Efficacy of Unsupervised Self-Collected Mid-Turbinate FLOQSwabs for the Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
SARS-CoV-2
dry swab
surveillance
unsupervised self-collection
Journal
Viruses
ISSN: 1999-4915
Titre abrégé: Viruses
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101509722
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 08 2021
22 08 2021
Historique:
received:
21
05
2021
revised:
02
08
2021
accepted:
17
08
2021
entrez:
28
8
2021
pubmed:
29
8
2021
medline:
14
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Global Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has resulted in explosive patterns of transmission in most countries. Nasopharyngeal swabs were the specimen's collection tools recommended for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and for monitoring infection outbreaks in communities. Our objective was to report the quality and efficacy of unsupervised self-collected mid turbinate "dry FLOQSwabs" (MT FLOQSwabs) (56380CS01, Copan). There were 111 specimens collected for the study: 36 by health care personnel, from themselves, to verify the quality and efficacy of mid-turbinate swabs; 75 to compare and assess the diagnostic performance, among health care personnel, of nasopharyngeal swabs and self-collected mid-turbinate FLOQSwabs. A collection of 51 specimens was enrolled to define the efficacy of the Testami program (validation). Our analyses demonstrate that self-collected mid-turbinate dry swabs ensure an accuracy of 97.3%, as compared to the standard nasopharyngeal swabs collected by health care workers. Furthermore, the mid-turbinate FLOQSwabs can be stored without medium for six days at room temperature without affecting the molecular diagnosis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. Self-collection of diagnostic specimens at home could offer an avenue to increase testing availability for SARS-CoV-2 infection without asking people to travel to a clinic or a laboratory, thus reducing people's exposure to infection. Our findings demonstrate that unsupervised self-collection swabs, transported dry, are sensitive, practical and easy-to-use tools and should be considered for diagnosis of SARS-COV-2 and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) surveillance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34452527
pii: v13081663
doi: 10.3390/v13081663
pmc: PMC8402664
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3742-3
pubmed: 20702665
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Sep;48(9):3340-2
pubmed: 20610685
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Jun 20;13:281
pubmed: 23786598
Virol J. 2010 Apr 30;7:85
pubmed: 20433729
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Apr;5(4):536-544
pubmed: 32123347
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21335
pubmed: 21731708
J Virol Methods. 2008 Nov;153(2):84-9
pubmed: 18761378
J Clin Virol. 2018 Oct;107:6-10
pubmed: 30103163
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jun;87(6):548-54
pubmed: 22551906
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104449
pubmed: 32504943