A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Minimally Invasive Microsurgical Versus Conventional Procedure for the Management of Localized Gingival Recession in Esthetic Zone using Alloderm.
Alloderm
microsurgery
patient satisfaction score
ultrasonograpy
Journal
Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences
ISSN: 0976-4879
Titre abrégé: J Pharm Bioallied Sci
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101537209
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
21
11
2020
revised:
22
11
2020
accepted:
23
11
2020
entrez:
27
8
2021
pubmed:
28
8
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Microsurgical technique is a recent advancement in periodontal plastic surgery, which improves the predictability of periodontal procedures, providing better esthetic results with minimal postoperative discomfort. Alloderm is an alternate to connective tissue grafts, which has been successfully used for root coverage. The present study aims at Comparative assessment of Micro and Conventional surgical techniques for root coverage using coronally positioned flap (CPF) with Alloderm. Twenty sites with Miller's Class I or II gingival recession defects were selected; sites were randomly divided into control and test groups. Test sites were treated with CPF and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) using Microsurgery and control sites were treated with CPF and ADM using conventional method. Conventional and Microsurgical procedures for root coverage showed a statistically significant difference in all clinical parameters from baseline to 3 and 6 months ( Microsurgical procedure for root coverage was found to be superior to the conventional macrosurgical approach under magnification. Microsurgical sites healed faster with neovascularization demonstrated on ultrasonographic evaluation with improved gingival thickness and patient satisfaction scores.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Microsurgical technique is a recent advancement in periodontal plastic surgery, which improves the predictability of periodontal procedures, providing better esthetic results with minimal postoperative discomfort. Alloderm is an alternate to connective tissue grafts, which has been successfully used for root coverage. The present study aims at Comparative assessment of Micro and Conventional surgical techniques for root coverage using coronally positioned flap (CPF) with Alloderm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Twenty sites with Miller's Class I or II gingival recession defects were selected; sites were randomly divided into control and test groups. Test sites were treated with CPF and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) using Microsurgery and control sites were treated with CPF and ADM using conventional method.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Conventional and Microsurgical procedures for root coverage showed a statistically significant difference in all clinical parameters from baseline to 3 and 6 months (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Microsurgical procedure for root coverage was found to be superior to the conventional macrosurgical approach under magnification. Microsurgical sites healed faster with neovascularization demonstrated on ultrasonographic evaluation with improved gingival thickness and patient satisfaction scores.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34447138
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_756_20
pii: JPBS-13-476
pmc: PMC8375812
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
S476-S483Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996 Mar;8(2):201-8
pubmed: 9028293
J Periodontol. 2007 Dec;78(12):2348-55
pubmed: 18052708
Dent Clin North Am. 1988 Apr;32(2):287-306
pubmed: 3288514
Clin Adv Periodontics. 2011 May;1(1):41-52
pubmed: 32698553
J Periodontol. 2010 Nov;81(11):1572-9
pubmed: 20583919
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 2000 Mar;12(2):171-80; quiz 182
pubmed: 11404959
J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Aug;23(8):770-7
pubmed: 8877664
J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Sep;23(9):839-45
pubmed: 8891935
Indian J Dent Res. 2005 Oct-Dec;16(4):135-9
pubmed: 16761705
J Periodontol. 2005 Feb;76(2):178-86
pubmed: 15974840
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):303-20
pubmed: 14971258
Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Jul-Sep;20(3):320-5
pubmed: 19884716
J Periodontol. 2001 Aug;72(8):998-1005
pubmed: 11525450