Apoptotic Gastritis in Melanoma Patients Treated With PD-1-Based Immune Checkpoint Inhibition - Clinical and Histopathological Findings Including the Diagnostic Value of Anti-Caspase-3 Immunohistochemistry.
PD-1
gastritis
immune check inhibitor (ICI)
immune related adverse effects
melanoma
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
15
06
2021
accepted:
23
07
2021
entrez:
30
8
2021
pubmed:
31
8
2021
medline:
31
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Gastritis induced by checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) is a rare but severe drug-related side effect. The reference standard for confirming CPI-associated gastritis (CPI-assGastritis) is histopathological assessment; however, the histopathological features of CPI-assGastritis are not yet adequately defined. Gastric biopsies of melanoma patients with histopathologically suspected CPI-assGastritis were compared with gastric biopsies of patients with inflammation free gastric mucosa (IFGM), type A, B, and C gastritis with respect to apoptosis count and predominant histopathological features. Immunohistochemical anti-caspase-3 staining was performed to identify apoptosis. Quantification was performed by manually counting the number of apoptotic events per 10 high-power fields (HPF). Clinical symptoms, treatment, and follow-up data of patients with CPI-assGastritis were examined. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney Five melanoma patients (three women, two men; median age: 45 years) were treated with PD-1-based CPI. The patients reported epigastric pain, weight loss, nausea, and vomiting. Histologically, the patients with CPI-assGastritis showed a partly lymphocytic, partly granulocytic inflammatory infiltrate. Manual counting of apoptotic cells in biopsy tissue slides stained against caspase 3 revealed a median of 6 apoptotic events/10 HPF (95% CI, 2.75-17.30) in the patients with CPI-assGastritis. Results for the comparison cohort (patients n = 21) were a median of 1 apoptotic event/10 HPF (95% CI, 0.5-4.5) for type-A gastritis (six patients), a median of 2 apoptotic events/10 HPF (95% CI, 0-4.5) for type-B gastritis (five patients), and no apoptosis for IFGM and type-C gastritis (five patients). Patients with CPI-assGastritis had a significantly higher apoptosis count than patients with IFGM (p<0.01), type A (p<0.05), B (p<0.05), and C gastritis (p<0.01). None of the CPI-assGastritis biopsies showed evidence of CPI-assGastritis manifests with nonspecific symptoms but histologically shows a high number of apoptotic events, which can best be visualized by anti-caspase-3 immunohistochemistry. This histopathological feature may help to histologically differentiate CPI-assGastritis from other forms of gastritis and inform decision-making regarding its optimal management.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Gastritis induced by checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) is a rare but severe drug-related side effect. The reference standard for confirming CPI-associated gastritis (CPI-assGastritis) is histopathological assessment; however, the histopathological features of CPI-assGastritis are not yet adequately defined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Gastric biopsies of melanoma patients with histopathologically suspected CPI-assGastritis were compared with gastric biopsies of patients with inflammation free gastric mucosa (IFGM), type A, B, and C gastritis with respect to apoptosis count and predominant histopathological features. Immunohistochemical anti-caspase-3 staining was performed to identify apoptosis. Quantification was performed by manually counting the number of apoptotic events per 10 high-power fields (HPF). Clinical symptoms, treatment, and follow-up data of patients with CPI-assGastritis were examined. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney
RESULTS
RESULTS
Five melanoma patients (three women, two men; median age: 45 years) were treated with PD-1-based CPI. The patients reported epigastric pain, weight loss, nausea, and vomiting. Histologically, the patients with CPI-assGastritis showed a partly lymphocytic, partly granulocytic inflammatory infiltrate. Manual counting of apoptotic cells in biopsy tissue slides stained against caspase 3 revealed a median of 6 apoptotic events/10 HPF (95% CI, 2.75-17.30) in the patients with CPI-assGastritis. Results for the comparison cohort (patients n = 21) were a median of 1 apoptotic event/10 HPF (95% CI, 0.5-4.5) for type-A gastritis (six patients), a median of 2 apoptotic events/10 HPF (95% CI, 0-4.5) for type-B gastritis (five patients), and no apoptosis for IFGM and type-C gastritis (five patients). Patients with CPI-assGastritis had a significantly higher apoptosis count than patients with IFGM (p<0.01), type A (p<0.05), B (p<0.05), and C gastritis (p<0.01). None of the CPI-assGastritis biopsies showed evidence of
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
CPI-assGastritis manifests with nonspecific symptoms but histologically shows a high number of apoptotic events, which can best be visualized by anti-caspase-3 immunohistochemistry. This histopathological feature may help to histologically differentiate CPI-assGastritis from other forms of gastritis and inform decision-making regarding its optimal management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34458154
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.725549
pmc: PMC8385713
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
725549Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Placke, Rawitzer, Reis, Rashidi-Alavijeh, Livingstone, Ugurel, Hadaschik, Griewank, Schmid, Schadendorf, Roesch and Zimmer.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
J-MP served as consultant and/or has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Novartis, and has received travel support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis and Therakos. HR is on the advisory board of Bristol-Myers Squibb, received honoraria from Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb, received travel support from Philips, Roche, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, received grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and holds shares of Bayer. EL served as consultant or/and has received honoraria from Amgen, Actelion, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Janssen, Medac, Sanofi, and Sunpharma, and travel support from Amgen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Pierre-Fabre, Sunpharma, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. SU received grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Novartis, grants and non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb; personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, and non-financial support from Amgen, outside the submitted work. DS received grants and other support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb during the conduct of the study, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from InFlarX, personal fees and other support from Roche, grants, personal fees and other support from Novartis, personal fees from Incyte, personal fees and other support from Regeneron, personal fees from 4SC, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Neracare, personal fees from Pierre-Fabre, personal fees and other support from Merck-EMD, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees and other support from Philogen, personal fees from Array, personal fees and other support from MSD Sharp & Dohme, outside the submitted work. AR reported grants from Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Adtec, personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, and nonfinancial support from Amgen, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Teva. LZ served as consultant and/or has received honoraria from Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, and Sanofi, research funding to institution from Novartis, travel support from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Pierre-Fabre, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 May;145(5):591-603
pubmed: 27247365
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 29;106(9):
pubmed: 25265940
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):1374-1385
pubmed: 27592805
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2019 Jan;35(1):83-88
pubmed: 30828153
ACG Case Rep J. 2017 Apr 12;4:e57
pubmed: 28459081
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1535-1546
pubmed: 31562797
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):2020-2031
pubmed: 31562796
Hum Pathol. 2009 Jul;40(7):909-17
pubmed: 19524102
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 24;20(17):
pubmed: 31450613
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jun;14(6):836-842
pubmed: 26748223
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Sep;23(9):1573-1579
pubmed: 28533059
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 28;26(16):1971-1978
pubmed: 32390707
J Clin Pathol. 2018 Aug;71(8):665-671
pubmed: 29703758
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1853-1862
pubmed: 28822576
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2016 Jul;14(7):662-81
pubmed: 27373241
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1345-1356
pubmed: 28889792
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;14(12):711-726
pubmed: 28951581
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):158-168
pubmed: 29320654
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Jan;19(1):3
pubmed: 28124291
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
Melanoma Res. 2018 Dec;28(6):645-647
pubmed: 30256271
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35
pubmed: 26028407
Histopathology. 2020 Mar;76(4):531-539
pubmed: 31692018
Case Rep Oncol. 2018 Aug 17;11(2):549-556
pubmed: 30186138
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1370-1385
pubmed: 31427204