Addition of intracranial aspiration to balloon guide catheter does not improve outcomes in large vessel occlusion anterior circulation stent retriever based thrombectomy for acute stroke.


Journal

Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 07 05 2021
accepted: 08 08 2021
pubmed: 29 8 2021
medline: 17 8 2022
entrez: 28 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Balloon guide catheter (BGC) in stent retriever based thrombectomy (BGC+SR) for patients with large vessel occlusion strokes (LVOS) improves outcomes. It is conceivable that the addition of a large bore distal access catheter (DAC) to BGC+SR leads to higher efficacy. We aimed to investigate whether the combined BGC+DAC+SR approach improves angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with BGC+SR alone for thrombectomy in anterior circulation LVOS. Consecutive patients with anterior circulation LVOS from June 2019 to November 2020 were recruited from the ROSSETTI registry. Demographic, clinical, angiographic, and outcome data were compared between patients treated with BGC+SR alone versus BGC+DAC+SR. The primary outcome was first pass effect (FPE) rate, defined as near complete/complete revascularization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2c-3) after single device pass. We included 401 patients (BGC+SR alone, 273 (66.6%) patients). Patients treated with BGC+SR alone were older (median age 79 (IQR 68-85) vs 73.5 (65-82) years; p=0.033) and had shorter procedural times (puncture to revascularization 24 (14-46) vs 37 (24.5-63.5) min, p<0.001) than the BGC+DAC+SR group. Both approaches had a similar FPE rate (52% in BGC+SR alone vs 46.9% in BGC+DAC+SR, p=0.337). Although the BGC+SR alone group showed higher rates for final successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b (86.8% vs 74.2%, p=0.002) and excellent reperfusion, mTICI ≥2 c (76.2% vs 55.5%, p<0.001)), there were no significant differences in 24 hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score or rates of good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 3 months across these techniques. Our data showed that addition of distal intracranial aspiration catheters to BGC+SR based thrombectomy in patients with acute anterior circulation LVO did not provide higher rates of FPE or improved clinical outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Balloon guide catheter (BGC) in stent retriever based thrombectomy (BGC+SR) for patients with large vessel occlusion strokes (LVOS) improves outcomes. It is conceivable that the addition of a large bore distal access catheter (DAC) to BGC+SR leads to higher efficacy. We aimed to investigate whether the combined BGC+DAC+SR approach improves angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with BGC+SR alone for thrombectomy in anterior circulation LVOS.
METHODS METHODS
Consecutive patients with anterior circulation LVOS from June 2019 to November 2020 were recruited from the ROSSETTI registry. Demographic, clinical, angiographic, and outcome data were compared between patients treated with BGC+SR alone versus BGC+DAC+SR. The primary outcome was first pass effect (FPE) rate, defined as near complete/complete revascularization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2c-3) after single device pass.
RESULTS RESULTS
We included 401 patients (BGC+SR alone, 273 (66.6%) patients). Patients treated with BGC+SR alone were older (median age 79 (IQR 68-85) vs 73.5 (65-82) years; p=0.033) and had shorter procedural times (puncture to revascularization 24 (14-46) vs 37 (24.5-63.5) min, p<0.001) than the BGC+DAC+SR group. Both approaches had a similar FPE rate (52% in BGC+SR alone vs 46.9% in BGC+DAC+SR, p=0.337). Although the BGC+SR alone group showed higher rates for final successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b (86.8% vs 74.2%, p=0.002) and excellent reperfusion, mTICI ≥2 c (76.2% vs 55.5%, p<0.001)), there were no significant differences in 24 hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score or rates of good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 3 months across these techniques.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our data showed that addition of distal intracranial aspiration catheters to BGC+SR based thrombectomy in patients with acute anterior circulation LVO did not provide higher rates of FPE or improved clinical outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34452989
pii: neurintsurg-2021-017760
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017760
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

863-867

Investigateurs

E González Díaz (E)
Labayen Azparren (L)
E González Díaz (E)
Labayen Azparren (L)
J Fondevila Monsó (J)
Manso Del Caño (MD)
P Vega (P)
E Murias (E)
J M Jiménez Pérez (JM)
J Chaviano Grajera (J)
M Castañon Apilanez (M)
E Lopez Cancio (E)
R Oteros Fernández (R)
E Jiménez-Gómez (E)
Bravo Rey (B)
Romero Saucedo (R)
F Delgado Acosta (F)
L San Román (L)
A López-Rueda (A)
J Macho (J)
N Macías (N)
F Zarco (F)
A Renú Jornet (A)
J Blasco (J)
M Moreu (M)
C Perez-García (C)
S Rosati (S)
A López-Frias (A)
O Chirife Chaparro (O)
S Aixut (S)
Rodríguez Caamaño (R)
de Miquel Miquel Ma (M)
R Barranco Pons (R)
L Aja Rodríguez (L)
Cuba Camasca (C)
M Terceño (M)
S Bashir (S)
L Paul (L)
M Werner (M)
C Castaño (C)
S Remollo (S)
J M Pumar (JM)
A Mosqueira (A)
Y Aguilar Tejedor (Y)
D Cubillo Prieto (D)
Bravo de Laguna Toboada A (BL)
J C Méndez (JC)
I Bermúdez-Coronel (I)
E Fandiño (E)
J I Gallego Leon (JI)
N López Hernandez (N)
S Moliner (S)
J C Rayon (JC)

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: RGN reports consulting fees for advisory roles with Anaconda, Biogen, Cerenovus, Genentech, Imperative Care, Medtronic, Phenox, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, and Stryker Neurovascular, and stock options for advisory roles with Astrocyte, Brainomix, Cerebrotech, Ceretrieve, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Vesalio, Viz-AI, and Perfuze.

Auteurs

Jordi Blasco (J)

Neurointerventional Department CDI, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 30018jba@gmail.com.

Josep Puig (J)

IDI-Radiology, Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital of Girona, Girona, Spain.

Antonio López-Rueda (A)

Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Clinic University Hospital, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Pepus Daunis-I-Estadella (P)

Department of Computer Science, Applied Mathematics and Statistics, University of Girona, Girona, Catalunya, Spain.

Laura Llull (L)

Neurology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

Federico Zarco (F)

Comprehensive Stroke Unit, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Napoleon Macias (N)

Comprehensive Stroke Unit, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Juan Macho (J)

Neurointerventional Department CDI, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Eva González (E)

Interventional Neuroradiology, Radiology, Hospital Cruces, Bilbao, Spain.

Ion Labayen (I)

Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, País Vasco, Spain.

Pedro Vega (P)

Radiology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.

Eduardo Murias (E)

Radiology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.

Elvira Jimenez-Gomez (E)

Diagnostic and Therapeutical Neuroradiology Unit, Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.

Isabel Bravo Rey (I)

Neurorradiologia, Hospital universitario Reina Sofia, Córdoba, Spain.

Manuel Moreu (M)

Neurointerventional Unit, Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Carlos Pérez-García (C)

Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Oscar Chirife Chaparro (O)

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

Sonia Aixut (S)

Neuroradiology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain.

Mikel Terceño (M)

Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.

Mariano Werner (M)

Department of Radiology, Hospital Clinic I Provincial de Barcelona, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.

José Manuel Pumar (JM)

Neuroradiology, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Yeray Aguilar Tejedor (Y)

Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canarias, Spain.

Jose Carlos Mendez (JC)

Interventional Neuroradiology Unit, Radiology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

Sarai Moliner (S)

Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Valenciana, Spain.

Raul G Nogueira (RG)

Neurology and Interventional Neuroradiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Luis San Roman (L)

Neurointerventional Department CDI, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH