Latent Congruence Model to Investigate Similarity and Accuracy in Family Members' Perception: The Challenge of Cross-National and Cross-Informant Measurement (Non)Invariance.
accuracy
cross-informant
cross-national
latent congruence model
measurement invariance
parent-child relationship
similarity
support exchanges
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
25
02
2021
accepted:
29
06
2021
entrez:
30
8
2021
pubmed:
31
8
2021
medline:
31
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Several methods are available to answer questions regarding similarity and accuracy, each of which has specific properties and limitations. This study focuses on the Latent Congruence Model (LCM; Cheung, 2009), because of its capacity to deal with cross-informant measurement invariance issues. Until now, no cross-national applications of LCM are present in the literature, perhaps because of the difficulty to deal with both cross-national and cross-informant measurement issues implied by those models. This study presents a step-by-step procedure to apply LCM to dyadic cross-national research designs controlling for both cross-national and cross-informant measurement invariance. An illustrative example on parent-child support exchanges in Italy and Germany is provided. Findings help to show the different possible scenarios of partial invariance, and a discussion related to how to deal with those scenarios is provided. Future perspectives in the study of parent-child similarity and accuracy in cross-national research will be discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34456789
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672383
pmc: PMC8385144
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
672383Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Tagliabue, Zambelli, Sorgente, Sommer, Hoellger, Buhl and Lanz.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Nov;104(11):1404-1433
pubmed: 31045381
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Jun;74:74-89
pubmed: 31213233
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Oct;47(10):1677-1689
pubmed: 30937814
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Oct;32(7):992-997
pubmed: 30070570
Psychol Bull. 2015 Jul;141(4):858-900
pubmed: 25915035
J Pers. 2016 Oct;84(5):658-70
pubmed: 26112616
J Fam Psychol. 2014 Apr;28(2):168-79
pubmed: 24548009
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Oct;45(10):2185-96
pubmed: 27491416
Psychol Assess. 2019 Feb;31(2):192-209
pubmed: 30359049
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(2):262-73
pubmed: 23009025
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Oct;45(10):2094-107
pubmed: 27289553
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Jan;41(1):1-14
pubmed: 22773360
Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;118(2):357-78
pubmed: 21480740
Psychol Assess. 2011 Jun;23(2):388-97
pubmed: 21319905
Dev Psychol. 2020 May;56(5):970-977
pubmed: 32271076
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Jan;49(1):119-135
pubmed: 31254242