Effectiveness of Aural-Oral Approach Based on Volubility of a Deaf Child with Late-Mapping Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
aural approach
cochlear implant
protophones
speech analysis
volubility
Journal
Audiology research
ISSN: 2039-4330
Titre abrégé: Audiol Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101644681
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Aug 2021
05 Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
05
07
2021
revised:
20
07
2021
accepted:
04
08
2021
entrez:
27
8
2021
pubmed:
28
8
2021
medline:
28
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of aural-oral habilitation (AO) over the traditional speech-language therapy, based on the number of vocalization-volubility of a deaf child with late-mapping bilateral cochlear implants using sequential measurements. The spontaneous productions during child interactions were analyzed. The child (CY, 7;0 years old) with a mean unaided pure-tone average (PTA) hearing loss >80 dB HL was assessed by using an assessment battery. Study design consisted of two phases: (a) baseline (end of speech therapy) and (b) end of AO treatment. Protophones were analyzed via acoustical analysis using PRAAT software. One-way repeated-measure ANOVAs were conducted within and between phases. The analyses revealed significant differences between the 'phase' and the vocalization outcome (F = 9.4, df = 1, AO approach proved effective as measured through volubility. The outcome of this study is indicative and is a starting point for broader research.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of aural-oral habilitation (AO) over the traditional speech-language therapy, based on the number of vocalization-volubility of a deaf child with late-mapping bilateral cochlear implants using sequential measurements.
METHODS
METHODS
The spontaneous productions during child interactions were analyzed. The child (CY, 7;0 years old) with a mean unaided pure-tone average (PTA) hearing loss >80 dB HL was assessed by using an assessment battery. Study design consisted of two phases: (a) baseline (end of speech therapy) and (b) end of AO treatment. Protophones were analyzed via acoustical analysis using PRAAT software.
RESULTS
RESULTS
One-way repeated-measure ANOVAs were conducted within and between phases. The analyses revealed significant differences between the 'phase' and the vocalization outcome (F = 9.4, df = 1,
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
AO approach proved effective as measured through volubility. The outcome of this study is indicative and is a starting point for broader research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34449563
pii: audiolres11030035
doi: 10.3390/audiolres11030035
pmc: PMC8395430
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
373-383Références
Pediatrics. 2017 Jul;140(1):
pubmed: 28759398
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 May;61(3):164-179
pubmed: 29253607
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2332-43
pubmed: 25260109
Volta Rev. 1999;101(3):111-164
pubmed: 21666760
Ear Hear. 2002 Dec;23(6):532-9
pubmed: 12476090
Psychol Sci. 2008 May;19(5):515-23
pubmed: 18466414
Neuroreport. 2005 Dec 19;16(18):2041-5
pubmed: 16317351
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 16;110(16):6318-23
pubmed: 23550164
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1):
pubmed: 26684476
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1064-1076
pubmed: 32053545
Ear Hear. 2011 Feb;32(1 Suppl):39S-48S
pubmed: 21832889
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Feb;44(1):192-206
pubmed: 11218103
Ear Hear. 2011 Feb;32(1 Suppl):84S-92S
pubmed: 21832892
J Commun Disord. 1999 Jul-Aug;32(4):223-45
pubmed: 10466095
J Commun Disord. 2009 Jul-Aug;42(4):272-9
pubmed: 19380150
J Commun Disord. 2006 Jul-Aug;39(4):266-91
pubmed: 16635494
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2000 Dec;185:77-9
pubmed: 11141015
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2000 Dec;185:123-5
pubmed: 11140985
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Feb 26;63(2):393-404
pubmed: 32073331
Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1 Suppl):46S-58S
pubmed: 12612480
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Apr;34(3):451-9
pubmed: 23442569
Audiol Neurootol. 2001 Nov-Dec;6(6):363-80
pubmed: 11847464
Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1 Suppl):121S-5S
pubmed: 12612486
Volta Rev. 2008 Sep;108(2):115-138
pubmed: 21499444
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Jul-Aug;49(4):416-51
pubmed: 25142091