JASPER: Phase 2 trial of first-line niraparib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.


Journal

Cancer
ISSN: 1097-0142
Titre abrégé: Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374236

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jan 2022
Historique:
revised: 12 07 2021
received: 05 04 2021
accepted: 09 08 2021
pubmed: 4 9 2021
medline: 11 3 2022
entrez: 3 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors may synergize with programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors to enhance adaptive and innate antitumor immune responses. In the phase 2 JASPER study (NCT04475939), the PARP inhibitor niraparib was evaluated in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic and/or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients whose tumors had programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥50% (cohort 1) or 1%-49% (cohort 2) received first-line niraparib (200 mg once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks). The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in cohorts 1 and 2. In cohort 1, ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 56.3% (9 of 16 patients; 29.9%-80.2%); 2 of 16 patients had complete responses and 7 of 16 had partial responses (PRs). In cohort 2, ORR was 20.0% (5.7%-43.7%) with 4 of 20 PRs. In cohorts 1 and 2, the median DoR was 19.7 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to not estimable [NE]) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to NE), the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-22.1 months) and 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.0-6.2 months), and the median OS was NE (95% CI, 6.0 months to NE) and 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-12.5 months), respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 88.2% and 85.7% of patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Safety was consistent with known profiles of single-agent niraparib and pembrolizumab. Niraparib plus pembrolizumab showed clinical activity in patients with advanced and/or metastatic NSCLC. The JASPER clinical trial studied a new combination treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pembrolizumab, a drug approved for NSCLC, was given with niraparib. Previous research showed that these 2 drugs together might work better than either drug alone. This study found that more than half of patients with high levels of a tumor marker responded to the combination, and one-fifth of patients with lower levels of the marker responded. The types of side effects from the combination were similar to side effects from both drugs alone. These results support more research on this combination.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors may synergize with programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors to enhance adaptive and innate antitumor immune responses. In the phase 2 JASPER study (NCT04475939), the PARP inhibitor niraparib was evaluated in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic and/or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS METHODS
Patients whose tumors had programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥50% (cohort 1) or 1%-49% (cohort 2) received first-line niraparib (200 mg once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks). The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics.
RESULTS RESULTS
Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in cohorts 1 and 2. In cohort 1, ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 56.3% (9 of 16 patients; 29.9%-80.2%); 2 of 16 patients had complete responses and 7 of 16 had partial responses (PRs). In cohort 2, ORR was 20.0% (5.7%-43.7%) with 4 of 20 PRs. In cohorts 1 and 2, the median DoR was 19.7 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to not estimable [NE]) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to NE), the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-22.1 months) and 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.0-6.2 months), and the median OS was NE (95% CI, 6.0 months to NE) and 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-12.5 months), respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 88.2% and 85.7% of patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Safety was consistent with known profiles of single-agent niraparib and pembrolizumab.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Niraparib plus pembrolizumab showed clinical activity in patients with advanced and/or metastatic NSCLC.
LAY SUMMARY BACKGROUND
The JASPER clinical trial studied a new combination treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pembrolizumab, a drug approved for NSCLC, was given with niraparib. Previous research showed that these 2 drugs together might work better than either drug alone. This study found that more than half of patients with high levels of a tumor marker responded to the combination, and one-fifth of patients with lower levels of the marker responded. The types of side effects from the combination were similar to side effects from both drugs alone. These results support more research on this combination.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34478166
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33885
pmc: PMC9293160
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Indazoles 0
Piperidines 0
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors 0
pembrolizumab DPT0O3T46P
niraparib HMC2H89N35

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04475939']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

65-74

Subventions

Organisme : GlaxoSmithKline
ID : 213352

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.

Références

Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 1;25(13):3759-3771
pubmed: 30760478
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):636-648
pubmed: 30948273
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Apr 15;23(8):1937-1944
pubmed: 27803064
Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(24):3875-82
pubmed: 24191958
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1823-1833
pubmed: 27718847
Cancer J. 2018 Jan/Feb;24(1):47-53
pubmed: 29360728
Cell Rep. 2019 Jun 18;27(12):3422-3432.e4
pubmed: 31216465
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2078-2092
pubmed: 29658856
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 24;8(1):1751
pubmed: 29170499
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Aug 01;5(8):1132-1140
pubmed: 31194225
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 22;376(25):2415-2426
pubmed: 28636851
Lancet. 2019 May 4;393(10183):1819-1830
pubmed: 30955977
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul 20;39(21):2339-2349
pubmed: 33872070
Cancer. 2022 Jan 01;128(1):65-74
pubmed: 34478166
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Biomark Res. 2015 May 01;3:9
pubmed: 26015868
J Hematol Oncol. 2019 Sep 14;12(1):98
pubmed: 31521196
Front Oncol. 2020 Apr 28;10:570
pubmed: 32457830
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3711-3720
pubmed: 28167507
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020 Apr;21(6):679-686
pubmed: 32073315
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):2040-2051
pubmed: 30280635
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2781-2789
pubmed: 28609226
J Immunol Res. 2018 Aug 8;2018:6984948
pubmed: 30159341
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec;375(22):2154-2164
pubmed: 27717299
Genes Dev. 2020 Mar 1;34(5-6):360-394
pubmed: 32029455
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 19;381(25):2391-2402
pubmed: 31562799
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Aug;14(9):882-92
pubmed: 23810788
Cancer J. 2018 Jan/Feb;24(1):15-19
pubmed: 29360723

Auteurs

Suresh S Ramalingam (SS)

Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.

Eddie Thara (E)

Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Los Angeles, California.

Mark M Awad (MM)

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Afshin Dowlati (A)

University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Basir Haque (B)

Kadlec Clinic Hematology and Oncology, Kennewick, Washington.

Thomas E Stinchcombe (TE)

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Grace K Dy (GK)

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.

David R Spigel (DR)

Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee.

Sharon Lu (S)

GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, Massachusetts.

Nithya Iyer Singh (N)

GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, Massachusetts.

Yongqiang Tang (Y)

GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, Massachusetts.

Iryna Teslenko (I)

GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, Massachusetts.

Nicholas Iannotti (N)

Hematology Oncology Associates of the Treasure Coast, Port St. Lucie, Florida.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH