healing progression. A daily stiffness increase during stimulation and an increase during resting were evaluated for each animal. One animal had to be excluded from the evaluation due to technical reasons. For all included animals, the stiffness began to increase within the second week post-op. A characteristic pattern was observed during daily measurements: the stiffness dropped considerably within the first stimulation cycles followed by a steady rise throughout the rest of the stimulation phase. However, for all included animals, the average daily stiffness increase within the first three weeks post operation was larger during resting than during stimulation (Sheep I: 16.9% vs. -5.7%; Sheep II: 14.7% vs. -1.8%; Sheep III: 8.9% vs. 1.6%). A continuous measurement of tissue stiffness together with a controlled fracture stimulation enabled the investigation of the short-term effects of specific stimulatory parameters, such as resting periods. Resting was identified as a potentially determining factor for bone healing progression. Optimizing the ratio between stimulation and resting may contribute to more robust fracture healing in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34440192
pii: biomedicines9080988
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9080988
pmc: PMC8392136
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : AO Foundation AOTRAUMA Network
ID : AR2016_06
Références
Injury. 2007 Sep;38 Suppl 4:S3-6
pubmed: 18224731
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003 Oct;388(5):316-22
pubmed: 13680236
Bone. 2006 Jun;38(6):864-70
pubmed: 16359937
J Orthop Res. 2004 Jul;22(4):709-15
pubmed: 15183425
Injury. 2021 Jan;52(1):71-77
pubmed: 33131796
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Feb;443:307-14
pubmed: 16462456
Biomedicines. 2021 Jun 18;9(6):
pubmed: 34207370
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 22;21(1):
pubmed: 33375087
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 May;466(5):1232-8
pubmed: 18273676
J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Jan;15(1):54-60
pubmed: 11147689
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 11;12(12):e0189432
pubmed: 29228043
J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Mar;25(3):169-74
pubmed: 21321508
Front Physiol. 2017 Jan 24;7:678
pubmed: 28174539
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Oct;(355 Suppl):S132-47
pubmed: 9917634
Injury. 2021 Jun;52 Suppl 2:S78-S83
pubmed: 33041020
J Biomech. 2021 Aug 26;125:110576
pubmed: 34171609
Ann Biomed Eng. 2016 Aug;44(8):2489-2504
pubmed: 26786343
J Orthop Res. 2009 Jan;27(1):22-7
pubmed: 18634011
J Orthop Res. 2018 Jun;36(6):1790-1796
pubmed: 29159911
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Aug;67(4):650-5
pubmed: 4030869
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 29;6:22409
pubmed: 26926165
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(1):13-21
pubmed: 25748657
Chronobiol Int. 1984;1(2):121-6
pubmed: 6600017