Experience of mental health nurses regarding mechanical restraint in patients with psychomotor agitation: A qualitative study.

attitude of health personnel cognitive dissonance mental health nursing nurse's role physical restraint psychomotor agitation qualitative methods

Journal

Journal of clinical nursing
ISSN: 1365-2702
Titre abrégé: J Clin Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9207302

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Historique:
revised: 16 08 2021
received: 26 05 2021
accepted: 18 08 2021
pubmed: 31 8 2021
medline: 6 7 2022
entrez: 30 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To explore mental health nurses' experiences whilst managing a patient with psychomotor agitation, and the factors that influence the decision to use mechanical restraints. Psychomotor agitation is considered a potentially violent psychiatric emergency. The management of disruptive behaviours includes mechanical restraints as the last resort although its use has consequences for patients, professionals and the therapeutic relationship. A qualitative study design with a hermeneutical approach was developed. A total of 31 nurses were purposively sampled from six short- and medium-stay mental health inpatient units. Data were obtained from semi-structured interviews. A thematic content analysis following the seven steps of Colaizzi's method was performed. Three researchers independently conducted an inductive analysis within a perspective of a hermeneutic paradigm. The COREQ checklist was followed in carrying out this research. Four themes emerged from the analysis: 1) Nurses' perceptions of restraint methods, 2) Factors influencing decision-making, 3) Consequences for professionals of the use of mechanical restraint and 4) Alternatives to mechanical restraint. Aspects such as the importance of teamwork, the issue of cognitive dissonance, ethical conflict and barriers to effecting the withdrawal of these measures affect the mental health nurse's decision-making process. The understanding of these aspects is crucial to further reducing its incidence and negative consequences and achieving the elimination of mechanical restraints. Knowing how nurses feel during the patient's episode of psychomotor agitation and which factors influence the decision on whether to apply coercive methods can guide us on the quality of care offered.

Sections du résumé

AIM OBJECTIVE
To explore mental health nurses' experiences whilst managing a patient with psychomotor agitation, and the factors that influence the decision to use mechanical restraints.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Psychomotor agitation is considered a potentially violent psychiatric emergency. The management of disruptive behaviours includes mechanical restraints as the last resort although its use has consequences for patients, professionals and the therapeutic relationship.
DESIGN METHODS
A qualitative study design with a hermeneutical approach was developed.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 31 nurses were purposively sampled from six short- and medium-stay mental health inpatient units. Data were obtained from semi-structured interviews. A thematic content analysis following the seven steps of Colaizzi's method was performed. Three researchers independently conducted an inductive analysis within a perspective of a hermeneutic paradigm. The COREQ checklist was followed in carrying out this research.
RESULTS RESULTS
Four themes emerged from the analysis: 1) Nurses' perceptions of restraint methods, 2) Factors influencing decision-making, 3) Consequences for professionals of the use of mechanical restraint and 4) Alternatives to mechanical restraint.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Aspects such as the importance of teamwork, the issue of cognitive dissonance, ethical conflict and barriers to effecting the withdrawal of these measures affect the mental health nurse's decision-making process. The understanding of these aspects is crucial to further reducing its incidence and negative consequences and achieving the elimination of mechanical restraints.
RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE CONCLUSIONS
Knowing how nurses feel during the patient's episode of psychomotor agitation and which factors influence the decision on whether to apply coercive methods can guide us on the quality of care offered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34459048
doi: 10.1111/jocn.16027
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2142-2153

Subventions

Organisme : Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Barr, L., Wynaden, D., & Heslop, K. (2019). Promoting positive and safe care in forensic mental health inpatient settings: Evaluating critical factors that assist nurses to reduce the use of restrictive practices. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(4), 888-898. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12588.
Bregar, B., Skela-Savič, B., & Kores-Plesničar, B. (2018). Cross-sectional study on nurses’ attitudes regarding coercive measures: the importance of socio-demographic characteristics, job satisfaction, and strategies for coping with stress. BMC Psychiatry, 18, 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1756-1.
Chambers, M., Kantaris, X., Guise, V., & Valimiaki, M. (2015). Managing and caring for distressed and disturbed service users: The thoughts and feelings experienced by a sample of English mental health nurses. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(5), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12199.
Dahan, S., Levi, G., Behrbalk, P., Bronstein, I., Hirschmann, S., & Lev-Ran, S. (2018). The impact of ‘being there’: psychiatric staff attitudes on the use of restraint. Psychiatric Quarterly, 89, 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-017-9524-9.
Doedens, P., Vermeulen, J., Boyette, L.-L., Latour, C., & de-Haan, L., (2020). Influence of nursing staff attitudes and characteristics on the use of coercive measures in acute mental health services - A systematic review. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 27(4), 446-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12586.
Fernández-Costa, D., Gómez-Salgado, J., Fagundo-Rivera, J., Martín-Pereira, J., Prieto-Callejero, B., & García-Iglesias, J. J. (2020). Alternatives to the use of mechanical restraints in the management of agitation or aggressions of psychiatric patients: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(9), 2791. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092791.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
Gandhi, S. G., Poreddi, V. N., Palaniappan, M., Reddy, S. S. N., & BadaMath, S. (2018). Indian nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards use of physical restraints in psychiatric patients. Investigación Y Educación En Enfermería, 36(1), e10. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v36n1e10.
Garriga, M., Pacchiarotti, I., Kasper, S., Zeller, S. L., Allen, M. H., Vázquez, G., Baldaçara, L., San, L., McAllister-Williams, R. H., Fountoulakis, K. N., Courtet, P., Naber, D., Chan, E. W., Fagiolini, A., Möller, H. J., Grunze, H., Llorca, P. M., Jaffe, R. L., Yatham, L. N., … Vieta, E. (2016). Assessment and management of agitation in psychiatry: Expert consensus. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 17(2), 86-128. https://doi.org/10.3109/15622975.2015.1132007.
Gerace, A., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2019). Perceptions of nurses working with psychiatric consumers regarding the elimination of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient settings and emergency departments: An Australian survey. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(1), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12522.
Giacchero-Vedana, K. G., Maria-da-Silva, D., Arena-Ventura, C. A., Ciccone-Giacon, B. C., Guidorizzi-Zanetti, A. C., Inocenti-Miasso, A., & Longo-Borges, T. (2018). Physical and mechanical restraint in psychiatric units: Perceptions and experiences of nursing staff. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 32(3), 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2017.11.027.
Goulet, M., Larue, C., & Dumais, A. (2017). Evaluation of seclusion and restraint reduction programs in mental health: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.019.
Guba, G., & Lincoln, S. (1990). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage.
Guzmán-Parra, J., Aguilera-Serrano, C., García-Sanchez, J. A., García-Spínola, E., Torres-Campos, D., Villagrán, J. M., Moreno-Küstner, B., & Mayoral-Cleries, F. (2019). Experience coercion, post-traumatic stress, and satisfaction with treatment associated with different coercive measures during psychiatric hospitalization. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(2), 448-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12546.
Holton, J. A. (2010). The coding process and its challenges. The Grounded Theory Review, 9(1), 20-40. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941.n13.
Jalil, R., Huber, J. W., Sixmith, J., & Dickens, G. L. (2017). Mental health nurses’ emotions, exposure to patient aggression, attitudes to and use of coercive measures: Cross sectional questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 75, 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.07.018.
Keser Özcan, N., Bilgin, H., Akın, M., & Elçin, N. (2015). Nurses’ attitudes towards professional containment methods used in psychiatric wards and perceptions of aggression in Turkey. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24, 2881-2889. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12903.
Kinner, S. A., Harvey, C., Hamilton, B., Brophy, L., Roper, C., McSherry, B., & Young, J. T. (2017). Attitudes towards seclusion and restraint in mental health settings: Findings from a large, community based survey of consumers, carers and mental health professionals. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 26, 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796016000585.
Kodal, J.S., Kajaer, J.N., & Larsen, E. R. (2018). Mechanical restraint and characteristics of patient, staff and shifts in a psychiatric ward. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 72(2), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2017.1393560.
Korkeila, H., Koivisto, A., Paavilainen, E., & Kylmä, J. (2016). Psychiatric nurses’ emotional and ethical experiences regarding seclusion and restraint. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 3(37), 464-475. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2016.1163626.
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs. European Journal of General Practice, 23(1), 274-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090.
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092.
Laukkanen, E., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K., Louheranta, O., & Kuosmanen, L. (2019). Psychiatric nursing staffs’ attitudes towards the use of containment methods in psychiatric inpatient care: An integrative review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28, 390-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12574.
Mahmoud, A. S. (2017). Psychiatric nurses’ attitude and practice toward physical restraint. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 31, 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2016.07.013.
Mangaoil, R. A., Cleverley, K., & Peter, E. (2020). Immediate staff debriefing following seclusion or restraint use in inpatient mental health settings: A scoping review. Clinical Nursing Research, 29(7), 479-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773818791085.
Martello, M., Doronina, O., Perillo, A., La-Riccia, P., & Lavoie-Tremblay, M. (2018). Nurses’ perceptions of engaging with patients to reduce restrictive practices in an inpatient psychiatric unit. Health Care Manager, 37(4), 342-353. https://doi.org/10.1097/hcm.0000000000000235.
McKeown, M., Thomson, G., Scholes, A., Jones, F., Baker, J., Downe, S., Price, O., Greenwood, P., Whittington, R., & Duxbury, J. (2019). “Catching your tail and firefighting”: The impact of staffing levels on restraint minimization efforts. Journal of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing, 26(5-6), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12532.
Morley, J. (2018). Phenomenology in nursing studies: New perspectives - Commentary. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 93, 163-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.002.
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091.
Muir-Cochrane, E., O’Kane, D., & Oster, C. (2018). Fear and blame in mental health nurses’ accounts of restrictive practices: Implications for the elimination of seclusion and restraint. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27(5), 1511-2152. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12451.
Muralidharan, S., & Fenton, M. (2006). Containment strategies for people with serious mental illness. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 19(3), CD002084. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd002084.pub2.
Obay, A. A., & Ferial, A. H. (2019). Use of restraint and seclusion in psychiatric settings: A literature review. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 57(4), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20181022-01.
Raboch, J., Kališová, L., Nawka, A., Kitzlerová, E., Onchev, G., Karastergiou, A., Magliano, L., Dembinskas, A., Kiejna, A., Torres-Gonzales, F., Kjellin, L., Priebe, S., & Kallert, T. W. (2010). Use of coercive measures during involuntary hospitalization: Findings from ten European countries. Psychiatric Services, 61(10), 1012-1017. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2010.61.10.1012.
Riahi, S., Thomson, G., & Duxbury, J. (2016). An integrative review exploring decision-making factors influencing mental health nurses in the use of restraint. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 23, 116-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12285.
Sailas, E., & Fenton, M. (2000). Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2000(2), CD001163 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001163.
Salzmann-Erikson, M. (2018). Moral mindfulness: The ethical concerns of healthcare professionals working in a psychiatric intensive care unit. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27, 1851-1860. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12494.
San, L., Marksteiner, J., Zwanzger, P., Figuero, M. A., Romero, F. T., Kyropoulos, G., Peixoto, A. B., Chirita, R., & Boldeanu, A. (2016). State of acute agitation at psychiatric emergencies in Europe: The STAGE study. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, 12, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901612010075.
Sanders, C. (2003). Application of Colaizzi’s method: interpretation of an auditable decision trail by a novice researcher. Contemporary Nurse, 14(292), 302-339. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.14.3.292.
Snorrason, J., & Biering, P. (2018). The attributes of successful de-escalation and restraint teams. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27, 1842-1850. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12493.
Spector, P. E., Zhou, Z. E., & Che, X. X. (2014). Nurse exposure to physical and nonphysical violence, bullying, and sexual harassment: a quantitative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(1), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.01.010.
Tingleff, E. B., Hounsgaard, L., Bradley, S. K., & Gildberg, F. A. (2019). Forensic psychiatric patients’ perceptions of situations associated with mechanical restraint: A qualitative interview study. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(2), 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12549.
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
Varpula, J., Välimäki, M., Lantta, T., Berg, J., & Lahti, M. (2020). Nurses’ perceptions of risks for occupational hazards in patient seclusion and restraint practices in psychiatric inpatient care: A focus group study. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 29, 703-771. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12705.
Vieta, E., Garriga, M., Cardete, L., Bernardo, M., Lombraña, M., Blanch, J., Catalán, R., Vázquez, M., Soler, V., Ortuño, N., & Martínez-Arán, A. (2017). Protocol for the management of psychiatric patients with psychomotor agitation. BMC Psychiatry, 17, 328. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1490-0.
Ye, J., Wang, C., Xiao, A., Xia, Z., Yu, L., Lin, J., Liao, Y., Xu, Y. U., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Physical restraint in mental health nursing: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 6(3), 343-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.04.002.

Auteurs

Yasmina Manzano-Bort (Y)

Research Group on Patient Safety, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.

Ramón Mir-Abellán (R)

Patient Safety Department, Research Group on Patient Safety, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.

Gemma Via-Clavero (G)

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Nursing Research Group (GRIN-IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.

Jaime Llopis-Cañameras (J)

Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.

Montserrat Escuté-Amat (M)

Nursing Management Department, Research Group on Patient Safety, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.

Anna Falcó-Pegueroles (A)

School of Nursing Faculty of Medicine and Healthf Sciences, Consolidated Research Group SGR 269 Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona (Spain, Research Group on Patient Safety, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH