Computer-Mediated Communication in Adults With and Without Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Survey of Social Media Use.

cognitive communication disability rehabilitation social media traumatic brain injury

Journal

JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies
ISSN: 2369-2529
Titre abrégé: JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101703412

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 17 12 2020
accepted: 31 05 2021
revised: 03 03 2021
entrez: 27 8 2021
pubmed: 28 8 2021
medline: 28 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) report fewer social contacts, less social participation, and more social isolation than noninjured peers. Cognitive-communication disabilities may prevent individuals with TBI from accessing the opportunities for social connection afforded by computer-mediated communication, as individuals with TBI report lower overall usage of social media than noninjured peers and substantial challenges with accessibility and usability. Although adaptations for individuals with motor and sensory impairments exist to support social media use, there have been no parallel advances to support individuals with cognitive disabilities, such as those exhibited by some people with TBI. In this study, we take a preliminary step in the development process by learning more about patterns of social media use in individuals with TBI as well as their input and priorities for developing social media adaptations. This study aims to characterize how and why adults with TBI use social media and computer-mediated communication platforms, to evaluate changes in computer-mediated communication after brain injury, and to elicit suggestions from individuals with TBI to improve access to social media after injury. We conducted a web-based survey of 53 individuals with a chronic history of moderate-to-severe TBI and a demographically matched group of 51 noninjured comparison peers. More than 90% of participants in both groups had an account on at least one computer-mediated communication platform, with Facebook and Facebook Messenger being the most popular platforms in both groups. Participants with and without a history of TBI reported that they use Facebook more passively than actively and reported that they most frequently maintain web-based relationships with close friends and family members. However, participants with TBI reported less frequently than noninjured comparison participants that they use synchronous videoconferencing platforms, are connected with acquaintances on the web, or use social media as a gateway for offline social connection (eg, to find events). Of the participants with TBI, 23% (12/53) reported a change in their patterns of social media use caused by brain injury and listed concerns about accessibility, safety, and usability as major barriers. Although individuals with TBI maintain social media accounts to the same extent as healthy comparisons, some may not use them in a way that promotes social connection. Thus, it is important to design social media adaptations that address the needs and priorities of individuals with TBI, so they can also reap the benefits of social connectedness offered by these platforms. By considering computer-mediated communication as part of individuals' broader social health, we may be able to increase web-based participation in a way that is meaningful, positive, and beneficial to broader social life.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) report fewer social contacts, less social participation, and more social isolation than noninjured peers. Cognitive-communication disabilities may prevent individuals with TBI from accessing the opportunities for social connection afforded by computer-mediated communication, as individuals with TBI report lower overall usage of social media than noninjured peers and substantial challenges with accessibility and usability. Although adaptations for individuals with motor and sensory impairments exist to support social media use, there have been no parallel advances to support individuals with cognitive disabilities, such as those exhibited by some people with TBI. In this study, we take a preliminary step in the development process by learning more about patterns of social media use in individuals with TBI as well as their input and priorities for developing social media adaptations.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to characterize how and why adults with TBI use social media and computer-mediated communication platforms, to evaluate changes in computer-mediated communication after brain injury, and to elicit suggestions from individuals with TBI to improve access to social media after injury.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a web-based survey of 53 individuals with a chronic history of moderate-to-severe TBI and a demographically matched group of 51 noninjured comparison peers.
RESULTS RESULTS
More than 90% of participants in both groups had an account on at least one computer-mediated communication platform, with Facebook and Facebook Messenger being the most popular platforms in both groups. Participants with and without a history of TBI reported that they use Facebook more passively than actively and reported that they most frequently maintain web-based relationships with close friends and family members. However, participants with TBI reported less frequently than noninjured comparison participants that they use synchronous videoconferencing platforms, are connected with acquaintances on the web, or use social media as a gateway for offline social connection (eg, to find events). Of the participants with TBI, 23% (12/53) reported a change in their patterns of social media use caused by brain injury and listed concerns about accessibility, safety, and usability as major barriers.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although individuals with TBI maintain social media accounts to the same extent as healthy comparisons, some may not use them in a way that promotes social connection. Thus, it is important to design social media adaptations that address the needs and priorities of individuals with TBI, so they can also reap the benefits of social connectedness offered by these platforms. By considering computer-mediated communication as part of individuals' broader social health, we may be able to increase web-based participation in a way that is meaningful, positive, and beneficial to broader social life.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34448727
pii: v8i3e26586
doi: 10.2196/26586
pmc: PMC8433938
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e26586

Subventions

Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : P50 HD103537
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD071089
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Emily L Morrow, Fangyun Zhao, Lyn Turkstra, Catalina Toma, Bilge Mutlu, Melissa C Duff. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 27.08.2021.

Références

J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Brain Inj. 2011;25(12):1155-62
pubmed: 21961574
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Mar;2(2):85-95
pubmed: 19263543
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):E9-E17
pubmed: 28422898
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Dec;48(6):1429-41
pubmed: 16478381
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(17):1409-18
pubmed: 24059448
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Sep;24(9):1417-24
pubmed: 17892404
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):744-755
pubmed: 33326363
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jun;102(6):1075-1083
pubmed: 33529614
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Nov;97(11):1821-1831
pubmed: 27246623
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Mar;54(2):221-233
pubmed: 29873159
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Sep;91(9):1436-41
pubmed: 20801264
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001 Oct;16(5):469-83
pubmed: 11574042
NeuroRehabilitation. 2004;19(3):245-56
pubmed: 15502257
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Dec;19(12):771-782
pubmed: 26578288
Brain Inj. 2018;32(13-14):1720-1724
pubmed: 30325251
Crit Care. 2016 Jun 21;20(1):148
pubmed: 27323708
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):254-261
pubmed: 32108716
Neuropsychology. 2011 May;25(3):277-285
pubmed: 21463043
Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;48(2):369-80
pubmed: 22288367
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 16;11(1):5803
pubmed: 33199695
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jan;94(1 Suppl):S30-42
pubmed: 23260776
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(17):1511-21
pubmed: 25985717
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019 Jun;29(5):789-803
pubmed: 28594270

Auteurs

Emily L Morrow (EL)

Department of Hearing & Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

Fangyun Zhao (F)

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Department of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Lyn Turkstra (L)

Speech-Language Pathology Program, School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Catalina Toma (C)

Department of Communication Arts, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Bilge Mutlu (B)

Department of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Melissa C Duff (MC)

Department of Hearing & Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

Classifications MeSH