Diagnostic performance of a colorimetric RT -LAMP for the identification of SARS-CoV-2: A multicenter prospective clinical evaluation in sub-Saharan Africa.
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
29
06
2021
revised:
03
08
2021
accepted:
06
08
2021
entrez:
3
9
2021
pubmed:
4
9
2021
medline:
4
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Management and control of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is critically dependent on quick and reliable identification of the virus in clinical specimens. Detection of viral RNA by a colorimetric reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is a simple, reliable and cost-effective assay, deployable in resource-limited settings (RLS). Our objective was to evaluate the intrinsic and extrinsic performances of RT-LAMP in RLS. This is a multicenter prospective observational study of diagnostic accuracy, conducted from October 2020 to February 2021 in four African Countries: Cameroon, Ethiopia, Kenya and Nigeria; and in Italy. We enroled 1657 individuals who were either COVID-19 suspect cases, or asymptomatic and presented for screening. RNA extracted from pharyngeal swabs was tested in parallel by a colorimetric RT-LAMP and by a standard real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The sensitivity and specificity of index RT LAMP compared to standard RT-PCR on 1657 prospective specimens from infected individuals was determined. For a subset of 1292 specimens, which underwent exactly the same procedures in different countries, we obtained very high specificity (98%) and positive predictive value (PPV = 99%), while the sensitivity was 87%, with a negative predictive value NPV = 70%, Stratification of RT-PCR data showed superior sensitivity achieved with an RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) below 35 (97%), which decreased to 60% above 35. In this field trial, RT-LAMP appears to be a reliable assay, comparable to RT-PCR, particularly with medium-high viral loads (Ct < 35). Hence, RT-LAMP can be deployed in RLS for timely management and prevention of COVID-19, without compromising the quality of output.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Management and control of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is critically dependent on quick and reliable identification of the virus in clinical specimens. Detection of viral RNA by a colorimetric reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is a simple, reliable and cost-effective assay, deployable in resource-limited settings (RLS). Our objective was to evaluate the intrinsic and extrinsic performances of RT-LAMP in RLS.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a multicenter prospective observational study of diagnostic accuracy, conducted from October 2020 to February 2021 in four African Countries: Cameroon, Ethiopia, Kenya and Nigeria; and in Italy. We enroled 1657 individuals who were either COVID-19 suspect cases, or asymptomatic and presented for screening. RNA extracted from pharyngeal swabs was tested in parallel by a colorimetric RT-LAMP and by a standard real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
FINDINGS
RESULTS
The sensitivity and specificity of index RT LAMP compared to standard RT-PCR on 1657 prospective specimens from infected individuals was determined. For a subset of 1292 specimens, which underwent exactly the same procedures in different countries, we obtained very high specificity (98%) and positive predictive value (PPV = 99%), while the sensitivity was 87%, with a negative predictive value NPV = 70%, Stratification of RT-PCR data showed superior sensitivity achieved with an RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) below 35 (97%), which decreased to 60% above 35.
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
In this field trial, RT-LAMP appears to be a reliable assay, comparable to RT-PCR, particularly with medium-high viral loads (Ct < 35). Hence, RT-LAMP can be deployed in RLS for timely management and prevention of COVID-19, without compromising the quality of output.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34476394
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101101
pii: S2589-5370(21)00381-3
pmc: PMC8401528
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101101Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that this study was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [Grant Number INV-022,816]. Furthermore, New England Biolabs provided reagents free of charge. The authors have no additional interests to declare.
Références
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104510
pubmed: 32570045
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(24):500
pubmed: 29299461
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):2663-2666
pubmed: 32442256
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:631-633
pubmed: 33227514
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Jan;2(1):e13-e22
pubmed: 33521734
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Jul;2(7):e311-e319
pubmed: 33846704
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:592-602
pubmed: 34015523
J Infect. 2020 Sep;81(3):357-371
pubmed: 32615199
Commun Biol. 2021 Apr 21;4(1):489
pubmed: 33883675
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0246637
pubmed: 33539485
Viruses. 2021 Apr 29;13(5):
pubmed: 33947014
Euro Surveill. 2020 Aug;25(32):
pubmed: 32794447
J Virol. 2020 May 18;94(11):
pubmed: 32238585
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jun 15;28(12):E63
pubmed: 10871386
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2249-2251
pubmed: 32306036
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Aug 12;12(556):
pubmed: 32719001
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3):
pubmed: 31992387
Clin Chem. 2020 Jul 1;66(7):975-977
pubmed: 32315390
Clin Chem. 2021 Jan 30;67(2):415-424
pubmed: 33098427
Biology (Basel). 2020 Jul 22;9(8):
pubmed: 32707972
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Jan;35(1):e23643
pubmed: 33107116
Biotechniques. 2021 Mar;70(3):167-174
pubmed: 33535813
J Virol Methods. 2021 Feb;288:114024
pubmed: 33227341
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Oct;5(10):1299-1305
pubmed: 32651556
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;109:315-320
pubmed: 34166793
Cell. 2020 Dec 23;183(7):1901-1912.e9
pubmed: 33248470
Microb Biotechnol. 2021 Jan;14(1):307-316
pubmed: 33497538
Rev Med Virol. 2021 Jan 21;:e2215
pubmed: 33476080
J Virol Methods. 2021 Oct;296:114241
pubmed: 34273438
Viruses. 2021 Apr 30;13(5):
pubmed: 33946304
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24450-24458
pubmed: 32900935
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;39(6):1059-1061
pubmed: 32342252
J Clin Virol. 2021 Mar;136:104760
pubmed: 33610926
Biotechniques. 2015 Feb 01;58(2):59-68
pubmed: 25652028
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):
pubmed: 32471894
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 15;117(37):22727-22735
pubmed: 32868442
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6):
pubmed: 32245835
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:303-305
pubmed: 33434671