Post-Market Surveillance Assessment of the Clinical Accuracy of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System with an Improved Algorithm for Enhanced Product Performance.
MARD
accuracy
blood glucose monitoring (BGM)
post-market surveillance (PMS)
regulations
Journal
Journal of diabetes science and technology
ISSN: 1932-2968
Titre abrégé: J Diabetes Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101306166
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
1
9
2021
medline:
4
1
2023
entrez:
31
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
On-going manufacturer-led post-market surveillance (PMS), assessing the clinical accuracy of blood glucose monitoring (BGM) systems, is critical to substantiate the performance of such products for people with diabetes. Batches of Verio test-strip product were randomly and routinely selected over the period from launch of an improved-algorithm product to reporting date and sent to 3 clinic sites for clinician-led accuracy assessment. Accuracy is reported as per recently adopted FDA guidance for BGM systems, EN ISO 15197:2015 and MARD/MAD (Mean absolute relative difference/Mean absolute difference). Thirty-three individual test-strip batches were evaluated corresponding to 506 unique donors. Accuracy performance - FDA: 98.9% of values within ±15% of comparator; ISO: 99.0% within ±15 mg/dL or ±15% at <100 mg/dL (<5.55 mmol/L) or ≥100 mg/dL (≥5.55 mmol/L) glucose, respectively. Overall MARD was 4.19% with a MARD range of 3.54%-5.73% across all test strip batches. This post-market surveillance program demonstrates the new BGM system consistently meets measures of clinical accuracy specified by regulators. This program supports a growing demand by regulators for real-world evidence demonstrating consistent in-market product efficacy as opposed to the current largely passive approach that relies on assessment of reports filed by device users.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
On-going manufacturer-led post-market surveillance (PMS), assessing the clinical accuracy of blood glucose monitoring (BGM) systems, is critical to substantiate the performance of such products for people with diabetes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Batches of Verio test-strip product were randomly and routinely selected over the period from launch of an improved-algorithm product to reporting date and sent to 3 clinic sites for clinician-led accuracy assessment. Accuracy is reported as per recently adopted FDA guidance for BGM systems, EN ISO 15197:2015 and MARD/MAD (Mean absolute relative difference/Mean absolute difference).
RESULTS
Thirty-three individual test-strip batches were evaluated corresponding to 506 unique donors. Accuracy performance - FDA: 98.9% of values within ±15% of comparator; ISO: 99.0% within ±15 mg/dL or ±15% at <100 mg/dL (<5.55 mmol/L) or ≥100 mg/dL (≥5.55 mmol/L) glucose, respectively. Overall MARD was 4.19% with a MARD range of 3.54%-5.73% across all test strip batches.
CONCLUSIONS
This post-market surveillance program demonstrates the new BGM system consistently meets measures of clinical accuracy specified by regulators. This program supports a growing demand by regulators for real-world evidence demonstrating consistent in-market product efficacy as opposed to the current largely passive approach that relies on assessment of reports filed by device users.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34463143
doi: 10.1177/19322968211039465
pmc: PMC9846413
doi:
Substances chimiques
Blood Glucose
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
133-140Références
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):558-566
pubmed: 27697848
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Sep;12(5):1016-1023
pubmed: 29845873
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jul;12(4):873-879
pubmed: 29648465
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May;13(3):419-423
pubmed: 30974987
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1089-1095
pubmed: 33759584
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 May;15(3):717-718
pubmed: 33615839
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 07;10(1):85-92
pubmed: 26445813
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):895-910
pubmed: 25990294
Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1681-1688
pubmed: 29898901
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):1155-1165
pubmed: 31318470
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 May 03;10(3):697-707
pubmed: 26481642
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Jan;14(1):135-150
pubmed: 31216870
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 May;16(3):649-658
pubmed: 33615834
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May;13(3):575-583
pubmed: 30453761
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jan 01;4(1):75-83
pubmed: 20167170
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):673-84
pubmed: 25562887
P T. 2019 Sep;44(9):550-553
pubmed: 31485150
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jan;15(1):67-75
pubmed: 30730221
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jan;15(1):82-90
pubmed: 31478385
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Jan;14(1):174-179
pubmed: 30841738
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 May 01;4(3):562-70
pubmed: 20513321
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):658-72
pubmed: 25562886
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1155-1162
pubmed: 28406040
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1182-7
pubmed: 27118729