Examining the Effect of Gravity on Different Irrigation Systems: An
Apical extrusion of irrigation
endoactivator
final irrigation
manual needle irrigation
pressurized water
ultrasonic irrigation
Journal
Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences
ISSN: 0976-4879
Titre abrégé: J Pharm Bioallied Sci
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101537209
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
07
12
2020
revised:
01
01
2021
accepted:
08
01
2021
entrez:
27
8
2021
pubmed:
28
8
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Periapical extrusion is frequently observed during endodontic therapy. It can lead to acute injury of periapical tissues, resulting in interappointment pain or swelling. The effect is pronounced in teeth with immature apex, which are more susceptible to the extrusion of irrigant. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of gravity on the apical extrusion of irrigating solution with different irrigation protocols in single-rooted premolars. A total number of 80 permanent single-rooted teeth (premolars) with same working length (WL) were divided into two main groups: Group A: Penetration depth of irrigation syringe to 2 mm from the WL and Group B: Penetration depth of irrigation syringe to 4 mm from the WL. Each group was subdivided into four subgroups. ( Irrespective of the irrigation technique used, the amount of irrigant extruded from the apex showed a statistically significant difference related to the effect of gravity ( The degree of apical extrusion of irrigant was dependent on the type of irrigation technique and gravity. Greater caution should be taken during irrigation to prevent postoperative pain.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Periapical extrusion is frequently observed during endodontic therapy. It can lead to acute injury of periapical tissues, resulting in interappointment pain or swelling. The effect is pronounced in teeth with immature apex, which are more susceptible to the extrusion of irrigant. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of gravity on the apical extrusion of irrigating solution with different irrigation protocols in single-rooted premolars.
METHODOLOGY
METHODS
A total number of 80 permanent single-rooted teeth (premolars) with same working length (WL) were divided into two main groups: Group A: Penetration depth of irrigation syringe to 2 mm from the WL and Group B: Penetration depth of irrigation syringe to 4 mm from the WL. Each group was subdivided into four subgroups. (
RESULTS
RESULTS
Irrespective of the irrigation technique used, the amount of irrigant extruded from the apex showed a statistically significant difference related to the effect of gravity (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The degree of apical extrusion of irrigant was dependent on the type of irrigation technique and gravity. Greater caution should be taken during irrigation to prevent postoperative pain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34447183
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_813_20
pii: JPBS-13-692
pmc: PMC8375912
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
S692-S695Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Eur Endod J. 2020 May 14;5(2):150-154
pubmed: 32766527
J Endod. 2009 Jun;35(6):791-804
pubmed: 19482174
Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;54(2):313-24
pubmed: 20433980
Int Endod J. 2015 Apr;48(4):317-22
pubmed: 24861152
J Endod. 2011 Dec;37(12):1677-81
pubmed: 22099904
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Feb 11;14:12
pubmed: 24512441
J Endod. 2014 Jan;40(1):51-5
pubmed: 24331991
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971 Aug;32(2):271-5
pubmed: 5284110
J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Apr 01;7(2):e218-23
pubmed: 26155336
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Jul;11(4):433-9
pubmed: 25584055
J Endod. 2010 May;36(5):875-9
pubmed: 20416437
J Endod. 2010 Oct;36(10):1664-8
pubmed: 20850673
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Jul;17(4):374-8
pubmed: 25125853
J Endod. 2007 May;33(5):611-5
pubmed: 17437884
J Endod. 2013 May;39(5):719-22
pubmed: 23611399
Eur J Dent. 2008 Jul;2(3):198-203
pubmed: 19212547
Int Endod J. 2013 Jun;46(6):483-91
pubmed: 23216284