A comparative study of strategies for identifying credible sources of mental health information online: Can clinical services deliver a youth-specific internet prescription?
DISCERN tool
adolescents
health on the net
help seeking
internet
mental health
Journal
Early intervention in psychiatry
ISSN: 1751-7893
Titre abrégé: Early Interv Psychiatry
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101320027
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
13
07
2021
accepted:
15
08
2021
pubmed:
3
9
2021
medline:
7
6
2022
entrez:
2
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Adolescents and young adults undertake internet searches before and after attending mental health consultations, but they express concerns about how they can identify reliable online mental health information (OMHI). This action research project examines how clinicians might direct young people towards credible OMHI by analysing which search strategies are most helpful for developing an 'internet prescription' targeted at a youth audience. Recently qualified doctors undertook searches for OMHI about the diagnosis and treatment of seven mental health conditions. Rankings of websites in search results were compared with reliability and quality ratings derived from established evaluation instruments [the Brief DISCERN and the 12-item Health on the Net (HoN) tool]. Of 140 websites identified through seven Google searches, only 15% of those evaluated were categorized as high quality. About 17% of websites were selling a treatment or service and about 25% were regarded as untrustworthy. Also, higher rankings in the search results were not indicative of better quality OMHI (Wilcoxon signed rank test: Z = -5.28; p < .001). Although the HoN and DISCERN tools provided useful insights into the credibility of OMHI, investigators did not think either instrument could be recommended for independent use by youth. Our findings suggest that clinical services should take responsibility for identifying a range of credible sources of OMHI. The next step in translating the research strategy into clinical practice involves collaboration with young people to select those platforms most orientated to their needs and to develop rating instruments that enable youth to evaluate OMHI.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Adolescents and young adults undertake internet searches before and after attending mental health consultations, but they express concerns about how they can identify reliable online mental health information (OMHI). This action research project examines how clinicians might direct young people towards credible OMHI by analysing which search strategies are most helpful for developing an 'internet prescription' targeted at a youth audience.
METHODS
Recently qualified doctors undertook searches for OMHI about the diagnosis and treatment of seven mental health conditions. Rankings of websites in search results were compared with reliability and quality ratings derived from established evaluation instruments [the Brief DISCERN and the 12-item Health on the Net (HoN) tool].
RESULTS
Of 140 websites identified through seven Google searches, only 15% of those evaluated were categorized as high quality. About 17% of websites were selling a treatment or service and about 25% were regarded as untrustworthy. Also, higher rankings in the search results were not indicative of better quality OMHI (Wilcoxon signed rank test: Z = -5.28; p < .001). Although the HoN and DISCERN tools provided useful insights into the credibility of OMHI, investigators did not think either instrument could be recommended for independent use by youth.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that clinical services should take responsibility for identifying a range of credible sources of OMHI. The next step in translating the research strategy into clinical practice involves collaboration with young people to select those platforms most orientated to their needs and to develop rating instruments that enable youth to evaluate OMHI.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
643-650Informations de copyright
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Beaunoyer, E., Arsenault, M., Lomanowska, A., & Guitton, M. (2017). Understanding online health information: Evaluation, tools, and strategies. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(2), 183-189.
Beck, F., Richard, J. B., Nguyen-Thanh, V., Montagni, I., Parizot, I., & Renahy, E. (2014). Use of the internet as a health information resource among French young adults: Results from a nationally representative survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(5), e128.
Bernstam, E., Shelton, D., Walji, M., & Meric-Bernstam, F. (2005). Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the world wide web: What can our patients actually use? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74(1), 13-19.
Birnbaum, M., Candan, K., Libby, I., Pascucci, O., & Kane, J. (2016). Impact of online resources and social media on help-seeking behaviour in youth with psychotic symptoms. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 10(5), 397-403.
Boyer, C., Gaudinat, A., Baujard, V., & Geissbühler, A. (2007). Health on the net foundation: Assessing the quality of health web pages all over the world. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 129(Pt 2), 1017-1021.
Charnock, D., & Shepperd, S. (2004). Learning to DISCERN online: Applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. Health Education Research, 19(4), 440-446.
Daraz, L., MacDermid, J., Wilkins, S., & Shaw, L. (2009). Tools to evaluate the quality of web health information: A structured review of content and usability. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society, 5, 3.
Daraz, L., Morrow, A. S., Ponce, O. J., Beuschel, B., Farah, M. H., Katabi, A., Alsawas, M., Majzoub, A. M., Benkhadra, R., Seisa, M. O., Ding, J. F., & Prokop, L. (2019). Can patients trust online health information? A meta-narrative systematic review addressing the quality of health information on the internet. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(9), 1884-1891.
Fergie, G., Hilton, S., & Hunt, K. (2016). Young adults' experiences of seeking online information about diabetes and mental health in the age of social media. Health Expectations, 19(6), 1324-1335.
Fox, S, & Duggan, M. (2013). Health online. Pew Research Centre Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx
Gray, N., Klein, J., Noyce, P., Sesselberg, T., & Cantrill, J. (2005 Sep). The internet: A window on adolescent health literacy. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(3), 243.
Hasty, R. T., Garbalosa, R. C., Barbato, V. A., Valdes, P. J., Powers, D. W., Hernandez, E., John, J. S., Suciu, G, Qureshi, F, Popa-Radu, M, San Jose, S., Drexler, N., Patankar, R., Paz, J. R., King, C. W., Gerber, H. N., Valladares, M. G., & Somji, A. A. (2014). Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 114(5), 368-373.
Khazaal, Y., Chatton, A., Cochand, S., Coquard, O., Fernandez, S., Khan, R., Billieux, J., & Zullino, D. (2009). Brief DISCERN, six questions for the evaluation of evidence-based content of health-related websites. Patient Education and Counseling, 77(1), 33-37.
Khazaal, Y., Chatton, A., Zullino, D., & Khan, R. (2012). HoN label and DISCERN as content quality indicators of health-related websites. The Psychiatric Quarterly, 83(1), 15-27.
Lal, S., Nguyen, V., & Theriault, J. (2018). Seeking mental health information and support online: Experiences and perspectives of young people receiving treatment for first-episode psychosis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 12(3), 324-330.
McMullan, M. (2006). Patients using the internet to obtain health information: How this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 63(1-2), 24-28.
Namle, S., Ghapanchi, A., & Amrollahi, A. (2016). Information and communication technology for mental health: A systematic literature review. In M. Cruz-Cunha, I. Miranda, R. Martinho, & R. Rijo (Eds.), Encyclopedia of E-health and telemedicine (pp. 606-618). IGI Global.
Pretorius, C., Chambers, D., & Coyle, D. (2019). Young people's online help-seeking and mental health difficulties: Systematic narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(11), e13873.
Read, J., & Cain, A. (2013). A literature review and meta-analysis of drug company-funded mental health websites. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 128(6), 422-433.
Robillard, J., Jun, J., Lai, J., & Feng, T. (2018). The QUEST for quality online health information: Validation of a short quantitative tool. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18, 87.
Silberg, W., Lundberg, G., & Musacchio, R. (1997). Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: Caveant lector et viewor - Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA, 277(15), 1244-1245.
Thapa, D., Visentin, D., Kornhaber, R., West, S., & Cleary, M. (2021). The influence of online health information on health decisions: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(4), 770-784.
World Health Organization. (2020). Online Newsletter Retrieved from https://www.who.int/newsroom/spotlight/let-s-flatten-the-infodemic-curve.
World Health Organization. (2021). WHO public health research agenda for managing infodemics. World Health Organization.