Consumer Perspectives on Maternal and Infant Health Apps: Qualitative Content Analysis.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2021
Historique:
received: 23 01 2021
accepted: 05 07 2021
revised: 05 06 2021
entrez: 1 9 2021
pubmed: 2 9 2021
medline: 29 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite the popularity of maternal and infant health mobile apps, ongoing consumer engagement and sustained app use remain barriers. Few studies have examined user experiences or perceived benefits of maternal and infant health app use from consumer perspectives. This study aims to assess users' self-reported experiences with maternal and infant health apps, perceived benefits, and general feedback by analyzing publicly available user reviews on two popular app stores-Apple App Store and Google Play Store. We conducted a qualitative assessment of publicly available user reviews (N=2422) sampled from 75 maternal and infant health apps designed to provide health education or decision-making support to pregnant women or parents and caregivers of infants. The reviews were coded and analyzed using a general inductive qualitative content analysis approach. The three major themes included the following: app functionality, where users discussed app features and functions; technical aspects, where users talked about technology-based aspects of an app; and app content, where users specifically focused on the app content and the information it provides. The six minor themes included the following: patterns of use, where users highlighted the frequency and type of use; social support, where users talked about receiving social support from friends, family and community of other users; app cost, where users talked about the cost of an app within the context of being cost-effective or a potential waste of money; app comparisons, where users compared one app with others available in app stores; assistance in health care, where users specifically highlighted the role of an app in offering clinical assistance; and customer care support, where users specifically talked about their interaction with the app customer care support team. Users generally tend to value apps that are of low cost and preferably free, with high-quality content, superior features, enhanced technical aspects, and user-friendly interfaces. Users also find app developer responsiveness to be integral, as it offers them an opportunity to engage in the app development and delivery process. These findings may be beneficial for app developers in designing better apps, as no best practice guidelines currently exist for the app environment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Despite the popularity of maternal and infant health mobile apps, ongoing consumer engagement and sustained app use remain barriers. Few studies have examined user experiences or perceived benefits of maternal and infant health app use from consumer perspectives.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to assess users' self-reported experiences with maternal and infant health apps, perceived benefits, and general feedback by analyzing publicly available user reviews on two popular app stores-Apple App Store and Google Play Store.
METHODS
We conducted a qualitative assessment of publicly available user reviews (N=2422) sampled from 75 maternal and infant health apps designed to provide health education or decision-making support to pregnant women or parents and caregivers of infants. The reviews were coded and analyzed using a general inductive qualitative content analysis approach.
RESULTS
The three major themes included the following: app functionality, where users discussed app features and functions; technical aspects, where users talked about technology-based aspects of an app; and app content, where users specifically focused on the app content and the information it provides. The six minor themes included the following: patterns of use, where users highlighted the frequency and type of use; social support, where users talked about receiving social support from friends, family and community of other users; app cost, where users talked about the cost of an app within the context of being cost-effective or a potential waste of money; app comparisons, where users compared one app with others available in app stores; assistance in health care, where users specifically highlighted the role of an app in offering clinical assistance; and customer care support, where users specifically talked about their interaction with the app customer care support team.
CONCLUSIONS
Users generally tend to value apps that are of low cost and preferably free, with high-quality content, superior features, enhanced technical aspects, and user-friendly interfaces. Users also find app developer responsiveness to be integral, as it offers them an opportunity to engage in the app development and delivery process. These findings may be beneficial for app developers in designing better apps, as no best practice guidelines currently exist for the app environment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34468323
pii: v23i9e27403
doi: 10.2196/27403
pmc: PMC8444044
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e27403

Subventions

Organisme : NLM NIH HHS
ID : T15 LM012502
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Rizwana Biviji, Karmen S Williams, Joshua R Vest, Brian E Dixon, Theresa Cullen, Christopher A Harle. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 01.09.2021.

Références

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Dec 22;5(12):e203
pubmed: 29273575
PLoS One. 2016 May 23;11(5):e0156164
pubmed: 27214203
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Nov 04;3(4):e101
pubmed: 26537656
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 24;8(1):e15663
pubmed: 32012107
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov;20(Suppl 1):13-21
pubmed: 27639571
Int J Telemed Appl. 2013;2013:782074
pubmed: 24454354
Ir Med J. 2014 Nov-Dec;107(10):313-5
pubmed: 25556255
Evid Based Med. 2013 Jun;18(3):90-2
pubmed: 22923708
J Obes. 2014;2014:573928
pubmed: 24872891
Int J Telemed Appl. 2012;2012:973237
pubmed: 23304136
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Jul;16(5):1092-101
pubmed: 21688111
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):504-515
pubmed: 32491165
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 07;19(4):e105
pubmed: 28389420
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002 Jul-Aug;34(4):224-30
pubmed: 12217266
JMIR Res Protoc. 2012 Aug 22;1(2):e9
pubmed: 23611892
Healthc Inform Res. 2016 Apr;22(2):73-80
pubmed: 27200216
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 May 24;4(2):e47
pubmed: 27220371
Med 2 0. 2015 Mar 02;4(1):e1
pubmed: 25733033

Auteurs

Rizwana Biviji (R)

Science of Healthcare Delivery, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.

Karmen S Williams (KS)

Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.

Joshua R Vest (JR)

Department of Health Policy and Management, Richard M Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Brian E Dixon (BE)

Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health,, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Theresa Cullen (T)

Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Department of Family Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Christopher A Harle (CA)

Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH