Gender-Related Impact of Sclerostin Antibody on Bone in the Osteogenesis Imperfecta Mouse.
gender
biomechanical strength
bone quality
fracture
oim/oim
osteogenesis imperfecta
sclerostin antibody
Journal
Frontiers in genetics
ISSN: 1664-8021
Titre abrégé: Front Genet
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560621
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
05
05
2021
accepted:
29
06
2021
entrez:
27
8
2021
pubmed:
28
8
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), which is most often due to a collagen type 1 gene mutation, is characterized by low bone density and bone fragility. In OI patients, gender-related differences were reported, but data in the literature are not convergent. We previously observed that sclerostin antibody (Scl-Ab), which stimulates osteoblast Wnt pathway via sclerostin inactivation, improved spine and long-bone parameters and biomechanical strength in female oim/oim mice, a validated model of human type 3 OI. Here, we wanted to highlight the effect of Scl-Ab on male oim/oim bones in order to identify a possible distinct therapeutic effect from that observed in females. According to the same protocol as our previous study with female mice, male wild-type (Wt) and oim/oim mice received vehicle or Scl-Ab from 5 to 14 weeks of age. Clinimetric and quantitative bone parameters were studied using X-rays, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, microradiography, and dynamic histomorphometry and compared to those of females. Contrary to Wt mice, male oim/oim had significantly lower weight, snout-sacrum length, and bone mineral content than females at 5 weeks. No significant difference in these clinimetric parameters was observed at 14 weeks, whereas male oim showed significantly more long-bone fractures than females. Scl-Ab improved bone mineral density and bone volume/total volume ratio (BV/TV) of vertebral body in Wt and oim/oim, without significant difference between male and female at 14 weeks. Male vehicle oim/oim had a significantly lower cortical thickness (Ct.Th) and BV/TV of tibial diaphysis than female and showed a higher number of fractures at 14 weeks. Scl-Ab increased midshaft periosteal apposition rate in such a way that tibial Ct.Th of male oim/oim was not significantly different from the female one at 14 weeks. The number of fractures was lower in male than female oim/oim after 14 weeks of Scl-Ab treatment, but this difference was not significant. Nevertheless, Scl-Ab-treated oim/oim male and female mice remained smaller than the Wt ones. In conclusion, our results highlighted differences between male and female oim/oim at 4 and 14 weeks of age, as well as some male-specific response of cortical bone to Scl-Ab. These gender-related particularities of oim/oim should be considered when testing experimental treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34447412
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.705505
pmc: PMC8383339
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
705505Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Cardinal, Chretien, Roels, Lafont, Ominsky, Devogelaer, Manicourt and Behets.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MO is a former employee of Radius Inc. and a former employee and stockholder of Amgen Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Aug;98(8):3095-103
pubmed: 23771926
Am J Med Genet A. 2012 May;158A(5):1046-54
pubmed: 22461456
Radiographics. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(7):2101-12
pubmed: 23150860
Metabolism. 2018 Mar;80:27-37
pubmed: 28625337
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Feb;96(2):355-64
pubmed: 21106710
Bone. 2019 Jul;124:137-147
pubmed: 31051315
J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Feb;30(2):216-24
pubmed: 25196993
Mol Syndromol. 2011 Dec;2(1):1-20
pubmed: 22570641
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):772-8
pubmed: 15129402
Bone. 2005 Jan;36(1):150-8
pubmed: 15664013
Lab Anim. 2010 Oct;44(4):329-36
pubmed: 20507878
Eur J Endocrinol. 2014 Aug;171(2):R79-90
pubmed: 24760541
Bone. 2017 Aug;101:96-103
pubmed: 28461254
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Mar;23(3):1141-50
pubmed: 21901481
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Oct;29(10):2297-306
pubmed: 24677211
Genet Med. 2019 May;21(5):1233-1239
pubmed: 30270360
Blood. 2011 Jan 20;117(3):1053-60
pubmed: 21088133
J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Jan;28(1):73-80
pubmed: 22836659
Acta Orthop. 2013 Aug;84(4):431-6
pubmed: 23992144
Bone. 2010 Feb;46(2):336-41
pubmed: 19833245
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Dec;25(12):2647-56
pubmed: 20641040
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1116:414-22
pubmed: 17646266
Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Jun;164A(6):1470-81
pubmed: 24715559
Matrix Biol. 2010 Sep;29(7):638-44
pubmed: 20619344
Bone. 2014 Sep;66:182-8
pubmed: 24953712
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 30;370(5):412-20
pubmed: 24382002
J Clin Pathol. 1996 Aug;49(8):627-30
pubmed: 8881910
Arch Osteoporos. 2011;6:31-8
pubmed: 22207876
Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Jun;41(6):1139-49
pubmed: 23536112
J Bone Miner Res. 1999 Feb;14(2):264-72
pubmed: 9933481
Calcif Tissue Int. 2020 May;106(5):494-508
pubmed: 32025752
Bone Rep. 2018 Jul 02;9:61-73
pubmed: 30105276
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10):1054-62
pubmed: 18828822
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Oct;33(10):1760-1772
pubmed: 29813187
N Engl J Med. 1984 Jun 28;310(26):1694-6
pubmed: 6727948
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2587-98
pubmed: 25903941
Bone. 2012 Jun;50(6):1317-23
pubmed: 22449447
Bone. 2011 Feb;48(2):197-201
pubmed: 20850580
Bone. 2003 Mar;32(3):268-74
pubmed: 12667554
J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Apr;24(4):578-88
pubmed: 19049336
Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Nov;80(5):1428-35
pubmed: 15531697
J Biomech. 2008 Dec 5;41(16):3371-6
pubmed: 19022450
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Aug;63(8):2385-95
pubmed: 21484764
Lancet. 2004 Apr 24;363(9418):1377-85
pubmed: 15110498
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Aug;25(8):2097-107
pubmed: 24803333