A scanner-specific framework for simulating CT images with tube current modulation.
DukeSim
computed tomography (CT)
simulation
tube current modulation (TCM)
virtual imaging trial (VIT)
Journal
Physics in medicine and biology
ISSN: 1361-6560
Titre abrégé: Phys Med Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401220
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 09 2021
13 09 2021
Historique:
received:
18
06
2021
accepted:
31
08
2021
pubmed:
1
9
2021
medline:
7
1
2022
entrez:
31
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although tube current modulation (TCM) is routinely implemented in modern computed tomography (CT) scans, no existing CT simulator is capable of generating realistic images with TCM. The goal of this study was to develop such a framework to (1) facilitate patient-specific optimization of TCM parameters and (2) enable future virtual imaging trials (VITs) with more clinically realistic image quality and x-ray flux distributions. The framework was created by developing a TCM module and integrating it with an existing CT simulator (DukeSim). The developed module utilizes scanner-calibrated TCM parameters and two localizer radiographs to compute the mAs for each simulated CT projection. This simulation pipeline was validated in two parts. First, DukeSim was validated in the context of a commercial scanner with TCM (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthineers) by imaging a physical CT phantom (Mercury, Sun Nuclear) and its computational analogue. Second, the TCM module was validated by imaging a computational anthropomorphic phantom (ATOM, CIRS) using DukeSim with real and module-generated TCM profiles. The validation demonstrated DukeSim's realism in terms of noise magnitude, noise texture, spatial resolution, and image contrast (with average differences of 0.38%, 6.31%, 0.43%, and -9 HU, respectively). It also demonstrated the TCM module's realism in terms of projection-level mAs and resulting noise magnitude (2.86% and -2.60%, respectively). Finally, the framework was applied to a pilot VIT simulating images of three computational anthropomorphic phantoms (XCAT, with body mass indices (BMIs) of 24.3, 28.2, and 33.0) under five different TCM settings. The optimal TCM for each phantom was characterized based on various criteria, such as minimizing mAs or maximizing image quality. 'Very Weak' TCM minimized noise for the 24.3 BMI phantom, while 'Very Strong' TCM minimized noise for the 33.0 BMI phantom. This illustrates the utility of the developed framework for future optimization studies of TCM parameters and, more broadly, large-scale VITs with scanner-specific TCM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34464942
doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac2269
pmc: PMC8552241
mid: NIHMS1747253
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : P41 EB028744
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB001838
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
Références
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Nov 04;64(21):215020
pubmed: 31539892
Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):4878-80
pubmed: 19994495
Med Phys. 2019 Nov;46(11):5262-5272
pubmed: 31442324
Med Phys. 1999 Nov;26(11):2248-53
pubmed: 10587205
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Mar 23;66(7):
pubmed: 33652421
Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):649-57
pubmed: 15498896
Med Phys. 2011 Jan;38(1):397-407
pubmed: 21361208
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 May-Jun;39(3):437-42
pubmed: 25938214
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2019 Jan;3(1):47-53
pubmed: 31559375
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Mar;200(3):592-600
pubmed: 23436849
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jul;4(3):031208
pubmed: 28804730
Med Phys. 1999 Nov;26(11):2235-47
pubmed: 10587204
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2019 Aug;5(5):
pubmed: 33304618
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jun 21;62(12):4777-4797
pubmed: 28362638
Med Phys. 2017 Aug;44(8):4262-4275
pubmed: 28477342
Med Phys. 2015 Apr;42(4):1575-85
pubmed: 25832048
Med Phys. 2015 Aug;42(8):4941-53
pubmed: 26233220
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jul 21;60(14):5601-25
pubmed: 26134511
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Mar;37(3):693-702
pubmed: 29533891
Radiographics. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):1451-9
pubmed: 18794318
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 22;9(7):e103054
pubmed: 25051067
Med Phys. 2017 Feb;44(2):665-678
pubmed: 28032894
Med Phys. 2001 Apr;28(4):475-90
pubmed: 11339744
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Aug 21;59(16):4525-48
pubmed: 25069102
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Jul;7(4):042805
pubmed: 32313817
Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(5):2139-2149
pubmed: 32086943
Med Phys. 2004 Oct;31(10):2811-8
pubmed: 15543788
Med Phys. 2010 Sep;37(9):4902-15
pubmed: 20964209
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Jun;38(6):1457-1465
pubmed: 30561344
Radiographics. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):503-12
pubmed: 16549613
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Feb;216(2):362-368
pubmed: 32822224