Effectiveness of Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Outbreak among Horse Racetrack Workers, California, USA.

COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing coronavirus disease disease outbreaks respiratory infections severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viruses workplace zoonoses

Journal

Emerging infectious diseases
ISSN: 1080-6059
Titre abrégé: Emerg Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9508155

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 2 9 2021
medline: 28 10 2021
entrez: 1 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Abbott BinaxNOW rapid antigen test is cheaper and faster than real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. We compared BinaxNOW with rRT-PCR in 769 paired specimens from 342 persons during a coronavirus disease outbreak among horse racetrack workers in California, USA. We found positive percent agreement was 43.3% (95% CI 34.6%-52.4%), negative percent agreement 100% (95% CI 99.4%-100%), positive predictive value 100% (95% CI 93.5%-100%), and negative predictive value 89.9% (95% CI 87.5%-92.0%). Among 127 rRT-PCR-positive specimens, the 55 with paired BinaxNOW-positive results had a lower mean cycle threshold than the 72 with paired BinaxNOW-negative results (17.8 vs. 28.5; p<0.001). Of 100 specimens with cycle threshold <30, a total of 51 resulted in positive virus isolation; 45 (88.2%) of those were BinaxNOW-positive. Our comparison supports immediate isolation for BinaxNOW-positive persons and confirmatory testing for negative persons.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34469287
doi: 10.3201/eid2711.211449
pmc: PMC8544964
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antigens, Viral 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2761-2767

Références

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 01;8(2):ofab050
pubmed: 33623808
Am J Ind Med. 2021 Apr;64(4):227-237
pubmed: 33491195
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 22;70(3):100-105
pubmed: 33476316
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5):
pubmed: 33622768
J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 8;223(7):1139-1144
pubmed: 33394052
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3098-e3101
pubmed: 33367619
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Jan 25;:1-3
pubmed: 33487197
J Infect. 2021 Mar;82(3):414-451
pubmed: 33131699
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):e120
pubmed: 32997903
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2249-2251
pubmed: 32374370
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Mar 19;59(4):
pubmed: 33509809
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jul 10;69(27):887-892
pubmed: 32644986

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH