Sex Disparities in Efficacy in COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
gender
immune system
sex
vaccines
Journal
Vaccines
ISSN: 2076-393X
Titre abrégé: Vaccines (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101629355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jul 2021
27 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
28
05
2021
revised:
19
07
2021
accepted:
22
07
2021
entrez:
28
8
2021
pubmed:
29
8
2021
medline:
29
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sex differences in adaptive and innate immune responses have been shown to occur and anecdotal reports suggest that vaccine efficacy and safety may be sex-dependent. We investigated the influence of sex on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines through a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines. The safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines was also investigated. A systematic review included eligible articles published in three databases and three websites. A meta-analysis of available data, stratified by sex, was conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method, as well as influence and heterogeneity analysis. Pooled analysis showed significantly higher efficacy, measured as the rate of new COVID-19 cases, in men compared to women in the vaccine group (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.94). No sex differences were found in the rate of new cases in the control group (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.09). Safety profiles derived from pharmacovigilance reports appear to indicate increased toxicity in women. In conclusion, evidence of a potential role of sex in COVID-19 vaccine efficacy was described. It strengthens the need to include sex as a core variable in the clinical trial design of COVID-19 vaccines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34451950
pii: vaccines9080825
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9080825
pmc: PMC8402482
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Physiology (Bethesda). 2015 Nov;30(6):408-16
pubmed: 26525340
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Nov 14;15:99
pubmed: 26573817
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;59(6):812-820
pubmed: 33218394
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):966-967
pubmed: 33684351
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 9;11(1):6317
pubmed: 33298944
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Jul;20(7):442-447
pubmed: 32528136
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 3;384(22):2092-2101
pubmed: 33835769
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Oct 25;17:100188
pubmed: 31891132
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 17;350(25):2558-63
pubmed: 15201412
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2187-2201
pubmed: 33882225
Drug Saf. 2020 Dec;43(12):1309-1314
pubmed: 32978702
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Mar;137(3):868-78
pubmed: 26452420
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Jan;109(1):9-15
pubmed: 25573105
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 May;109(5):1169-1172
pubmed: 33870489
Lancet. 2021 Feb 20;397(10275):671-681
pubmed: 33545094
Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):565-582
pubmed: 32828189
Lancet. 2006 Jul 29;368(9533):371-8
pubmed: 16876665
Nat Rev Immunol. 2016 Oct;16(10):626-38
pubmed: 27546235
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Oct 6;33:577-599
pubmed: 28992436
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2020 Sep;49(5):405-408
pubmed: 32800743
JAMA. 2021 Jun 22;325(24):2448-2456
pubmed: 33929487