Reducing Decision to Incision Time Interval for Emergency Cesarean Sections: 24 Months' Experience from Rural Sierra Leone.

Sierra Leone audit and feedback cesarean delivery decision to incision time interval quality of obstetric care

Journal

International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 08 2021
Historique:
received: 11 07 2021
revised: 30 07 2021
accepted: 04 08 2021
entrez: 27 8 2021
pubmed: 28 8 2021
medline: 3 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aimed at describing the changes in the completeness of documentation and changes in decision to incision time interval of emergency cesarean sections after an audit and feedback project a rural hospital in Sierra Leone. We documented and monitored the decision and incision times for emergency cesarean sections over the course of two years. Year one focused on the introduction of the project and year two focused on the continuous monitoring of the project. We compared the completeness of decision to incision data and used the 30-min benchmark as target for the decision to incision time interval. A total of 762 emergency cesarean sections were included. While the completion of decision time data (72%) did not change between the two reporting periods, documentation of incision time increased from 95% to 98% ( Although not all cesarean sections were performed within the 30-min threshold, the decision to incision interval decreased significantly. Improvements in documentation and routine reporting of the decision to incision time interval is recommended.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
This study aimed at describing the changes in the completeness of documentation and changes in decision to incision time interval of emergency cesarean sections after an audit and feedback project a rural hospital in Sierra Leone.
METHODS
We documented and monitored the decision and incision times for emergency cesarean sections over the course of two years. Year one focused on the introduction of the project and year two focused on the continuous monitoring of the project. We compared the completeness of decision to incision data and used the 30-min benchmark as target for the decision to incision time interval.
RESULTS
A total of 762 emergency cesarean sections were included. While the completion of decision time data (72%) did not change between the two reporting periods, documentation of incision time increased from 95% to 98% (
CONCLUSION
Although not all cesarean sections were performed within the 30-min threshold, the decision to incision interval decreased significantly. Improvements in documentation and routine reporting of the decision to incision time interval is recommended.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34444330
pii: ijerph18168581
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168581
pmc: PMC8392021
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):988-94
pubmed: 26629719
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):6-11
pubmed: 16816049
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 19;11(1):e0145771
pubmed: 26783742
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 4;4(5):e001605
pubmed: 31565407
BMJ. 2010 Jul 15;341:c3498
pubmed: 20634347
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;206(2):104-7
pubmed: 22000896
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;113(3):625-629
pubmed: 19300326
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Oct;115(1):106-11
pubmed: 21872239
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 15;18(1):164
pubmed: 29764384
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 12;17(1):184
pubmed: 28606111
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):343
pubmed: 27825311
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Aug;150(2):213-221
pubmed: 32306384
PLoS Curr. 2014 Dec 19;6:
pubmed: 25685617
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e129-e137
pubmed: 30620069
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Apr 12;14:139
pubmed: 24726010
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0150080
pubmed: 26910462
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259
pubmed: 22696318
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Oct;229:148-152
pubmed: 30195138

Auteurs

Lahai Tucker (L)

Partners In Health Sierra Leone, Koidu Town, Kono District, Sierra Leone.

Anna Frühauf (A)

Partners In Health Sierra Leone, Koidu Town, Kono District, Sierra Leone.

Isata Dumbuya (I)

Partners In Health Sierra Leone, Koidu Town, Kono District, Sierra Leone.

Paul Muwanguzi (P)

Partners In Health Sierra Leone, Koidu Town, Kono District, Sierra Leone.

Marta Lado (M)

Partners In Health Sierra Leone, Koidu Town, Kono District, Sierra Leone.

Daniel Lavallie (D)

Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Koidu Government Hospital, Koidu Town, Kono District, Sierra Leone.

Mohamed Sheku (M)

Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Makeni Regional Hospital, Makeni City, Bombali District, Sierra Leone.

Chiyembekezo Kachimanga (C)

Partners In Health Sierra Leone, Koidu Town, Kono District, Sierra Leone.
Partners in Health Malawi, Neno 313100, Malawi.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH