Automated Detection of Ischemic Stroke and Subsequent Patient Triage in Routinely Acquired Head CT.
Artificial intelligence
Computed tomography
Emergency imaging
Machine learning
Stroke
Journal
Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
24
02
2021
accepted:
02
08
2021
pubmed:
1
9
2021
medline:
15
6
2022
entrez:
31
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Advanced machine-learning (ML) techniques can potentially detect the entire spectrum of pathology through deviations from a learned norm. We investigated the utility of a weakly supervised ML tool to detect characteristic findings related to ischemic stroke in head CT and provide subsequent patient triage. Patients having undergone non-enhanced head CT at a tertiary care hospital in April 2020 with either no anomalies, subacute or chronic ischemia, lacunar infarcts of the deep white matter or hyperdense vessel signs were retrospectively analyzed. Anomaly detection was performed using a weakly supervised ML classifier. Findings were displayed on a voxel-level (heatmap) and pooled to an anomaly score. Thresholds for this score classified patients into i) normal, ii) inconclusive, iii) pathological. Expert-validated radiological reports were considered as ground truth. Test assessment was performed with ROC analysis; inconclusive results were pooled to pathological predictions for accuracy measurements. During the investigation period 208 patients were referred for head CT of which 111 could be included. Definite ratings into normal/pathological were feasible in 77 (69.4%) patients. Based on anomaly scores, the AUC to differentiate normal from pathological scans was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-1.00). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 40.6%, 80.6% and 100%, respectively. Our study demonstrates the potential of a weakly supervised anomaly-detection tool to detect stroke findings in head CT. Definite classification into normal/pathological was made with high accuracy in > 2/3 of patients. Anomaly heatmaps further provide guidance towards pathologies, also in cases with inconclusive ratings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34463778
doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01081-7
pii: 10.1007/s00062-021-01081-7
pmc: PMC9187535
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
419-426Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Aug;36(8):1419-25
pubmed: 25999410
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5
pubmed: 15405679
Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2388-2396
pubmed: 30318264
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Mar 21;4:540-8
pubmed: 24818079
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000 Nov-Dec;10(6):419-23
pubmed: 11070370
Lancet. 2000 May 13;355(9216):1670-4
pubmed: 10905241
BMJ. 2013 May 16;346:f2778
pubmed: 23682043
Radiographics. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):1285-97; discussion 1297-9
pubmed: 22977018
Semin Neurol. 2018 Apr;38(2):208-211
pubmed: 29791947
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36
pubmed: 7063747
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 May;22(4):406-12
pubmed: 22133744
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2033-44
pubmed: 20851191
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Jun;39(6):1074-1082
pubmed: 29674417
Front Neuroinform. 2020 Mar 24;14:13
pubmed: 32265682
Stroke. 2019 Jan;50(1):34-37
pubmed: 30566036
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418
pubmed: 31662037
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 12;8(1):13650
pubmed: 30209345
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Mar;4(1):6-12
pubmed: 31165090