Patient-reported experience with discussion of all options during pregnancy options counseling in the US South.

To estimate the association between discussion of all options (adoption, abortion, and parenting) in pregnancy options counseling and patient-reported experience with counseling. Patients (n = 316) who received a positive pregnancy test Oct 2018-June 2019 at one of 14 randomly selected clinics in a southern US publicly funded family planning system participated in an anonymous digital survey about their experience with counseling. The survey assessed which options (parenting, adoption, abortion) they discussed with their provider and how they rated their counseling experience using a 20-item scale based on validated measures of patient reproductive health counseling experience. We used Poisson regression to estimate the prevalence ratio for discussing all pregnancy options and rating their provider with a perfect score. Approximately 10% of patients reported their provider discussed all options. After adjustment for patient, provider, and clinic characteristics, patients were approximately 80% more likely to rate their counseling as "excellent" on all analyzed scale items when their provider discussed all options compared to when they did not (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.43, 2.28). Discussion of all pregnancy options was associated with a more positive patient-reported experience among patients who planned to continue their pregnancy (aPR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.37, 2.42) and among those who did not (aPR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.44). Patients whose provider had received options counseling training were more likely to report all options were discussed. Discussion of all options during pregnancy counseling is associated with a more positive patient experience. These findings indicate patient preference for supportive, nondirective counseling on all pregnancy options. Our study's findings support nondirective discussion of all pregnancy options (including parenting, abortion and adoption) as a best practice, and stand in contrast to regulations that restrict discussion of all options.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.