Perceived Causal Problem Networks: Reliability, Central Problems, and Clinical Utility for Depression.

CBT case conceptualization cognitive behavioral therapy comorbidity depression network analysis nosology

Journal

Assessment
ISSN: 1552-3489
Titre abrégé: Assessment
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9431219

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 2 9 2021
medline: 23 11 2022
entrez: 1 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Personalized case conceptualization is often regarded as a prerequisite for treatment success in psychotherapy for patients with comorbidity. This article presents Perceived Causal Networks, a novel method in which patients rate perceived causal relations among behavioral and emotional problems. First, 231 respondents screening positive for depression completed an online Perceived Causal Networks questionnaire. Median completion time (including repeat items to assess immediate test-retest reliability) was 22.7 minutes, and centrality measures showed excellent immediate test-retest reliability. Networks were highly idiosyncratic, but worrying and ruminating were the most central items for a third of respondents. Second, 50 psychotherapists rated the clinical utility of Perceived Causal Networks visualizations. Ninety-six percent rated the networks as clinically useful, and the information in the individual visualizations was judged to contain 47% of the information typically collected during a psychotherapy assessment phase. Future studies should individualize networks further and evaluate the validity of perceived causal relations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34467772
doi: 10.1177/10731911211039281
pmc: PMC9684655
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

73-83

Références

Psychometrika. 2022 Mar;87(1):188-213
pubmed: 34390455
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 23;18(1):345
pubmed: 33222699
CMAJ. 2012 Feb 21;184(3):E191-6
pubmed: 22184363
BMC Med. 2020 Apr 8;18(1):99
pubmed: 32264914
Psychol Med. 2016 Feb;46(3):551-62
pubmed: 26621339
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:164-182
pubmed: 29100149
Psychol Med. 2020 Feb;50(3):353-366
pubmed: 31875792
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Dec;131(4):451-76
pubmed: 12500858
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(4):249-251
pubmed: 29680835
Behav Res Ther. 2019 May;116:69-79
pubmed: 30831478
World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):5-13
pubmed: 28127906
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018 Sep;25(5):672-691
pubmed: 29791045
World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):269-293
pubmed: 32931110
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Nov-Dec;29(6):492-500
pubmed: 18022042
Assessment. 2012 Dec;19(4):480-93
pubmed: 21862529
J Clin Psychol. 2016 Jun;72(6):517-33
pubmed: 26918548
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Nov;128(8):892-903
pubmed: 31318245
Psychol Health. 2017 Sep;32(9):1152-1166
pubmed: 28498009
Psychol Assess. 2021 Feb;33(2):122-132
pubmed: 33119376
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jun;32(6):541-552
pubmed: 32118458
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2013 Aug 30;4:
pubmed: 24003362

Auteurs

Lars Klintwall (L)

Stockholm University. Stockholm, Sweden.

Martin Bellander (M)

Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Matti Cervin (M)

Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH