Changes to an Active Learning Curriculum in Osteopathic Medical Education: Effects on Exam Outcomes and Board Scores.

Active learning Preclinical medical education Problem-based learning

Journal

Medical science educator
ISSN: 2156-8650
Titre abrégé: Med Sci Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101625548

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
entrez: 30 8 2021
pubmed: 3 1 2019
medline: 3 1 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

With the introduction of McMaster University's problem-based, self-directed learning and cognitive integration in the medical school curriculum, learning in small groups has been gaining popularity with medical schools worldwide. Problem-based learning (PBL) places emphasis on the value of basic medical sciences as the basis of learning medicine using clinical problems. For a successful outcome, a PBL curriculum needs to have a student-centered learning environment, problem-based design and facilitation, and assessment of learning in PBL domains. We describe a PBL program that has been used for undergraduate medical education, including changes made to learning resources and assessment. The changes required input from both faculty educators and students, and success depended on buy-in into the process. One of the changes included implementing the use of standard textbooks, which students use as the primary source of information during self-directed learning. Another change was the use of several reliable, valid, and cost-effective high-stakes written exams from internal and external sources, to promote spaced retrieval of biomedical facts and clinical contexts. By making these and other changes, we have been able to achieve pass rates and board scores which are consistently above the national average for 12 years. We conclude that in order to ensure sustainable successful outcomes, it is important to keep our program dynamic by making improvements in the PBL domains and assessment methods, taking into consideration students' course evaluations of the learning environment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34457470
doi: 10.1007/s40670-018-00674-1
pii: 674
pmc: PMC8368808
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

215-222

Informations de copyright

© International Association of Medical Science Educators 2019.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Références

Acad Med. 2010 Feb;85(2):349-55
pubmed: 20107367
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Jul;81(3):294-8
pubmed: 8374585
Acad Med. 2017 Aug;92(8):1061-1063
pubmed: 28742551
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1999 Oct;99(10):516-29
pubmed: 10578559
Teach Learn Med. 2000 Fall;12(4):196-200
pubmed: 11273369
Acad Med. 2014 Jul;89(7):1069-74
pubmed: 24826850
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Nov 22;12:88-89
pubmed: 27942381
Acad Med. 2005 Mar;80(3):294-9
pubmed: 15734816
Acad Med. 2007 Jan;82(1):74-82
pubmed: 17198294
J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jul;103(3):152-3
pubmed: 26213509
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):605-607
pubmed: 28813217
Acad Med. 2011 Jul;86(7):818-25
pubmed: 21617504

Auteurs

Naunihal Zaveri (N)

Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL USA.

Mark Coty (M)

Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine (LECOM), Bradenton, FL USA.

Victoria McCarver (V)

Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine (LECOM), Bradenton, FL USA.

Caleb Vidic (C)

Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine (LECOM), Bradenton, FL USA.

Todd Nolan (T)

Lake Erie College of Dental Medicine, Bradenton, FL USA.

Swapan Nath (S)

TCU and UNTHSC School of Medicine, Fort Worth, TX USA.

Cheryl Vanier (C)

Touro University Nevada, Henderson, NV USA.

Classifications MeSH