Organ transplants of the future: planning for innovations including xenotransplantation.

clinical study design endpoints innovation organ shortage patient centred regulation

Journal

Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation
ISSN: 1432-2277
Titre abrégé: Transpl Int
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 8908516

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Historique:
revised: 10 08 2021
received: 30 06 2021
accepted: 24 08 2021
pubmed: 31 8 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 30 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The future clinical application of animal-to-human transplantation (xenotransplantation) is of importance to society as a whole. Favourable preclinical data relevant to cell, tissue and solid organ xenotransplants have been obtained from many animal models utilizing genetic engineering and protocols of pathogen-free husbandry. Findings have reached a tipping point, and xenotransplantation of solid organs is approaching clinical evaluation, the process of which now requires close deliberation. Such discussions include considering when there is sufficient evidence from preclinical animal studies to start first-in-human xenotransplantation trials. The present article is based on evidence and opinions formulated by members of the European Society for Organ Transplantation who are involved in the Transplantation Learning Journey project. The article includes a brief overview of preclinical concepts and biology of solid organ xenotransplantation, discusses the selection of candidates for first-in-human studies and considers requirements for study design and conduct. In addition, the paper emphasizes the need for a regulatory framework for xenotransplantation of solid organs and the essential requirement for input from public and patient stakeholders.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34459040
doi: 10.1111/tri.14031
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2006-2018

Subventions

Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI143887
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U01 AI153612
Pays : United States
Organisme : European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT)

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Lewis A, Koukoura A, Tsianos G-I, Gargavanis AA, Nielsen AA, Vassiliadis E. Organ donation in the US and Europe: The supply vs demand imbalance. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2020; 35: 100585.
US Department of Health and Human Services. OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual data report: Kidney. Available from: https://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2018/Kidney.aspx. Accessed August 6, 2021.
Eurotransplant. Yearly statistics. Available from: https://www.eurotransplant.org/statistics/yearly-statistics/. Accessed August 6, 2021.
DeRoos LJ, Marrero WJ, Tapper EB, et al. Estimated association between organ availability and presumed consent in solid organ transplant. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2: e1912431.
Arshad A, Anderson B, Sharif A. Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems. Kidney Int 2019; 95: 1453.
Danziger-Isakov L, Blumberg EA, Manuel O, Sester M. Impact of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2021; 21: 925.
Bellini MI, Pengel L, Potena L, Segantini L. ESOT COVID-19 Working Group. COVID-19 and education: restructuring after the pandemic. Transpl Int 2021; 34: 220.
Naeem SB, Bhatti R. The Covid-19 “infodemic”: a new front for information professionals. Health Info Libr J 2020; 37: 233.
Mehrotra R. Advancing American kidney health: an introduction. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 14: 1788.
Himmelfarb J, Vanholder R, Mehrotra R, Tonelli M. The current and future landscape of dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol 2020; 16: 573.
Consortium for Organ Preservation in Europe (COPE). List of approved research proposals for the liver trial (WP2). Available from: https://cope-eu.com/research/approved%20proposals-2. Accessed August 6, 2021.
Pinezich M, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Bioengineering approaches to organ preservation ex vivo. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2019; 244: 630.
Jochmans I, Brat A, Davies L, et al. Oxygenated versus standard cold perfusion preservation in kidney transplantation (COMPARE): a randomised, double-blind, paired, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020; 396: 1653. [Erratum in Lancet 2021; 396: 1978.]
Hosgood SA, Hoff M, Nicholson ML. Treatment of transplant kidneys during machine perfusion. Transpl Int 2021; 34: 224.
Weissenbacher A, Vrakas G, Nasralla D, Ceresa CDL. The future of organ perfusion and re-conditioning. Transpl Int 2019; 32: 586.
Leuning DG, Witjas FMR, Maanaoui M, et al. Vascular bioengineering of scaffolds derived from human discarded transplant kidneys using human pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelium. Am J Transplant 2019; 19: 1328.
Homan KA, Gupta N, Kroll KT, et al. Flow-enhanced vascularization and maturation of kidney organoids in vitro. Nat Methods 2019; 16: 255.
Hoogduijn MJ, Montserrat N, van der Laan LJW, et al. The emergence of regenerative medicine in organ transplantation: 1st European Cell Therapy and Organ Regeneration Section meeting. Transpl Int 2020; 33: 833.
Ekser B, Cooper DKC, Tector AJ. The need for xenotransplantation as a source of organs and cells for clinical transplantation. Int J Surg 2015; 23(Pt B): 199.
Ekser B, Li P, Cooper DKC. Xenotransplantation: past, present, and future. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2017; 22: 513.
Zhang X, Li X, Yang Z, et al. A review of pig liver xenotransplantation: current problems and recent progress. Xenotransplantation 2019; 26: e12497.
US Food and Drug Administration. Xenotransplantation. 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/xenotransplantation Accessed August 6, 2021 .
Cooper DKC, Ekser B, Tector AJ. A brief history of clinical xenotransplantation. Int J Surg 2015; 23(Pt B): 205.
Reemtsma K, McCracken BH, Schlegel JU, et al. Renal heterotransplantation in man. Ann Surg 1964; 160: 384.
Starzl TE, Fung J, Tzaki A, et al. Baboon-to-human liver transplantation. Lancet 1993; 341: 65.
Knott GJ, Doudna JA. CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering. Science 2018; 361: 866.
Morris T. The art of medicine. James Hardy and the first heart transplant. The Lancet 2017; 389: 2280.
Murthy R, Bajona P, Bhama JK, et al. Heart xenotransplantation: historical background, experimental progress, and clinical prospects. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 101: 1605.
Bailey LL, Nehlsen-Cannarella SL, Concepcion W, et al. Baboon-to-human cardiac xenotransplantation in a neonate. JAMA 1985; 254: 3321.
Davis MM, Brodin P. Rebooting human immunology. Annu Rev Immunol 2018; 36: 843.
Schuurman HJ. Regulatory aspects of clinical xenotransplantation. Int J Surg 2015; 23(Pt B): 312.
Pierson RN 3rd, Dorling A, Ayares D, et al. Current status of xenotransplantation and prospects for clinical application. Xenotransplantation 2009; 16: 263.
Hawthorne WJ, Cowan PJ, Bühler LH, et al. Third WHO global consultation on regulatory requirements for xenotransplantation clinical trials, Changsha, Hunan, China December 12-14, 2018: “The 2018 changsha communiqué” The 10-year anniversary of the international consultation on xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2019; 26: e12513.
Noordergraaf J, Schucker A, Martin M, et al. Pathogen elimination and prevention within a regulated, Designated Pathogen Free, closed pig herd for long-term breeding and production of xenotransplantation materials. Xenotransplantation 2018; 25: e12428.
Powell EJ, Charley S, Boettcher AN, et al. Creating effective biocontainment facilities and maintenance protocols for raising specific pathogen-free, severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) pigs. Lab Anim 2018; 52: 402.
Cooper DKC, Cowan P, Fishman JA, et al. Joint fda-ixa symposium, september 20, 2017. Xenotransplantation 2017; 24: e12365.
Cooper DKC, Pierson RN 3rd, Hering BJ, et al. Regulation of clinical xenotransplantation: time for a reappraisal. Transplantation 2017; 101: 1766.
Cooper DKC, Wijkstrom M, Hariharan S, et al. Selection of patients for initial clinical trials of solid organ xenotransplantation. Transplantation 2017; 101: 1551.
Cooper DKC, Hara H, Iwase H, et al. Pig kidney xenotransplantation: progress toward clinical trials. Clin Transplant 2021; 35: e14139.
Tseng YL, Kuwaki K, Dor FJ, et al. alpha1,3-Galactosyltransferase gene-knockout pig heart transplantation in baboons with survival approaching 6 months. Transplantation 2005; 80: 1493.
Mohiuddin MM, Singh AK, Corcoran PC, et al. Chimeric 2C10R4 anti-CD40 antibody therapy is critical for long-term survival of GTKO.hCD46.hTBM pig-to-primate cardiac xenograft. Nat Commun 2016; 7: 11138.
Längin M, Mayr T, Reichart B, et al. Consistent success in life-supporting porcine cardiac xenotransplantation. Nature 2018; 564: 430.
Kim SC, Mathews DV, Breeden CP, et al. Long-term survival of pig-to-rhesus macaque renal xenografts is dependent on CD4 T cell depletion. Am J Transplant 2019; 19: 2174.
Meier RPH, Muller YD, Balaphas A, et al. Xenotransplantation: back to the future? Transpl Int 2018; 31: 465.
Kemter E, Schnieke A, Fischer K, et al. Xeno-organ donor pigs with multiple genetic modifications - the more the better? Curr Opin Genet Dev 2020; 64: 60.
Reichart B, Längin M, Denner J, et al. Pathways to clinical cardiac xenotransplantation. Transplantation 2021; 105: 1930-1943.
Cooper DKC, Hara H, Iwase H, et al. Justification of specific genetic modifications in pigs for clinical organ xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2019; 26: e12516.
Yue Y, Xu W, Kan Y, et al. Extensive germline genome engineering in pigs. Nat Biomed Eng 2021; 5: 134.
Wolf E, Reichart B. Xenotransplantation solider Organe. Nephrologe 2021; 16: 138. [in German].
Adams AB, Lovasik BP, Faber DA, et al. Anti-C5 antibody tesidolumab reduces early antibody-mediated rejection and prolongs survival in renal xenotransplantation. Ann Surg 2021; 274: 473.
Meier RPH, Longchamp A, Mohiuddin M, et al. Recent progress and remaining hurdles toward clinical xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2021; 28: e12681.
Martens GR, Reyes LM, Li P, et al. Humoral reactivity of renal transplant-waitlisted patients to cells from GGTA1/CMAH/B4GalNT2, and SLA class i knockout pigs. Transplantation 2017; 101: e86.
Kemter E, Denner J, Wolf E. Will genetic engineering carry xenotransplantation of pig islets to the clinic? Curr Diab Rep 2018; 18: 103.
Reichart B, Längin M, Radan J, et al. Pig-to-non-human primate heart transplantation: the final step toward clinical xenotransplantation? J Heart Lung Transplant 2020; 39: 751.
Scobie L, Denner J. Theme issue on infections and safety: an introduction. Xenotransplantation 2018; 25: e12447.
Leibowitz ML, Papathanasiou S, Doerfler PA, et al. Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Nat Genet 2021; 53: 895.
Scobie L, Padler-Karavani V, Le Bas-Bernardet S, et al. Long-term IgG response to porcine Neu5Gc antigens without transmission of PERV in burn patients treated with porcine skin xenografts. J Immunol 2013; 191: 2907.
Matsumoto S, Wynyard S, Giovannangelo M, et al. Long-term follow-up for the microbiological safety of clinical microencapsulated neonatal porcine islet transplantation. Xenotransplantation 2020; 27: e12631.
Paradis K, Langford G, Long Z, et al. Search for cross-species transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus in patients treated with living pig tissue. The XEN 111 Study Group. Science 1999; 285: 1236.
McGregor CGA, Takeuchi Y, Scobie L, et al. PERVading strategies and infectious risk for clinical. Xenotransplantation 2018; 25: e12402.
Denner J, Scobie L, Schuurman HJ. Is it currently possible to evaluate the risk posed by PERVs for clinical xenotransplantation? Xenotransplantation 2018; 25: e12403.
Cooper DK, Keogh AM, Brink J, et al. Xenotransplantation Advisory Committee of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Report of the Xenotransplantation Advisory Committee of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: the present status of xenotransplantation and its potential role in the treatment of end-stage cardiac and pulmonary diseases. J Heart Lung Transplant 2000; 19: 1125.
EudraCT. Registering a trial in EudraCT and updating its information on EU CTR. Available from: https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/protocol.html. Accessed August 10, 2021.
US Food and Drug Administration. Clinical trials guidance documents. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/clinical-trials-guidance-documents. Accessed August 6, 2021.
European Medicines Agency. Clinical trials in human medicines. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/research-development/clinical-trials-human-medicines. Accessed August 10, 2021.
Schuurman H-J, Hoogendoorn K. Solid organ xenotransplantation at the interface between research and clinical development: regulatory aspects. Xenotransplantation 2020; 27: e12608.
European Medicines Agency. Xenogenic cell-based medicinal products. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/xenogeneic-cell-based-medicinal-products. Accessed August 6, 2021.
US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Source animal, product, preclinical, and clinical issues concerning the use of xenotransplantation products in humans; December 2016. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/source-animal-product-preclinical-and-clinical-issues-concerning-use-xenotransplantation-products. Accessed August 6, 2021.
International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Available from: https://www.ich.org/. Accessed August 6, 2021.
International Xenotransplantation Association 2016 consensus statement issue in Xenotransplantation. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/13993089/2016/23/1. Accessed August 6, 2021.
World Health Organization, Department of Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response. WHO guidance on xenogeneic infection/disease surveillance and response: a strategy for international cooperation and coordination. Document WHO/CDS/CSR/EPH/2001.2; 2001. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/68888. Accessed August 6, 2021.
European Medicines Agency. Legal framework: Advanced therapies. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/advanced-therapies/legal-framework-advanced-therapies. Accessed August 6, 2021.
organtrans.eu. Accessed August 6, . 2021.
Boráň T, Menezes-Ferreira M, Reischl I, et al. Clinical development and commercialization of advanced therapy medicinal products in the European Union: how are the product pipeline and regulatory framework evolving? Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev 2017; 28: 126.
Xenoislet.eu. Project description. Available from: http://xenoislet.eu/project_description. Accessed August 6, 2021.
Denner J. By definition…. Xenotransplantation 2020; 27: e12599.
Godehardt AW, Tönjes RR. Xenotransplantation of decellularized pig heart valves: regulatory aspects in Europe. Xenotransplantation 2020; 27: e12609.
Rayat GR, Gazda LS, Hawthorne WJ, et al. First update of the International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes - Chapter 3: Porcine islet product manufacturing and release testing criteria. Xenotransplantation 2016; 23: 38.
Hering BJ, O’Connell PJ. First update of the International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes-Chapter 6: patient selection for pilot clinical trials of islet xenotransplant. Xenotransplantation 2016; 23: 60.
Sobbrio P, Jorqui M. An overview of the role of society and risk in xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2014; 21: 523.
Abalovich A, Matsumoto S, Wechsler CJ, et al. Level of acceptance of islet cell and kidney xenotransplants by personnel of hospitals with and without experience in clinical xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2017; 24: e12315.
Amin L, Hashim H, Mahadi Z, Che Ngah A, Ismail K. Determinants of stakeholders’ attitudes to xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2018; 25: e12430.
Shimoda M, Matsumoto S. Update regarding xenotransplantation in Japan. Xenotransplantation 2019; 26: e12491.
Martínez-Alarcón L, Ríos A, Santainés-Borredá E, et al. Student nurses at Spanish universities and their attitude toward xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2019; 26: e12507.
Padilla LA, Sorabella RA, Carlo WF, et al. Attitudes to cardiac xenotransplantation by pediatric heart surgeons and physicians. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2020; 11: 426.
Kögel J, Marckmann G. “Xenotransplantation challenges us as a society”: what well-informed citizens think about xenotransplantation. EMBO Rep 2020; 21: e50274.
Kidney Health Initiative. Engaging the patient voice. Available from: https://khi.asn-online.org/pages/?ID=1. Accessed August 6, 2021.
Kidney Health Initiative. Overcoming barriers to innovation. Available from: https://khi.asn-online.org/pages/?ID=37. Accessed August 6, 2021.
Nair D, Cavanaugh KL. Measuring patient activation as part of kidney disease policy: are we there yet? J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 31: 1435.
Wang W, Liang Q, Nie W, Zhang J, Chen C. Biosafety barrier to xenotransplantation. Open access peer-reviewed chapter, published November 7, 2019. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/xenotransplantation-comprehensive-study/biosafety-barrier-to-xenotransplantation. Accessed August 6, 2021.
Fishman JA. Prevention of infection in xenotransplantation: Designated pathogen-free swine in the safety equation. Xenotransplantation 2020; 27: e12595.
Hartline CB, Conner RL, James SH, et al. Xenotransplantation panel for the detection of infectious agents in pigs. Xenotransplantation 2018; 25: e12427.
Schuurman H-J. Chapter 2: Source pigs. Xenotransplantation 2009; 16: 215
Pierson RN 3rd, Burdorf L, Madsen JC, Lewis GD, D’Alessandro DA. Pig-to-human heart transplantation: who goes first? Am J Transplant 2020; 20: 2669.
Pierson RN 3rd, Fishman JA, Lewis GD, et al. Progress toward cardiac xenotransplantation. Circulation 2020; 142: 1389.
Kögel J, Thiersch S, Ludwig B, et al. What does it take to consent to islet cell xenotransplantation? Insights from an interview study with type 1 diabetes patients and review of the literature. BMC Medical Ethics 2021; 22: 37.
Cecka JM, Calculated PRA. (CPRA): The new measure of sensitization for transplant candidates. Am J Transplant 2010; 20: 26.
Knoll MF, Cooper DKC, Bottino R. How the COVID-19 pandemic may impact public support for clinical xenotransplantation in the United States? Xenotransplantation 2020; 27: e12623.
Hundrieser J, Hein R, Pokoyski C, et al. Role of human and porcine MHC DRB1 alleles in determining the intensity of individual human anti-pig T-cell responses. Xenotransplantation 2019; 26: e12523.

Auteurs

Emanuele Cozzi (E)

Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Transplant Immunology Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy.

Stefan Schneeberger (S)

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.

Maria Irene Bellini (MI)

Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Department of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy.

Erik Berglund (E)

Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska Institute and ITB-MED, Stockholm, Sweden.

Georg Böhmig (G)

Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Kevin Fowler (K)

The Voice of the Patient, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.

Martin Hoogduijn (M)

Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Ina Jochmans (I)

Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Georg Marckmann (G)

Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Lorna Marson (L)

The Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

James Neuberger (J)

Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

Rainer Oberbauer (R)

Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Richard N Pierson (RN)

Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Bruno Reichart (B)

Walter Brendel Center for Experimental Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Linda Scobie (L)

Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

Colin White (C)

Irish Kidney Association, Dublin, Ireland.

Maarten Naesens (M)

Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH