Management of post lobectomy subcutaneous emphysema; a case report with literature review.
Lobectomy
Negative pressure
Subcutaneous emphysema
Surgical emphysema
Journal
Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)
ISSN: 2049-0801
Titre abrégé: Ann Med Surg (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101616869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
30
05
2021
revised:
19
07
2021
accepted:
25
07
2021
entrez:
30
8
2021
pubmed:
31
8
2021
medline:
31
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Subcutaneous emphysema is an extremely rare complication after lobectomy. The current study aims to report a case of lung cancer developing extensive subcutaneous emphysema after lobectomy. A 73-year-old man presented with dyspnea and cough for one month duration associated with wheeze and sputum. He was a chronic heavy smoker (100 pack/year). Work up revealed squamous cell carcinoma. Although he had poor pulmonary function tests, he underwent left upper lobectomy. On the fifth postoperative day, he was discharged from the hospital as there was no air leak and the lung remained expanded 15 hours after clamping of the thoracostomy tube. Two days later, the patient developed generalized subcutaneous emphysema. The patient was re-admitted to the hospital and a thoracostomy tube was inserted. The lung expanded upon insertion while the subcutaneous emphysema remained the same and even slightly increased over night. A 3 cm incision was made at the left infra-clavicular area and a negative pressure applied to it. The subcutaneous emphysema completely subsided a few hours after this intervention. Because of the benign course, the majority of cases of subcutaneous emphysema (mild to moderate) only need nonoperative management alongside treatment of the predisposing factors. These patients may need nothing other than bed rest, good analgesia, supplemental oxygen, and reassurance. Subcutaneous emphysema after lobectomy prolongs hospital stay. It mainly occurs in cases with poor pulmonary function tests, steroid use, and those with extensive adhesion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34457249
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102610
pii: S2049-0801(21)00560-4
pmc: PMC8377524
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
102610Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016 Jan-Feb;7(1):55-6
pubmed: 26955588
AME Case Rep. 2019 Apr 25;3:11
pubmed: 31119212
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 2):673-7
pubmed: 26730086
Chest. 1991 Apr;99(4):1021-3
pubmed: 2009754
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;101(2):541-6
pubmed: 26603020
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;44:126-130
pubmed: 29501016
Lung India. 2012 Jan;29(1):70-2
pubmed: 22345920
Chest. 1992 Aug;102(2):503-5
pubmed: 1340766
Acta Chir Belg. 2019 Aug;119(4):251-253
pubmed: 29475402
Chest. 2002 Feb;121(2):647-9
pubmed: 11834684
Chest. 1990 Sep;98(3):772-3
pubmed: 2132739
Thorac Surg Clin. 2015 Aug;25(3):355-64
pubmed: 26210931
Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:226-230
pubmed: 33181358
Arch Intern Med. 1984 Jul;144(7):1447-53
pubmed: 6375617
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;89(4):1327-35
pubmed: 20338378
Intensive Care Med. 1984;10(1):43-4
pubmed: 6421917
Singapore Med J. 2007 Dec;48(12):e323-6
pubmed: 18043828
Pulm Med. 2012;2012:256878
pubmed: 22028963
Anaesthesia. 1995 Dec;50(12):1077-9
pubmed: 8546291
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jun;18(6):825-9
pubmed: 24572767
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013 Jun;30(2):133-40
pubmed: 24436529