The Value of Preoperative Plasma VEGF Levels in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Treated with Radical Cystectomy.


Journal

European urology focus
ISSN: 2405-4569
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Focus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101665661

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2022
Historique:
received: 04 06 2021
revised: 15 07 2021
accepted: 12 08 2021
pubmed: 30 8 2021
medline: 12 10 2022
entrez: 29 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Elevated preoperative plasma levels of the angiogenesis-related marker VEGF have been associated with worse oncological outcomes in various malignancies. To investigate the predictive/prognostic role of VEGF in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) treated with radical cystectomy (RC). VEGF plasma levels were measured preoperatively in 1036 patients with UCB who underwent RC. The correlation between plasma VEGF levels and pathological and survival outcomes was assessed using logistic regression and Cox regression analyses. Discrimination was assessed using the concordance index (C index). The clinical net benefit was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). Patients with higher pretreatment plasma VEGF levels had poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) according to log-rank tests (all p < 0.001). Higher VEGF levels were not independently associated with higher risk of lymph node metastasis, ≥pT3 disease, or non-organ-confined disease (all p > 0.05). Preoperative plasma VEGF levels were independently associated with RFS, CSS, and OS in preoperative and postoperative multivariable models. However, in all cases the C index increased by <0.02 and there was no improvement in net benefit on DCA. A limitation is that none of the patients received current elements of standard of care such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Elevated plasma VEGF levels were associated with features of biologically and clinically aggressive disease such as worse survival outcomes among patients with UCB treated with RC. However, VEGF appears to have relatively limited incremental additive value in clinical use. Further study of VEGF for UCB prognostication is warranted before routine use in clinical algorithms. Currently available models for predicting outcomes in bladder cancer are less than optimal. A protein called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is a marker of the formation of blood vessels (angiogenesis), may have a role in predicting survival outcomes in bladder cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Elevated preoperative plasma levels of the angiogenesis-related marker VEGF have been associated with worse oncological outcomes in various malignancies.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the predictive/prognostic role of VEGF in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) treated with radical cystectomy (RC).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
VEGF plasma levels were measured preoperatively in 1036 patients with UCB who underwent RC.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The correlation between plasma VEGF levels and pathological and survival outcomes was assessed using logistic regression and Cox regression analyses. Discrimination was assessed using the concordance index (C index). The clinical net benefit was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA).
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
Patients with higher pretreatment plasma VEGF levels had poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) according to log-rank tests (all p < 0.001). Higher VEGF levels were not independently associated with higher risk of lymph node metastasis, ≥pT3 disease, or non-organ-confined disease (all p > 0.05). Preoperative plasma VEGF levels were independently associated with RFS, CSS, and OS in preoperative and postoperative multivariable models. However, in all cases the C index increased by <0.02 and there was no improvement in net benefit on DCA. A limitation is that none of the patients received current elements of standard of care such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Elevated plasma VEGF levels were associated with features of biologically and clinically aggressive disease such as worse survival outcomes among patients with UCB treated with RC. However, VEGF appears to have relatively limited incremental additive value in clinical use. Further study of VEGF for UCB prognostication is warranted before routine use in clinical algorithms.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Currently available models for predicting outcomes in bladder cancer are less than optimal. A protein called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is a marker of the formation of blood vessels (angiogenesis), may have a role in predicting survival outcomes in bladder cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34454852
pii: S2405-4569(21)00221-2
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.006
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

972-979

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Keiichiro Mori (K)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Victor M Schuettfort (VM)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Satoshi Katayama (S)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.

Ekaterina Laukhtina (E)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.

Benjamin Pradere (B)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Fahad Quhal (F)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Reza Sari Motlagh (R)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Hadi Mostafaei (H)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Nico C Grossmann (NC)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Pawel Rajwa (P)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.

Frederik König (F)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Abdulmajeed Aydh (A)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Francesco Soria (F)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy.

Marco Moschini (M)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Pierre I Karakiewicz (PI)

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Yair Lotan (Y)

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.

Douglas Scherr (D)

Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

Martin Haydter (M)

Department of Urology, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Vienna, Austria.

Peter Nyirady (P)

Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Jeremy Y C Teoh (JYC)

Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Shin Egawa (S)

Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Eva Compérat (E)

Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Shahrokh F Shariat (SF)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH